国际呼吸杂志
國際呼吸雜誌
국제호흡잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESPIRATION
2011年
11期
831-833
,共3页
刘超武%林江涛%俞红霞%张晓岩%苏楠
劉超武%林江濤%俞紅霞%張曉巖%囌楠
류초무%림강도%유홍하%장효암%소남
重度吸烟者%振动反应成像%动态图像
重度吸煙者%振動反應成像%動態圖像
중도흡연자%진동반응성상%동태도상
Heavy smokers%Vibration response imaging%Dynamic imaging
目的 探讨肺功能正常重度吸烟者的振动反应成像(vibration vesponse vmaging,VRI)动态图像特征.方法 观察60例健康非吸烟者(对照组)和67例肺功能正常的重度吸烟者(重度吸烟组)VRI图像.首先采集两组受试者的临床资料(病史、体格检查、胸部X线),然后进行肺功能测定和VRI检查,比较两组之间VRI动态图像特征的差异.结果 重度吸烟组动态罔像出现无序11例(16.4%),跳跃43例(64.2%),不同步11例(16.4%),延迟6例(9.0%),对照组动态图像无序4例(6.7%),跳跃2例(3.3%),不同步0例(0.0%),延迟0例(0.0%),这些征象在两组间的分布差异均有统计学意义.重度吸烟组的动态图像积分为1.22±0.42,明显高于健康非吸烟组0.13±0.01(P<0.05).结论 肺功能正常的重度吸烟组的动态图像较对照组紊乱.
目的 探討肺功能正常重度吸煙者的振動反應成像(vibration vesponse vmaging,VRI)動態圖像特徵.方法 觀察60例健康非吸煙者(對照組)和67例肺功能正常的重度吸煙者(重度吸煙組)VRI圖像.首先採集兩組受試者的臨床資料(病史、體格檢查、胸部X線),然後進行肺功能測定和VRI檢查,比較兩組之間VRI動態圖像特徵的差異.結果 重度吸煙組動態罔像齣現無序11例(16.4%),跳躍43例(64.2%),不同步11例(16.4%),延遲6例(9.0%),對照組動態圖像無序4例(6.7%),跳躍2例(3.3%),不同步0例(0.0%),延遲0例(0.0%),這些徵象在兩組間的分佈差異均有統計學意義.重度吸煙組的動態圖像積分為1.22±0.42,明顯高于健康非吸煙組0.13±0.01(P<0.05).結論 肺功能正常的重度吸煙組的動態圖像較對照組紊亂.
목적 탐토폐공능정상중도흡연자적진동반응성상(vibration vesponse vmaging,VRI)동태도상특정.방법 관찰60례건강비흡연자(대조조)화67례폐공능정상적중도흡연자(중도흡연조)VRI도상.수선채집량조수시자적림상자료(병사、체격검사、흉부X선),연후진행폐공능측정화VRI검사,비교량조지간VRI동태도상특정적차이.결과 중도흡연조동태망상출현무서11례(16.4%),도약43례(64.2%),불동보11례(16.4%),연지6례(9.0%),대조조동태도상무서4례(6.7%),도약2례(3.3%),불동보0례(0.0%),연지0례(0.0%),저사정상재량조간적분포차이균유통계학의의.중도흡연조적동태도상적분위1.22±0.42,명현고우건강비흡연조0.13±0.01(P<0.05).결론 폐공능정상적중도흡연조적동태도상교대조조문란.
Objective Vibration response imaging(VRI) is a new lung sound imaging technology.The study was preliminarily to explore the image properties of heavy smokers. Methods All subjects were divided into two groups heavy smokers whose pulmonary function was normal, healthy non-smokers.First of all, we asked their case history and did physical examination. Then we tested their lung function and checked up their chest X-ray and VRI. Finally,the different of VRI dynamic imaging between the two groups were analyzed. Results dynamic imaging in heavy smokers group which appeared disorder, skip,derangement,delay were separately accounted for 16.4% ,64. 2% , 16.4% , 9. 0%. While in healthy nonsmokers group respectively account for 6. 7, 3. 3% , 0. 0% , 0. 0%. The results between heavy smokers whose pulmonary function is normal and healthy non-smokers were significantly different. Conclusions The dynamic image of the VRI heavy smokers whose pulmonary function was different from healthy nonsmokers group.