中国综合临床
中國綜閤臨床
중국종합림상
CLINICAL MEDICINE OF CHINA
2009年
9期
904-907
,共4页
王玲%倪兆慧%何奔%刘建平%杜勇平%宋玮%卜军%戴惠莉%吴青伟
王玲%倪兆慧%何奔%劉建平%杜勇平%宋瑋%蔔軍%戴惠莉%吳青偉
왕령%예조혜%하분%류건평%두용평%송위%복군%대혜리%오청위
尿N-乙酰-β-D氨基葡萄糖酐酶%尿视黄醇结合蛋白%造影剂肾病%冠状动脉造影术
尿N-乙酰-β-D氨基葡萄糖酐酶%尿視黃醇結閤蛋白%造影劑腎病%冠狀動脈造影術
뇨N-을선-β-D안기포도당항매%뇨시황순결합단백%조영제신병%관상동맥조영술
Urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase%Urinary retinol binding protein%Contrast inducednephropathy%Coronary angiography
目的 前瞻性研究冠状动脉介入诊疗术后,尿N-乙酰-β-D氨基葡萄糖酐酶(UNAG)和尿视黄醇结合蛋白(URBP)在造影剂所致急性肾损伤发生前后的差异.方法 收集150例接受冠状动脉造影及介入治疗患者的临床资料.留取患者术前、术后24 h、术后48~72 h尿液和血液.用酶法测血清肌酐(SCr)和尿肌酐(UCr)值;用ELISA法检测UNAG和URBP水平.手术后48~72 h SCr上升基础值的25%或绝对值上升44 μmol/L以上诊断为造影剂肾病(CIN)13例,选择性别、年龄、冠状动脉造影结果 等基础资料匹配的27例为对照组.结果 接受冠状动脉造影及介入治疗患者的CIN发病率为8.7%(13/150).CIN组术前UNAG/UCr水平明显高于对照组[1.97(1.06,2.64)U/mmol与1.07(0.68,1.88)U/mmol,Z=2.076,P=0.039];术后24 h CIN组患者UNAG/UCr值较术前显著上升[2.82(1.88,4.26)U/mmol与1.97(1.06,2.64)U/mmol,Z=2.607,P=0.009];ROC分析显示术前基础UNAG值可用于CIN预测,曲线下面积达0.776(P=0.023);截断值为8.08 U/L时,诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为0.771和0.713.基线UNAG高于8.08 U/L的比例在CIN组中明显高于对照组[77.1%(10/13)与29.6%(8/27),Z=2.564,P=0.011],与发病的相对危险度为5.58,95%GI为1.24~25.08.结论 UNAG检测可用于CIN患病危险度的预测,并且术后24 h水平可用于CIN的早期诊断.
目的 前瞻性研究冠狀動脈介入診療術後,尿N-乙酰-β-D氨基葡萄糖酐酶(UNAG)和尿視黃醇結閤蛋白(URBP)在造影劑所緻急性腎損傷髮生前後的差異.方法 收集150例接受冠狀動脈造影及介入治療患者的臨床資料.留取患者術前、術後24 h、術後48~72 h尿液和血液.用酶法測血清肌酐(SCr)和尿肌酐(UCr)值;用ELISA法檢測UNAG和URBP水平.手術後48~72 h SCr上升基礎值的25%或絕對值上升44 μmol/L以上診斷為造影劑腎病(CIN)13例,選擇性彆、年齡、冠狀動脈造影結果 等基礎資料匹配的27例為對照組.結果 接受冠狀動脈造影及介入治療患者的CIN髮病率為8.7%(13/150).CIN組術前UNAG/UCr水平明顯高于對照組[1.97(1.06,2.64)U/mmol與1.07(0.68,1.88)U/mmol,Z=2.076,P=0.039];術後24 h CIN組患者UNAG/UCr值較術前顯著上升[2.82(1.88,4.26)U/mmol與1.97(1.06,2.64)U/mmol,Z=2.607,P=0.009];ROC分析顯示術前基礎UNAG值可用于CIN預測,麯線下麵積達0.776(P=0.023);截斷值為8.08 U/L時,診斷的敏感性和特異性分彆為0.771和0.713.基線UNAG高于8.08 U/L的比例在CIN組中明顯高于對照組[77.1%(10/13)與29.6%(8/27),Z=2.564,P=0.011],與髮病的相對危險度為5.58,95%GI為1.24~25.08.結論 UNAG檢測可用于CIN患病危險度的預測,併且術後24 h水平可用于CIN的早期診斷.
