国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2011年
11期
1299-1302
,共4页
何芸%赵强%邹筱冬%吴同果
何蕓%趙彊%鄒篠鼕%吳同果
하예%조강%추소동%오동과
高血压病%脂联素%左心室肥厚
高血壓病%脂聯素%左心室肥厚
고혈압병%지련소%좌심실비후
Essential hypertension%Adiponectin%Left ventricular hypertrophy
目的 探讨高血压病患者左心室重构的不同阶段血清脂联素(APN)水平与左心室几何构型的关系.方法 对133例高血压病患者进行超声心动图检查,依据左心室质量指数、左心室相对室壁厚度将患者分为左心室正常构型组、左心室向心性重构组、左心室向心性肥厚组和左心窒离心性肥厚组.30例健康体检者为对照组.ELISA法测定血清APN水平.结果 对照组、左心室正常构型组、左心室向心性重构组之间血清APN水平比较差异无显著性(P>0.05).与对照组比较,左心室向心性肥厚组和左心室离心性肥厚组高血压病患者的血清APN水平显著降低(P<0.01),且左心室离心性肥厚组APN水平下降的更明显(P<0.01).左心室肥厚组患者的血清APN水平与左心室质最指数呈显著的负相关(P<0.05).结论 在规范化治疗的高血压病患者,血清APN水平仍能很好的反映左心室肥厚的程度.
目的 探討高血壓病患者左心室重構的不同階段血清脂聯素(APN)水平與左心室幾何構型的關繫.方法 對133例高血壓病患者進行超聲心動圖檢查,依據左心室質量指數、左心室相對室壁厚度將患者分為左心室正常構型組、左心室嚮心性重構組、左心室嚮心性肥厚組和左心窒離心性肥厚組.30例健康體檢者為對照組.ELISA法測定血清APN水平.結果 對照組、左心室正常構型組、左心室嚮心性重構組之間血清APN水平比較差異無顯著性(P>0.05).與對照組比較,左心室嚮心性肥厚組和左心室離心性肥厚組高血壓病患者的血清APN水平顯著降低(P<0.01),且左心室離心性肥厚組APN水平下降的更明顯(P<0.01).左心室肥厚組患者的血清APN水平與左心室質最指數呈顯著的負相關(P<0.05).結論 在規範化治療的高血壓病患者,血清APN水平仍能很好的反映左心室肥厚的程度.
목적 탐토고혈압병환자좌심실중구적불동계단혈청지련소(APN)수평여좌심실궤하구형적관계.방법 대133례고혈압병환자진행초성심동도검사,의거좌심실질량지수、좌심실상대실벽후도장환자분위좌심실정상구형조、좌심실향심성중구조、좌심실향심성비후조화좌심질리심성비후조.30례건강체검자위대조조.ELISA법측정혈청APN수평.결과 대조조、좌심실정상구형조、좌심실향심성중구조지간혈청APN수평비교차이무현저성(P>0.05).여대조조비교,좌심실향심성비후조화좌심실리심성비후조고혈압병환자적혈청APN수평현저강저(P<0.01),차좌심실리심성비후조APN수평하강적경명현(P<0.01).좌심실비후조환자적혈청APN수평여좌심실질최지수정현저적부상관(P<0.05).결론 재규범화치료적고혈압병환자,혈청APN수평잉능흔호적반영좌심실비후적정도.
Objective To investigate the relationship between serum adiponectin ( APN ) level and left ventricular geometry in patients with essential hypertension. Methods Echocardiography was performed on 133 patients with essential hypertension. According to left ventricular mass index ( LVMI) and relative wall thickness ( RWT ), patients were divided into normal geometry group ( n = 37 ), concentric remodeling group ( n=32 ), concentric hypertrophy group ( n = 34 )and eccentric hypertrophy group ( n = 30). 30 healthy subjects were used as control. Serum APN levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Serum APN levels did not differ significantly among the control group, the normal geometry group, and the concentric remodeling group ( P>0.05 ). As compared with those in the control group, serum APN levels were markedly lower in the concentric hypertrophy group and the eccentric hypertrophy group ( P< 0.01 ), especially in the latter group ( P< 0.01 ). APN levels were negatively related with LVMI ( P < 0.05 ) in those with ventricular hypertrophy. Conclusions Serum APN levels can still reflect the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients receiving standard therapies.