CAJ | 학술논문

目的研究前瞻性心电门控触发(prospective ECG-triggering)与回顾性心电门控(retrosp-ective ECG gating)两种技术方法行冠状动脉CTA检查时,对冠状动脉图像质量及辐射剂量的比较.方法 33名疑似冠状动脉疾病的患者分两组进行对比研究.前瞻组16例为前瞻性心电门控成像,心率小于65次/min;回顾组17例为回顾性心电门控成像,心率小于75次/min.记录两组的辐射剂量并统计分析,同时进行图像质量评价.结果两组图像质量比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05).前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉CTA的平均DLP 234.4 mGy·cm,占回顾性心电门控冠状动脉CTA的平均DLP 974.4 mGy·cm的24.1%.前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉CTA的患者的平均有效剂量为3.2 mSy,回顾心电门控冠状动脉CTA患者的为13.6 mSv,降低76.47%.结论 64排螺旋CT在前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉CTA与回顾性心电门控冠状动脉CTA比较可以获得相似的图像质量,可大幅降低患者的有效剂量对于不能接受高辐射剂量且心率较低的受检人群具有重要的临床价值.
목적 연구전첨성심전문공촉발(prospective ECG-triggering)여회고성심전문공(retrosp-ective ECG gating)량충기술방법행관상동맥CTA검사시,대관상동맥도상질량급복사제량적비교.방법 33명의사관상동맥질병적환자분량조진행대비연구.전첨조16례위전첨성심전문공성상,심솔소우65차/min;회고조17례위회고성심전문공성상,심솔소우75차/min.기록량조적복사제량병통계분석,동시진행도상질량평개.결과 량조도상질량비교,차이무통계학의의(P0.05).전첨성심전문공관상동맥CTA적평균DLP 234.4 mGy·cm,점회고성심전문공관상동맥CTA적평균DLP 974.4 mGy·cm적24.1%.전첨성심전문공관상동맥CTA적환자적평균유효제량위3.2 mSy,회고심전문공관상동맥CTA환자적위13.6 mSv,강저76.47%.결론 64배라선CT재전첨성심전문공관상동맥CTA여회고성심전문공관상동맥CTA비교가이획득상사적도상질량,가대폭강저환자적유효제량대우불능접수고복사제량차심솔교저적수검인군구유중요적림상개치.
Objective To compare the image quality and radiation dose between prospective ECG-trigering and retrospective ECG gating technique in coronary artery imaging. Methods 33 patients suspected coronary artery disease were included in this study and divided into experimental group (prospective ECG-triggering coronary artery imaging, heart rate < 65 bpm, 16 patients)and control group (retrospective ECG gating coronary artery imaging, heart rate < 75 bpm, 17 patients). Radiation dose was recorded for statistical analysis. At the same time, image quality was evaluated. Results There were no significant differences in image quality 3.2 msy. Effective dose reduced 76.47 %. Conclusions Prospective ECG gating coronary artery imaging can obtain the similar image quality compared with prospective ECG gating coronary artery imaging but the effective dose reduced 76.47 %. Prospective ECG gating coronary artery imaging has clinical value to peoples who are able to not accept high radiation dose and with low heart rate.