中华流行病学杂志
中華流行病學雜誌
중화류행병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
2011年
6期
571-575
,共5页
冒险行为%风险感知%青少年
冒險行為%風險感知%青少年
모험행위%풍험감지%청소년
Risk-taking behavior%Risk perception%Adolescent
目的 根据冒险的领域特殊性理论编制含有多个领域的青少年冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷,为全面地评估青少年冒险行为和风险感知提供工具.方法 以银川市426名中学生为问卷的初测试对象,回收有效问卷422份,再以宁夏和安徽省(区)2402名中学生为正式测试对象进行青少年冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷的测试.结果 探索性因素分析显示两问卷都包括社会、娱乐、安全、道德四个领域,33个项目,贡献率分别是41.25%和45.5%,分半信度分别是0.848和0.890,内部一致性信度分别是0.900和0.938.验证性因素分析各项拟合指数分别为:x2/df=8.36和6.73,RMSEA=0.066和0.054,NFI=0.97和0.97,CFI=0.97和0.97.青少年冒险行为和风险感知存在性别差异,F(1,2288)=56.256,P<0.001,F(1,2288)=10.766,P=0.05;冒险行为随年龄逐步增多,F(2,2288)=140.067,P<0.001,而风险感知则逐渐减小,F(2,2288)=54.900,P<0.001.青少年在社会领域的冒险最为突出,随后依次是娱乐、道德、安全领域.结论 青少年多领域冒险行为问卷和风险感知问卷信、效度良好,可以作为考查青少年冒险行为和风险感知的工具.
目的 根據冒險的領域特殊性理論編製含有多箇領域的青少年冒險行為問捲和風險感知問捲,為全麵地評估青少年冒險行為和風險感知提供工具.方法 以銀川市426名中學生為問捲的初測試對象,迴收有效問捲422份,再以寧夏和安徽省(區)2402名中學生為正式測試對象進行青少年冒險行為問捲和風險感知問捲的測試.結果 探索性因素分析顯示兩問捲都包括社會、娛樂、安全、道德四箇領域,33箇項目,貢獻率分彆是41.25%和45.5%,分半信度分彆是0.848和0.890,內部一緻性信度分彆是0.900和0.938.驗證性因素分析各項擬閤指數分彆為:x2/df=8.36和6.73,RMSEA=0.066和0.054,NFI=0.97和0.97,CFI=0.97和0.97.青少年冒險行為和風險感知存在性彆差異,F(1,2288)=56.256,P<0.001,F(1,2288)=10.766,P=0.05;冒險行為隨年齡逐步增多,F(2,2288)=140.067,P<0.001,而風險感知則逐漸減小,F(2,2288)=54.900,P<0.001.青少年在社會領域的冒險最為突齣,隨後依次是娛樂、道德、安全領域.結論 青少年多領域冒險行為問捲和風險感知問捲信、效度良好,可以作為攷查青少年冒險行為和風險感知的工具.
목적 근거모험적영역특수성이론편제함유다개영역적청소년모험행위문권화풍험감지문권,위전면지평고청소년모험행위화풍험감지제공공구.방법 이은천시426명중학생위문권적초측시대상,회수유효문권422빈,재이저하화안휘성(구)2402명중학생위정식측시대상진행청소년모험행위문권화풍험감지문권적측시.결과 탐색성인소분석현시량문권도포괄사회、오악、안전、도덕사개영역,33개항목,공헌솔분별시41.25%화45.5%,분반신도분별시0.848화0.890,내부일치성신도분별시0.900화0.938.험증성인소분석각항의합지수분별위:x2/df=8.36화6.73,RMSEA=0.066화0.054,NFI=0.97화0.97,CFI=0.97화0.97.청소년모험행위화풍험감지존재성별차이,F(1,2288)=56.256,P<0.001,F(1,2288)=10.766,P=0.05;모험행위수년령축보증다,F(2,2288)=140.067,P<0.001,이풍험감지칙축점감소,F(2,2288)=54.900,P<0.001.청소년재사회영역적모험최위돌출,수후의차시오악、도덕、안전영역.결론 청소년다영역모험행위문권화풍험감지문권신、효도량호,가이작위고사청소년모험행위화풍험감지적공구.
Objective According to the Domain Specific Theory (DST) in risk-taking, this study intended to construct adolescent risk-taking behavior questionnaire and risk perception questionnaire inferred many domains for studying the adolescent risk-taking behavior and risk perception. Methods With 422 middle school students in Yinchuan as subjects to develop the questionnaire. 2402 middle school students in Ningxia and Anhui were surveyed using the questionnaire. Results Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) indicated that both of the questionnaires contain four domains named society, recreation, safe and moral, and 33 items, which could explain 41.25% and 45.5% of the total variance respectively. The split-half reliability were 0.848, 0.890 and the coefficient of internal consistency were 0.900 and 0.938. The fit indices of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were as follows: x2/df=8.36 and 6.73, RMSEA=0.066 and 0.054, NFI=0.97 and 0.97, CFI=0.97 and 0.97 separately. Gender difference in adolescent risk-taking behavior and risk perception were noticed, with F(1, 2288) =56.256, P<0.001 ,F(1, 2288) =10.766, P=0.05. The adolescent risk-taking behaviors increased with age, F(2, 2288) =140.067, P<0.001, while the risk perception decreased with age, F{2,2288) =54.900,P<0.001. Adolescent on the highest score was in the social risk, followed by recreation, morality and safety. Conclusion Our results showed the newly developed scales were reliable and valid enough to be applicable to measure the adolescent risk-taking behavior and risk perception.
