CAJ | 학술논문

　　为了解决传统CCR模型不能对决策单元进行充分排序的难题，介绍了四种DEA模型，包括自评型、竞争型、合作型、竞合型DEA。分析每种模型的功能与现实意义，由于单独使用每种模型评价决策单元效率都存在一定的片面性，因此本文采用熵值法来确定四种方法的权重，综合考虑不同DEA模型的评价结论，从而能够对决策单元进行充分排序。文末通过一个算例来证明方法的有效性。
　　위료해결전통CCR모형불능대결책단원진행충분배서적난제，개소료사충DEA모형，포괄자평형、경쟁형、합작형、경합형DEA。분석매충모형적공능여현실의의，유우단독사용매충모형평개결책단원효솔도존재일정적편면성，인차본문채용적치법래학정사충방법적권중，종합고필불동DEA모형적평개결론，종이능구대결책단원진행충분배서。문말통과일개산례래증명방법적유효성。
In order to solve the problem that traditional CCR model can't rank decision making units fully, this paper introduces four kinds of DEA models including self-evaluation type, competition type, cooperation type and cooperative competition type DEA, analyses the function of each model and its practical significance. Since each model has certain one-sidedness, this paper uses entropy value method to determine the weight of the four kinds of methods, so as to be able to rank decision making unit fully. At the end of the article, an example is used to prove the effectiveness of the method.