목적 전첨성연구관상동맥개입진료술후,뇨N-을선-β-D안기포도당항매(UNAG)화뇨시황순결합단백(URBP)재조영제소치급성신손상발생전후적차이.방법 수집150례접수관상동맥조영급개입치료환자적림상자료.류취환자술전、술후24 h、술후48~72 h뇨액화혈액.용매법측혈청기항(SCr)화뇨기항(UCr)치;용ELISA법검측UNAG화URBP수평.수술후48~72 h SCr상승기출치적25%혹절대치상승44 μmol/L이상진단위조영제신병(CIN)13례,선택성별、년령、관상동맥조영결과 등기출자료필배적27례위대조조.결과 접수관상동맥조영급개입치료환자적CIN발병솔위8.7%(13/150).CIN조술전UNAG/UCr수평명현고우대조조[1.97(1.06,2.64)U/mmol여1.07(0.68,1.88)U/mmol,Z=2.076,P=0.039];술후24 h CIN조환자UNAG/UCr치교술전현저상승[2.82(1.88,4.26)U/mmol여1.97(1.06,2.64)U/mmol,Z=2.607,P=0.009];ROC분석현시술전기출UNAG치가용우CIN예측,곡선하면적체0.776(P=0.023);절단치위8.08 U/L시,진단적민감성화특이성분별위0.771화0.713.기선UNAG고우8.08 U/L적비례재CIN조중명현고우대조조[77.1%(10/13)여29.6%(8/27),Z=2.564,P=0.011],여발병적상대위험도위5.58,95%GI위1.24~25.08.결론 UNAG검측가용우CIN환병위험도적예측,병차술후24 h수평가용우CIN적조기진단.
Objective To prospectively study the difference of urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase( UN-AG) and retinol binding protein(URBP) in contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Methods The clinical data of 150 patients undergoing coronary angiography were documented. The urine and blood samples before,24 hours after and 48~72 hours after the procedure were collected;Serum creatinine (SCr) and urinary ereatinine (UCr)were tested by enzymic method. UNAG and URBP were tested by ELISA in CIN and control group. CIN was defined as an increase in SCr of ≥44 μmol/L or >25% from baseline 48 ~72 h after the procedure. 27 age- , sex- , results of coro-nary angiography-matched cases were taken as control group. Results CIN was diagnosed in 13 of 150 patients (8.7%). In CIN group, UNAG/UCr were significantly higher than that in control group[ 1.97 (1.06,2.64) U/mmol vs 1.07 (0, 68,1.88 ) U/mmol, Z = 2.076, P = 0.039 ] before ;24 hours after the procedure, UNAG/UCr was signifi-cantly up-regulated in CIN group from baseline level [ 2.82 ( 1.88 ,4.26) U/mmol vs 1.97 (1.06,2.64) U/mmol, Z =2.607,P =0. 009]. ROC curve analysis showed that baseline UNAG could be used as an early predictor for CIN, the AUC =0. 776 ,P =0.023 ;when cut off value = 8.08 U/L,the sensitivity and specificity of UNAG were 0. 771 and 0. 713 respectively. The percentage of patients of UNAG over 8.08 U/L in CIN group was significantly higher than that in control group[77.1% (10/13) vs 29.6% (8/27) ,Z =2. 564,P =0. 011 ] ,the related risk factor is 5.58,95% CI was 1.24 ~ 25.08. Conclusion UNAG could be used as a predictor of CIN before the procedure and its postprocedure 24 h level maybe useful in early diagnosis after the procedure.