CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较2种不同的护理干预方法对诺维本静脉外渗的处理效果,探索有效的诺维本静脉外渗的护理干预方法.方法将2002年1月至2009年6月采用诺维本进行化疗发生静脉外渗的患者40例,随机分为对照组与观察组各20例,分别采用早期封闭法和非封闭法进行处理,比较2组治疗效果.结果观察组治疗效果显著优于对照组.结论诺维本外渗早期局部应用药物注射加冷湿敷及24 h后行微波理疗,比早期采用封闭疗法能明显缩短疼痛、肿胀消退时间,值得临床推广应用.
목적 비교2충불동적호리간예방법대낙유본정맥외삼적처리효과,탐색유효적낙유본정맥외삼적호리간예방법.방법 장2002년1월지2009년6월채용낙유본진행화료발생정맥외삼적환자40례,수궤분위대조조여관찰조각20례,분별채용조기봉폐법화비봉폐법진행처리,비교2조치료효과.결과 관찰조치료효과현저우우대조조.결론 낙유본외삼조기국부응용약물주사가랭습부급24 h후행미파리료,비조기채용봉폐요법능명현축단동통、종창소퇴시간,치득림상추엄응용.
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of two different intervention methods in the treatment of Navelbine leakage.Methods 40 cases with Navelbine leakage were collected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group in equal number.Local block therapy in earlier period was used in the control group,and non-local block therapy was adopted in the observation group.Then the therapeutic effects of the two methods were compared.Results The differences of effect between the observation group and the control group were significant.Conclusions Local medicine injection in earlier period,wet compress and microwave physiotherapy after 24 hours is more effective than the local block in earlier period in the treatment of Navelbine leakage.It may shorten the time of pain and detumesccnce obviously,so it is worth popularizing clinically.