CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较外周静脉穿刺中两种不同拔针方法的临床效果,明确非按压拔针法的安全性、高效性和可行性.方法 80例患者随机分成非按压拔针组和传统拔针组,对其临床效果进行比较.结果相对于传统拔针法,非按压拔针法在患者疼痛感、皮肤出血、皮下淤血、所需时间、满意度等方面均优于传统拔针法.结论非按压拔针法比传统法更有利于提高工作效率,减轻患者的痛苦,提高患者的满意度,有更高的安全性和可行性.
목적 비교외주정맥천자중량충불동발침방법적림상효과,명학비안압발침법적안전성、고효성화가행성.방법 80례환자수궤분성비안압발침조화전통발침조,대기림상효과진행비교.결과 상대우전통발침법,비안압발침법재환자동통감、피부출혈、피하어혈、소수시간、만의도등방면균우우전통발침법.결론 비안압발침법비전통법경유리우제고공작효솔,감경환자적통고,제고환자적만의도,유경고적안전성화가행성.
Objective To compare the clinical effects of none-pulling out stitches between press pulling out method and traditional one among peripheral intravenous injection, to present the safety, high efficiency and feasibility of the press pulling out method.Methods A total of 80 patients were randomly divided into the press pull needle and traditional pull needle groups, the clinical effect were compared.Results Compared with the traditional pull out, none-press method showed better in reducing pain, the skin and subcutaneous bleeding congestion, time, satisfaction.Conclusions The none-press than traditional method is more conducive to work efficiency, reduce the suffering of patients, improve patient satisfaction and have more safety and feasibility.