中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2009年
12期
941-943
,共3页
唐冰%朱斌%毕良宽%薛春利%蔡浩%朱家源
唐冰%硃斌%畢良寬%薛春利%蔡浩%硃傢源
당빙%주빈%필량관%설춘리%채호%주가원
瘢痕疙瘩%基因表达%信号传导%转化生长因子β1%Smads基因
瘢痕疙瘩%基因錶達%信號傳導%轉化生長因子β1%Smads基因
반흔흘탑%기인표체%신호전도%전화생장인자β1%Smads기인
Keloid%Gene expression%Signaling transduction%Transforming growth factor betal%Smads gene
目的 探讨不同类型Smads在瘢痕疙瘩、正常瘢痕和正常皮肤中的差异表达及其意义.方法 采用RT-PCR和Western Blot法分别对10例瘢痕疙瘩、10例正常瘢痕及10例正常皮肤组织,以及体外培养瘢痕疙瘩、正常瘢痕及正常皮肤成纤维细胞中的Smads mRNA及蛋白的表达水平进行检测.用t检验比较其表达差异,P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义.结果 在瘢痕疙瘩组织及瘢痕疙瘩成纤维细胞中,Smad7的mRNA及蛋白水平表达明显低于正常瘢痕(P<0.05)和正常皮肤(P<0.05),而Smad2、3的mRNA及蛋白水平表达以及磷酸化的Smad2、3的蛋白水平表达并无明显改变(P>0.05).结论 在瘢痕疙瘩中,存在有Smad7的表达缺陷,这可能是增高的转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)/Smads信号传导不能被自身负反馈循环终止的重要原因.
目的 探討不同類型Smads在瘢痕疙瘩、正常瘢痕和正常皮膚中的差異錶達及其意義.方法 採用RT-PCR和Western Blot法分彆對10例瘢痕疙瘩、10例正常瘢痕及10例正常皮膚組織,以及體外培養瘢痕疙瘩、正常瘢痕及正常皮膚成纖維細胞中的Smads mRNA及蛋白的錶達水平進行檢測.用t檢驗比較其錶達差異,P<0.05為差異具有統計學意義.結果 在瘢痕疙瘩組織及瘢痕疙瘩成纖維細胞中,Smad7的mRNA及蛋白水平錶達明顯低于正常瘢痕(P<0.05)和正常皮膚(P<0.05),而Smad2、3的mRNA及蛋白水平錶達以及燐痠化的Smad2、3的蛋白水平錶達併無明顯改變(P>0.05).結論 在瘢痕疙瘩中,存在有Smad7的錶達缺陷,這可能是增高的轉化生長因子-β1(TGF-β1)/Smads信號傳導不能被自身負反饋循環終止的重要原因.
목적 탐토불동류형Smads재반흔흘탑、정상반흔화정상피부중적차이표체급기의의.방법 채용RT-PCR화Western Blot법분별대10례반흔흘탑、10례정상반흔급10례정상피부조직,이급체외배양반흔흘탑、정상반흔급정상피부성섬유세포중적Smads mRNA급단백적표체수평진행검측.용t검험비교기표체차이,P<0.05위차이구유통계학의의.결과 재반흔흘탑조직급반흔흘탑성섬유세포중,Smad7적mRNA급단백수평표체명현저우정상반흔(P<0.05)화정상피부(P<0.05),이Smad2、3적mRNA급단백수평표체이급린산화적Smad2、3적단백수평표체병무명현개변(P>0.05).결론 재반흔흘탑중,존재유Smad7적표체결함,저가능시증고적전화생장인자-β1(TGF-β1)/Smads신호전도불능피자신부반궤순배종지적중요원인.
Objective To investigate the differential expression of different types of Smads in keloids, normal scars and normal skins and its possible clinicopathological significance. Methods RT-PCR and Western blot methods were used to examine the expression of Smads mRNA and proteins level in 10 cases of keloid, in 10 cases of normal scar and in 10 cases of normal skin tissues and fibroblasts. Fibroblasts of keloid, normal scar and normal skin were cultured in vitro. The expression difference were compared and analyzed by t-test, there was statistical difference when P<0.05. Results The mRNA and protein expression of inhibitory Smad7 were significantly down regulated in keloid compared with normal scar (P< 0.05) and normal skin (P<0.05). However, no significant difference of the mRNA and protein expression of Smad2, 3 and the protein expression of phosphorylation of Smad2, 3 in keloid, normal scar, normal skin tissues and fibroblasts. Conclusions The decreased expression of Smad7 in keloid might play a significant role in the increased TGF-β1/Smads signal transduction, which can not be terminated by autologous negative feedback cycle.