中华护理教育
中華護理教育
중화호리교육
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION
2009年
7期
291-294
,共4页
林平%李玲%万飞%杨巧绘
林平%李玲%萬飛%楊巧繪
림평%리령%만비%양교회
基于问题的学习%教育考核%评价研究
基于問題的學習%教育攷覈%評價研究
기우문제적학습%교육고핵%평개연구
Problem-Based Learning%Educational Measurement%Evaluation Studies
目的 探讨基于问题的学习(PBL)中护理本科生表现的自评、互评和教师评价情况及三者之间的关系.方法 2008年对哈尔滨医科大学2006级护理本科生的内科护理学课程进行了PBL教学改革,109名护生和22名指导教师对学生在5个PBL案例中的学习表现进行了评价,包括自评、互评和教师评,比较3种评价方式间的差别,并进行三者之间的相关性检验.结果 3种评价方式的总分和5方面得分均为自评>互评>教师评;除自评-互评在准备方面比较差异无统计学意义外,3种评价方式在总分及其余各方面的两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),一致性检验的ICC值在0.06-0.14之间.自评与教师评在总分及4个方面均存在一定程度的相关性,互评与教师评在准备方面存在低度正相关.自评与互评在交流技能方面存在低度负相关.结论 不同评价者对PBL教学中学生表现的评价存在一定差异,护理教育者应构建完善的评价系统,对学生的表现进行客观、真实、有效的评价.
目的 探討基于問題的學習(PBL)中護理本科生錶現的自評、互評和教師評價情況及三者之間的關繫.方法 2008年對哈爾濱醫科大學2006級護理本科生的內科護理學課程進行瞭PBL教學改革,109名護生和22名指導教師對學生在5箇PBL案例中的學習錶現進行瞭評價,包括自評、互評和教師評,比較3種評價方式間的差彆,併進行三者之間的相關性檢驗.結果 3種評價方式的總分和5方麵得分均為自評>互評>教師評;除自評-互評在準備方麵比較差異無統計學意義外,3種評價方式在總分及其餘各方麵的兩兩比較差異均有統計學意義(P均<0.05),一緻性檢驗的ICC值在0.06-0.14之間.自評與教師評在總分及4箇方麵均存在一定程度的相關性,互評與教師評在準備方麵存在低度正相關.自評與互評在交流技能方麵存在低度負相關.結論 不同評價者對PBL教學中學生錶現的評價存在一定差異,護理教育者應構建完善的評價繫統,對學生的錶現進行客觀、真實、有效的評價.
목적 탐토기우문제적학습(PBL)중호리본과생표현적자평、호평화교사평개정황급삼자지간적관계.방법 2008년대합이빈의과대학2006급호리본과생적내과호이학과정진행료PBL교학개혁,109명호생화22명지도교사대학생재5개PBL안례중적학습표현진행료평개,포괄자평、호평화교사평,비교3충평개방식간적차별,병진행삼자지간적상관성검험.결과 3충평개방식적총분화5방면득분균위자평>호평>교사평;제자평-호평재준비방면비교차이무통계학의의외,3충평개방식재총분급기여각방면적량량비교차이균유통계학의의(P균<0.05),일치성검험적ICC치재0.06-0.14지간.자평여교사평재총분급4개방면균존재일정정도적상관성,호평여교사평재준비방면존재저도정상관.자평여호평재교류기능방면존재저도부상관.결론 불동평개자대PBL교학중학생표현적평개존재일정차이,호리교육자응구건완선적평개계통,대학생적표현진행객관、진실、유효적평개.
Objective To identify the self,peer,and faculty assessments of student performance in a problem-based learning (PBL) course,and analyze the relationships among them. Methods We reformed the teaching and assessment methods among undergraduate nursing students in 2008 and assessed the student performance by self,peer and faculty. We compared the three assessment types and measured the association among them. Results There existed a self>peer>facuhy relationship in terms of the total and five domains of the three types and the pairwise comparisons among them showed statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) ranged from 0.06 to 0.14. Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that the correlation of the total and four domains of self-faculty were significant. For the preparation score,the peer-faculty correlation existed weak positive association,and the self-peer correlation on communication was low negative associ-ation. Conchusions The effects of the three rating types were different significantly,we should set up a diversified assessment system to evaluate the student performance objectively and effectively.