肿瘤研究与临床
腫瘤研究與臨床
종류연구여림상
CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINIC
2009年
11期
745-747
,共3页
崔宏建%李丽%周立中%关小倩%班丽英%王玲
崔宏建%李麗%週立中%關小倩%班麗英%王玲
최굉건%리려%주립중%관소천%반려영%왕령
肠肿瘤%药物疗法%联合%西妥昔单抗
腸腫瘤%藥物療法%聯閤%西妥昔單抗
장종류%약물요법%연합%서타석단항
Intestinal neoplasms%Drug therapy%combination%Cetuximab
目的 比较西妥昔单抗250mg/m~2单周方案和500mg/m~2双周方案分别联合化疗治疗晚期大肠癌的近期疗效及安全性.方法 56例晚期大肠癌患者,ECOC行为状态评分0~2分,均有可评价病灶(RECIST 2000标准).西妥昔单抗单周方案联合化疗组30例,给药方法为400mg/m~2第1周,以后250mg/m~2每周重复应用;双周方案联合化疗组26例,给药方法为500mg/m~2第1周,以后每两周重复应用.两组均以完成8周治疗或出现疾病进展为治疗终点.结果 西妥昔单抗单周方案联合化疗组28例可评价疗效:完全缓解(CR)1例,部分缓解(PR)7例,疾病稳定(SD)11例,疾病进展(PD)9例,有效率28.6%,疾病控制率67.9%;双周方案联合化疗组26例可评价疗效:CR 0例,PR 8例,SD 9例,PD9例,有效率30.8%,疾病控制率65.4%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组Ⅲ~Ⅳ度不良反应主要表现为皮疹、恶心、中性粒细胞减少及白细胞减少,两组比较差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 西妥昔单抗单周和双周方案分别联合化疗治疗晚期大肠癌疗效相近,不良反应均可耐受.
目的 比較西妥昔單抗250mg/m~2單週方案和500mg/m~2雙週方案分彆聯閤化療治療晚期大腸癌的近期療效及安全性.方法 56例晚期大腸癌患者,ECOC行為狀態評分0~2分,均有可評價病竈(RECIST 2000標準).西妥昔單抗單週方案聯閤化療組30例,給藥方法為400mg/m~2第1週,以後250mg/m~2每週重複應用;雙週方案聯閤化療組26例,給藥方法為500mg/m~2第1週,以後每兩週重複應用.兩組均以完成8週治療或齣現疾病進展為治療終點.結果 西妥昔單抗單週方案聯閤化療組28例可評價療效:完全緩解(CR)1例,部分緩解(PR)7例,疾病穩定(SD)11例,疾病進展(PD)9例,有效率28.6%,疾病控製率67.9%;雙週方案聯閤化療組26例可評價療效:CR 0例,PR 8例,SD 9例,PD9例,有效率30.8%,疾病控製率65.4%,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).兩組Ⅲ~Ⅳ度不良反應主要錶現為皮疹、噁心、中性粒細胞減少及白細胞減少,兩組比較差異也無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 西妥昔單抗單週和雙週方案分彆聯閤化療治療晚期大腸癌療效相近,不良反應均可耐受.
목적 비교서타석단항250mg/m~2단주방안화500mg/m~2쌍주방안분별연합화료치료만기대장암적근기료효급안전성.방법 56례만기대장암환자,ECOC행위상태평분0~2분,균유가평개병조(RECIST 2000표준).서타석단항단주방안연합화료조30례,급약방법위400mg/m~2제1주,이후250mg/m~2매주중복응용;쌍주방안연합화료조26례,급약방법위500mg/m~2제1주,이후매량주중복응용.량조균이완성8주치료혹출현질병진전위치료종점.결과 서타석단항단주방안연합화료조28례가평개료효:완전완해(CR)1례,부분완해(PR)7례,질병은정(SD)11례,질병진전(PD)9례,유효솔28.6%,질병공제솔67.9%;쌍주방안연합화료조26례가평개료효:CR 0례,PR 8례,SD 9례,PD9례,유효솔30.8%,질병공제솔65.4%,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).량조Ⅲ~Ⅳ도불량반응주요표현위피진、악심、중성립세포감소급백세포감소,량조비교차이야무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 서타석단항단주화쌍주방안분별연합화료치료만기대장암료효상근,불량반응균가내수.
Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and main side effects between one-week and two-week schedule of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods 56 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled, ECOG physical status 0~2, good liver and renal function, using the RECIST published in 2000 to evaluate the measurable lesions. 30 patients received oneweek schedule of cetuximab plus chemotherapy, cetuximab was administered at an initial dose of 400 mg/m~2 followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m~2; 26 patients received two -week schedule of cetuximab plus chemotheraphy, cetuximab was administered at an initial dose of 500 mg/m~2 and the same dose was given every two weeks. The termination of the study was patients finishing 8 weeks treatment or disease progress.Results 28 patients were evaluable in one-week schedule group: CR 1, PR 7, SD 11, PD 9, RR was 28.6 %,DCR was 67.9 %. 26 patients were evaluable in two-week schedule: none of CR, PR 8, SD 9, PD 9, RR was 30.8 %, DCR was 65.4 %, and no significant difference was found(P >0.05). Grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ toxicity were rash,nausea, vomiting, neutropenia and reduction of leukemia, no significant difference was found in the two groups (P >0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect and safety for metastatic colorectal cancer are similar between one-week and two-week schedule of cetuximab plus chemotherapy.