中华放射学杂志
中華放射學雜誌
중화방사학잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2011年
3期
279-283
,共5页
胡永胜%何新华%付璇%王自勇%王慧%陈昊%费长军%王劲武
鬍永勝%何新華%付璇%王自勇%王慧%陳昊%費長軍%王勁武
호영성%하신화%부선%왕자용%왕혜%진호%비장군%왕경무
辐射剂量%冠状血管%体层摄影术,X线计算机%心率
輻射劑量%冠狀血管%體層攝影術,X線計算機%心率
복사제량%관상혈관%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%심솔
Radiation dosage%Coronary vessels%Tomography,X-ray computed%Heart rate
目的 探讨中低心率对双源CT低管电压冠状动脉成像的图像质量及辐射剂量的影响.方法 对85例体质量指数(BMI)为17.51~30.00 kg/m2、心率在91次/min(bpm)以下的可疑冠心病患者进行双源CT低管电压(100 kVp)回顾性心电门控冠状动脉成像增强扫描,检查前不使用β受体阻滞剂控制心率.按患者扫描时的心率进行分组,≤59 bpm为A组(27例),60~69 bpm为B组(29例),≥70 bpm为C组(29例).评价各组的最佳重建时相图像,记录各组的增强扫描序列的螺距、CT容积剂量指数(CTDvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)及有效剂量(ED)值.应用单因素方差分析比较3组患者的扫描螺距、图像质量评分和辐射剂量值等.分析心率对冠状动脉成像图像质量及辐射剂量的影响.结果 A、B、C组螺距分别为0.241±0.025、0.286±0.034、0.335±0.036;3组图像质量评分分别为(4.78±0.26)、(4.66±0.56)、(4.70±0.46)分;CTDIvol值分别为(18.06±5.16)、(19.62±7.15)和(17.50±7.13)mGy,ED值分别为(4.23±1.16)、(4.59±1.75)、(4.12±1.39)mSv.3组的螺距差异有统计学意义(F=60.00,P=0.00);3组间的图像质量评分差异无统计学意义(F=0.53,P=0.59);3组间CTDIvol差异无统计学意义(F=0.83,P=0.44),ED差异也无统计学意义(F=0.86,P=0.43).结论 中低心率对双源CT低管电压冠状动脉成像的图像质量影响很小,在自动心电门控剂量窗时,对辐射剂量的影响也很小.
目的 探討中低心率對雙源CT低管電壓冠狀動脈成像的圖像質量及輻射劑量的影響.方法 對85例體質量指數(BMI)為17.51~30.00 kg/m2、心率在91次/min(bpm)以下的可疑冠心病患者進行雙源CT低管電壓(100 kVp)迴顧性心電門控冠狀動脈成像增彊掃描,檢查前不使用β受體阻滯劑控製心率.按患者掃描時的心率進行分組,≤59 bpm為A組(27例),60~69 bpm為B組(29例),≥70 bpm為C組(29例).評價各組的最佳重建時相圖像,記錄各組的增彊掃描序列的螺距、CT容積劑量指數(CTDvol)、劑量長度乘積(DLP)及有效劑量(ED)值.應用單因素方差分析比較3組患者的掃描螺距、圖像質量評分和輻射劑量值等.分析心率對冠狀動脈成像圖像質量及輻射劑量的影響.結果 A、B、C組螺距分彆為0.241±0.025、0.286±0.034、0.335±0.036;3組圖像質量評分分彆為(4.78±0.26)、(4.66±0.56)、(4.70±0.46)分;CTDIvol值分彆為(18.06±5.16)、(19.62±7.15)和(17.50±7.13)mGy,ED值分彆為(4.23±1.16)、(4.59±1.75)、(4.12±1.39)mSv.3組的螺距差異有統計學意義(F=60.00,P=0.00);3組間的圖像質量評分差異無統計學意義(F=0.53,P=0.59);3組間CTDIvol差異無統計學意義(F=0.83,P=0.44),ED差異也無統計學意義(F=0.86,P=0.43).結論 中低心率對雙源CT低管電壓冠狀動脈成像的圖像質量影響很小,在自動心電門控劑量窗時,對輻射劑量的影響也很小.
