南方建筑
南方建築
남방건축
SOUTH ARCHITECTURE
2011年
3期
42-44
,共3页
传统乡土聚落%西南%民居%景观变迁%保护
傳統鄉土聚落%西南%民居%景觀變遷%保護
전통향토취락%서남%민거%경관변천%보호
historical villages%Southeast China%Folk Houses%Landscape change%Protection
以我国西南地区的几个传统乡土聚落的实例追踪调研为基础,深入剖析了近十年来西南传统乡土聚落中的民居景观的总体布局、居住单元、附属空间和建筑材料的变迁历史与趋势,并将其与同时期发生的保护行为等进行相关分析。结果表明:西南传统乡土聚落的民居景观变迁在不同村寨中均表现出较为相似的变化方向,由于受关注程度和保护级别的差异,村寨之间存在时差先后的分布特点;便利的交通条件和较强的保护关注程度会推进民居建筑的现代性变迁,而旅游介入因子的强弱会影响民居景观变迁的方向;民居建筑的各种变化趋势与村寨的传统性延续之间存在一定矛盾;保护级别较低的村寨的民居景观的变迁容易发生突变,而保护级别较高的村寨民居景观变迁会呈现出村寨内部范围的区域差异性。
以我國西南地區的幾箇傳統鄉土聚落的實例追蹤調研為基礎,深入剖析瞭近十年來西南傳統鄉土聚落中的民居景觀的總體佈跼、居住單元、附屬空間和建築材料的變遷歷史與趨勢,併將其與同時期髮生的保護行為等進行相關分析。結果錶明:西南傳統鄉土聚落的民居景觀變遷在不同村寨中均錶現齣較為相似的變化方嚮,由于受關註程度和保護級彆的差異,村寨之間存在時差先後的分佈特點;便利的交通條件和較彊的保護關註程度會推進民居建築的現代性變遷,而旅遊介入因子的彊弱會影響民居景觀變遷的方嚮;民居建築的各種變化趨勢與村寨的傳統性延續之間存在一定矛盾;保護級彆較低的村寨的民居景觀的變遷容易髮生突變,而保護級彆較高的村寨民居景觀變遷會呈現齣村寨內部範圍的區域差異性。
이아국서남지구적궤개전통향토취락적실례추종조연위기출,심입부석료근십년래서남전통향토취락중적민거경관적총체포국、거주단원、부속공간화건축재료적변천역사여추세,병장기여동시기발생적보호행위등진행상관분석。결과표명:서남전통향토취락적민거경관변천재불동촌채중균표현출교위상사적변화방향,유우수관주정도화보호급별적차이,촌채지간존재시차선후적분포특점;편리적교통조건화교강적보호관주정도회추진민거건축적현대성변천,이여유개입인자적강약회영향민거경관변천적방향;민거건축적각충변화추세여촌채적전통성연속지간존재일정모순;보호급별교저적촌채적민거경관적변천용역발생돌변,이보호급별교고적촌채민거경관변천회정현출촌채내부범위적구역차이성。
Five representative historical villages in southwest China were investigated to show how their folk houses landscapes had changed during the last decade, which involving the change of its layout in the village, resident unit, attached spaces and construction material. This article provides an analysis of the dialectical relationship between reservation practices and restless landscape of folk houses from a diachronic perspective, which verifies the shortcomings of the heritage protection programs of historical villages in Southwest China. The results indicate:(1) There is a similar tendency of the 5 villages disregarding of its time, depending on the degree of protection. (2) Ease of access and protect attention bring modernization to the folk houses in the villages. Tourism would affect the direction of the change of the folk houses. (3) All kinds of changes of the folk houses could affect the continuous development of the traditional heritage. (4) Villages with lower protection show erratic tendency in the change of the folk houses. However, for the village with higher protection practice, there shows district difference in the change of the folk houses.