中华神经医学杂志
中華神經醫學雜誌
중화신경의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEUROMEDICINE
2008年
5期
437-439
,共3页
刘重霄%师蔚%柯连蔚%屈建强%王芳茹%白斌%王康敏
劉重霄%師蔚%柯連蔚%屈建彊%王芳茹%白斌%王康敏
류중소%사위%가련위%굴건강%왕방여%백빈%왕강민
神经胶质瘤%增殖细胞核抗原%细胞周期素D1%病理分级%预后
神經膠質瘤%增殖細胞覈抗原%細胞週期素D1%病理分級%預後
신경효질류%증식세포핵항원%세포주기소D1%병리분급%예후
Glioma%PCNA%CyclinD1%Pathological grade%Prognosis
目的 探讨细胞周期素D1(CyclinD1)和增殖细胞核抗原(PCNA)在脑胶质瘤中的联合检测与该肿瘤恶性程度及患者预后的相关性.方法 采用免疫组化SP法联合检测63例脑胶质瘤组织中CyclinD1和PCNA表达水平,并行临床随访,对比分析脑胶质瘤不同病理分级和不同生存期组间CyclinD1和PCNA单独检测标记指数(LI)及联合检测LI的差异.结果 PCNA和CyclinD1联合检测LI随着脑胶质瘤恶性程度的增高而增大,各级别间联合检测LI的差异均有显著性(P<0.05).同时该联合检测LI随着脑胶质瘤患者生存期限的延长而减少,不同生存期组问的联合检测LI均有显著性差异(P<0.05).结论 CyclinD1和PCNA联合检测LI较PCNA或CyclinD1单独检测LI能更为准确地反映脑胶质瘤恶性程度及患者预后,可作为评估脑胶质瘤恶性程度及患者预后的辅助指标.
目的 探討細胞週期素D1(CyclinD1)和增殖細胞覈抗原(PCNA)在腦膠質瘤中的聯閤檢測與該腫瘤噁性程度及患者預後的相關性.方法 採用免疫組化SP法聯閤檢測63例腦膠質瘤組織中CyclinD1和PCNA錶達水平,併行臨床隨訪,對比分析腦膠質瘤不同病理分級和不同生存期組間CyclinD1和PCNA單獨檢測標記指數(LI)及聯閤檢測LI的差異.結果 PCNA和CyclinD1聯閤檢測LI隨著腦膠質瘤噁性程度的增高而增大,各級彆間聯閤檢測LI的差異均有顯著性(P<0.05).同時該聯閤檢測LI隨著腦膠質瘤患者生存期限的延長而減少,不同生存期組問的聯閤檢測LI均有顯著性差異(P<0.05).結論 CyclinD1和PCNA聯閤檢測LI較PCNA或CyclinD1單獨檢測LI能更為準確地反映腦膠質瘤噁性程度及患者預後,可作為評估腦膠質瘤噁性程度及患者預後的輔助指標.
목적 탐토세포주기소D1(CyclinD1)화증식세포핵항원(PCNA)재뇌효질류중적연합검측여해종류악성정도급환자예후적상관성.방법 채용면역조화SP법연합검측63례뇌효질류조직중CyclinD1화PCNA표체수평,병행림상수방,대비분석뇌효질류불동병리분급화불동생존기조간CyclinD1화PCNA단독검측표기지수(LI)급연합검측LI적차이.결과 PCNA화CyclinD1연합검측LI수착뇌효질류악성정도적증고이증대,각급별간연합검측LI적차이균유현저성(P<0.05).동시해연합검측LI수착뇌효질류환자생존기한적연장이감소,불동생존기조문적연합검측LI균유현저성차이(P<0.05).결론 CyclinD1화PCNA연합검측LI교PCNA혹CyclinD1단독검측LI능경위준학지반영뇌효질류악성정도급환자예후,가작위평고뇌효질류악성정도급환자예후적보조지표.
Objective To investigate the coexpression of CyclinD1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in gliomas and find out its correlation with glioma pathological grades and prognosis. Methods SP immunohistochemical method was used to detect the coexpression of CyclinD1 and PCNA in 63 patients with glioma. All cases were followed up. The labeling index (LI) of CyclinD1 or/and PCNA was compared in different glioma pathological grades and survival periods.Results The LI of CyclinD1 and PCNA was increased with the increase of glioma grades, and there were significant differences among different glioma grades (P<0.05). While the LI of CyclinD1 and PCNA was decreased with the prolonging of survival period, and there were significant differences among different survival periods (P<0.05). Conclusions The LI of CyclinD1 and PCNA is more accurate than the one of CyclinD1 or PCNA alone when used for evaluating glioma grades and prognosis,so it can be a diagnostic index for the evaluation of glioma grades and prognosis.