中国小儿急救医学
中國小兒急救醫學
중국소인급구의학
CHINESE PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
2008年
z1期
1-2
,共2页
陈光营%LU Zhu-jin
陳光營%LU Zhu-jin
진광영%LU Zhu-jin
小儿危重评分%小儿死亡危险评分%危重症
小兒危重評分%小兒死亡危險評分%危重癥
소인위중평분%소인사망위험평분%위중증
Pediatric clinical illness score%Pediatric risk of mortality%Critical illness
目的 通过对PICU危重患儿小儿危重评分(PCIS)和小儿死亡危险评分(PRISM)的比较判断两种评分的临床应用价值.方法 对580例PICU住院患儿按照小儿危重评分标准、死亡及器官衰竭情况进行分组,根据各组PRISM评分分析比较各组问的差异性.结果 危重组、极危重组与非危重组各组间的PRISM评分差异有显著性(P<0.01);死亡组与存活组的PRISM评分值的差异也有显著性(P<0.01);PRISM评分随器官衰竭数增加而增高(P<0.05).结论 小儿危重评分和死亡危险评分对临床危重患儿的病情危重程度、死亡危险程度的判断有指导价值.
目的 通過對PICU危重患兒小兒危重評分(PCIS)和小兒死亡危險評分(PRISM)的比較判斷兩種評分的臨床應用價值.方法 對580例PICU住院患兒按照小兒危重評分標準、死亡及器官衰竭情況進行分組,根據各組PRISM評分分析比較各組問的差異性.結果 危重組、極危重組與非危重組各組間的PRISM評分差異有顯著性(P<0.01);死亡組與存活組的PRISM評分值的差異也有顯著性(P<0.01);PRISM評分隨器官衰竭數增加而增高(P<0.05).結論 小兒危重評分和死亡危險評分對臨床危重患兒的病情危重程度、死亡危險程度的判斷有指導價值.
목적 통과대PICU위중환인소인위중평분(PCIS)화소인사망위험평분(PRISM)적비교판단량충평분적림상응용개치.방법 대580례PICU주원환인안조소인위중평분표준、사망급기관쇠갈정황진행분조,근거각조PRISM평분분석비교각조문적차이성.결과 위중조、겁위중조여비위중조각조간적PRISM평분차이유현저성(P<0.01);사망조여존활조적PRISM평분치적차이야유현저성(P<0.01);PRISM평분수기관쇠갈수증가이증고(P<0.05).결론 소인위중평분화사망위험평분대림상위중환인적병정위중정도、사망위험정도적판단유지도개치.
Objective To evaluate the use of pediatric clinical illness score(PCIS) and pediatric risk of mortality(PRISM) in severe cases in pediatric intensive care unit(PICU). Methods 580 patients were divid-ed into groups according to PICS results, death and the numbers of organ failure. Severity, mortality were ana-lyzed. PRISM scores were also investigated in these groups respectively. Results The PRISM score of the ex-tremely-severe group was higher than that of the severe group and the non-severe group(P<0.01). The mean value of scores in death group was higher than that in survival group(P<0.01). The PRISM scores was in-creasing along with the growing numbers of organ failure (P<0.05). Conclusion Both PCIS and PRISM scores have good clinical value in assessing the severity and risk of death in patients in PICU.