목적 탐토중저심솔대쌍원CT저관전압관상동맥성상적도상질량급복사제량적영향.방법 대85례체질량지수(BMI)위17.51~30.00 kg/m2、심솔재91차/min(bpm)이하적가의관심병환자진행쌍원CT저관전압(100 kVp)회고성심전문공관상동맥성상증강소묘,검사전불사용β수체조체제공제심솔.안환자소묘시적심솔진행분조,≤59 bpm위A조(27례),60~69 bpm위B조(29례),≥70 bpm위C조(29례).평개각조적최가중건시상도상,기록각조적증강소묘서렬적라거、CT용적제량지수(CTDvol)、제량장도승적(DLP)급유효제량(ED)치.응용단인소방차분석비교3조환자적소묘라거、도상질량평분화복사제량치등.분석심솔대관상동맥성상도상질량급복사제량적영향.결과 A、B、C조라거분별위0.241±0.025、0.286±0.034、0.335±0.036;3조도상질량평분분별위(4.78±0.26)、(4.66±0.56)、(4.70±0.46)분;CTDIvol치분별위(18.06±5.16)、(19.62±7.15)화(17.50±7.13)mGy,ED치분별위(4.23±1.16)、(4.59±1.75)、(4.12±1.39)mSv.3조적라거차이유통계학의의(F=60.00,P=0.00);3조간적도상질량평분차이무통계학의의(F=0.53,P=0.59);3조간CTDIvol차이무통계학의의(F=0.83,P=0.44),ED차이야무통계학의의(F=0.86,P=0.43).결론 중저심솔대쌍원CT저관전압관상동맥성상적도상질량영향흔소,재자동심전문공제량창시,대복사제량적영향야흔소.
Objective To evaluate the imaging quality and radiation doses of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) coronary angiography at a low tube voltage in patients with medium and low heart rate.Methods Eighty-five patients[heart rate (HR) < 91 beats per minute (bpm); body mass index (BMI) 17. 51-30. 00 kg/m2]suspected of coronary artery disease received retrospectively ECG-gating coronary angiography with dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Definition, Siemens) at a tube voltage of 100 kVp. For all patients, no beta-blocker was used before CT scan. According to the HR, the patients were divided into three groups: Group A, HR ≤ 59 bpm, n = 27; Group B, HR 60-69 bpm, n = 29; Group C,HR ≥70 bpm, n = 29. All images were transferred to a workstation for postprocessing. The best R-R interval reconstruction images of all groups were evaluated. The value of pitch, CT volume dosage index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP)and effective dose (ED)were recorded. The pitch, the score of imaging quality of coronary artery segments and the radiation dose were compared with one-way ANOVA. The influence of HR on image quality and radiation doses of coronary artery was analyzed. Results The value of pitch in Group A, Group B and Group C was 0. 241 ± 0. 025, 0. 286 ± 0. 034 and 0. 335 ± 0. 036,respectively. The mean score of imaging quality of coronary artery segments in Group A, Group B and Group C was 4. 78 ± 0. 26, 4. 66 ± 0. 56 and 4. 70 ± 0. 46, respectively. The value of CTDIvol in Group A,Group B and Group C was (18.06 ±5. 16), (19. 62 ±7. 15) and (17. 50 ±7. 13) mGy, respectively. The value of ED in group A, Group B and Group C was (4.23 ± 1.76), (4.59 ± 1.75) and (4.12 ±1.39) mSv, respectively. There was statistical difference in value of pitch among the three groups (F =60. 00, P= 0. 00). There were no statistical difference in score of imaging quality, CTDIvol and value of ED among the three groups (F = 0. 53, P = 0. 59; F = 0. 83, P = 0. 44 ; F = 0. 86, P = 0. 43). Conclusion Medium and low HR have little influences on image quality of dual-source CT coronary angiography at a low tube voltage. When the auto ECG-gating is selected, there is little influence on radiation dosage as well.