中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2010年
8期
606-609
,共4页
张立山%潘勇卫%田光磊%李文军%夏韶华%陶剑峰
張立山%潘勇衛%田光磊%李文軍%夏韶華%陶劍峰
장립산%반용위%전광뢰%리문군%하소화%도검봉
掌骨%骨折固定术%髓内%生物力学%研究
掌骨%骨摺固定術%髓內%生物力學%研究
장골%골절고정술%수내%생물역학%연구
Metacarpus%Fracture fixation,intramedullary%Biomechanics%Research
目的 研究单根顺行髓内针内固定术治疗掌骨骨折的生物力学性能.方法 2008年3月至5月取25侧成人前臂标本的第2~5掌骨共100根,分为第2、3掌骨(n=50)及第4、5掌骨(n=50)并横行截骨,分别随机使用钢板螺钉、顺行髓内针、交叉克氏针行骨折内固定,之后对第4、5掌骨行三点折弯试验,对第2、3掌骨行扭转应力试验.结果 三点折弯试验中,顺行髓内针的最大折弯力矩(1.49 N·m)及抗弯刚度(0.047 N·m~2)均与钢板螺钉的(分别为1.47 N·m与0.056 N·m~2)无明显差异,并且均显著大于交叉克氏针(分别为0.44 N·m与0.025 N·m~2).在扭转应力试验中,顺行髓内针的最大扭矩(0.36 N·m)明显小于钢板螺钉的(0.89 N·m),而与交叉克氏针(0.55 N·m)无显著差异;顺行髓内针的扭转刚度(0.035 N·m~2/rad)明显小于钢板螺钉(0.087 N·m~2/rad)及交叉克氏针(0.065 N·m~2/rad)的扭转刚度.结论 单根顺行髓内针内固定有较好的抗弯性能,抗旋转性能相对较差,临床应用时要注意保护.
目的 研究單根順行髓內針內固定術治療掌骨骨摺的生物力學性能.方法 2008年3月至5月取25側成人前臂標本的第2~5掌骨共100根,分為第2、3掌骨(n=50)及第4、5掌骨(n=50)併橫行截骨,分彆隨機使用鋼闆螺釘、順行髓內針、交扠剋氏針行骨摺內固定,之後對第4、5掌骨行三點摺彎試驗,對第2、3掌骨行扭轉應力試驗.結果 三點摺彎試驗中,順行髓內針的最大摺彎力矩(1.49 N·m)及抗彎剛度(0.047 N·m~2)均與鋼闆螺釘的(分彆為1.47 N·m與0.056 N·m~2)無明顯差異,併且均顯著大于交扠剋氏針(分彆為0.44 N·m與0.025 N·m~2).在扭轉應力試驗中,順行髓內針的最大扭矩(0.36 N·m)明顯小于鋼闆螺釘的(0.89 N·m),而與交扠剋氏針(0.55 N·m)無顯著差異;順行髓內針的扭轉剛度(0.035 N·m~2/rad)明顯小于鋼闆螺釘(0.087 N·m~2/rad)及交扠剋氏針(0.065 N·m~2/rad)的扭轉剛度.結論 單根順行髓內針內固定有較好的抗彎性能,抗鏇轉性能相對較差,臨床應用時要註意保護.
목적 연구단근순행수내침내고정술치료장골골절적생물역학성능.방법 2008년3월지5월취25측성인전비표본적제2~5장골공100근,분위제2、3장골(n=50)급제4、5장골(n=50)병횡행절골,분별수궤사용강판라정、순행수내침、교차극씨침행골절내고정,지후대제4、5장골행삼점절만시험,대제2、3장골행뉴전응력시험.결과 삼점절만시험중,순행수내침적최대절만력구(1.49 N·m)급항만강도(0.047 N·m~2)균여강판라정적(분별위1.47 N·m여0.056 N·m~2)무명현차이,병차균현저대우교차극씨침(분별위0.44 N·m여0.025 N·m~2).재뉴전응력시험중,순행수내침적최대뉴구(0.36 N·m)명현소우강판라정적(0.89 N·m),이여교차극씨침(0.55 N·m)무현저차이;순행수내침적뉴전강도(0.035 N·m~2/rad)명현소우강판라정(0.087 N·m~2/rad)급교차극씨침(0.065 N·m~2/rad)적뉴전강도.결론 단근순행수내침내고정유교호적항만성능,항선전성능상대교차,림상응용시요주의보호.
Objective To study the biomechanieal characteristics of antegrade intramedullary fixation for metacarpal fractures.Methods From March to May 2008,both the 4th and 5th metacarpals from 25 formalin embalmed cadaver hands had three-point bending test after transverse osteotomy followed by randomly fixation with one of the following three methods:plate and screw,antegrade intramedullary K-wire,crossed K-wire.While,both the 2nd and 3rd metacarpals had torsional loading test after the same management as the 4th and 5th metacarpal had undergone.Results In the three-point bending test,both the maximum bending moment(M_(max))and bending rigidity(EI)of the antegrade intramedullary K-wire were comparable with those of the plate and screw,and were significantly larger than those of the crossed K-wire.In the torsional loading test,the antegrade intramedullary K-wire had a statistically smaller maximum torque (T_(max))than the plate and screw,and had a comparable Tmax with the crossed K-wire;while,the torsional rigidity(GJ)of the intramedullary K-wire was statistically weaker than that of both the plate and screw and the crossed wire.Conclusions One single antegrade intramedullary K-wire can provide a satisfactory M_(max) and EI for metacarpal fixation and shows relatively weak in the torsional loading test.The injured finger should be well protected to avoid torsional deformity in clinical practice.