CAJ | 학술논문

目的为便于跨文化研究，采用模糊数学的原理对SF-36进行中国量化标准研究。方法在某城市按年龄、性别和职业分层抽取650人，对SF-36的8个领域中的6个备择答案超过2个的领域进行量化值区间估计。共收回有效问卷646份。结果多数答案等级的区间估计值的模糊度小于0.5，仅第一领域“躯体活动功能”有4个答案等级的区间估计模糊度大于0.5。采用中国评分标准后，SF-36的8个领域得分值的高低顺位更接近原量表假设。结论本研究研制的量化标准更适合于中国人群。建议将第一领域“躯体活动功能”的3个答案等级简化为“是”“否”两级。
목적 위편우과문화연구，채용모호수학적원리대SF-36진행중국양화표준연구。방법 재모성시안년령、성별화직업분층추취650인，대SF-36적8개영역중적6개비택답안초과2개적영역진행양화치구간고계。공수회유효문권646빈。결과 다수답안등급적구간고계치적모호도소우0.5，부제일영역“구체활동공능”유4개답안등급적구간고계모호도대우0.5。채용중국평분표준후，SF-36적8개영역득분치적고저순위경접근원량표가설。결론 본연구연제적양화표준경괄합우중국인군。건의장제일영역“구체활동공능”적3개답안등급간화위“시”“부”량급。
Objective To facilitate the cross-cultural comp arison, weemployed the principles of fuzzy mathematics in scaling the SF-36 in a Chinese populati on. Methods We stratified an urban population according to the age, sex, and oc cupation, and selected 650 people to participate in the study. A total of 646 va lid questionnaires were returned. In the 8 domains of the SF-36, the interval e stimation of the scores of different alternative answers of 6 domains which have more than 2 alternative answers were conducted. Results The fu zzy degrees of m ost interval estimations were less than 0.5, except 4 estimations in the domain "physical functions". The ordering of the scores of 8 domains was more similar t o the original assumption by our scaling criteria than by the US scaling criteri a. Conclusion The scaling criteria set in this study is more s uitable for use in Chinese population and we suggest that the alternative answers of the domain "physical functions" be simplified to “yes” and “no”.