中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2011年
6期
513-515
,共3页
社交恐怖障碍%执行功能%工作记忆
社交恐怖障礙%執行功能%工作記憶
사교공포장애%집행공능%공작기억
Social phobia%Executive functions%Working memory
探讨社交恐怖障碍患者的执行功能、工作记忆能力与正常对照组的差异.方法 采用威斯康星分类卡片测验(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test,WSCT)以及数字广度、空间广度、多图形空间广度测验对42名社交恐怖障碍患者和42名健康对照者的执行功能、工作记忆能力进行评估.结果 在WSCT测验中,社交恐怖障碍患者非持续错误数明显高于对照组[分别为(18.75±6.20)分,(8.89±3.22)分],差异具有统计学意义.社交恐怖障碍患者工作记忆能力测验中数字广度[分别为(7.25±1.35)分,(8.03 ±2.30)分]、空间广度[分别为(6.11±1.85)分,(8.61±2.87)分]以及多图形空间广度[分别为(4.03±1.39)分,(5.18±1.07)分]成绩均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义.结论 社交恐怖障碍患者存在工作记忆受损,而这可能是社交恐怖障碍患者学业以及社会功能不良的神经心理学机制.
探討社交恐怖障礙患者的執行功能、工作記憶能力與正常對照組的差異.方法 採用威斯康星分類卡片測驗(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test,WSCT)以及數字廣度、空間廣度、多圖形空間廣度測驗對42名社交恐怖障礙患者和42名健康對照者的執行功能、工作記憶能力進行評估.結果 在WSCT測驗中,社交恐怖障礙患者非持續錯誤數明顯高于對照組[分彆為(18.75±6.20)分,(8.89±3.22)分],差異具有統計學意義.社交恐怖障礙患者工作記憶能力測驗中數字廣度[分彆為(7.25±1.35)分,(8.03 ±2.30)分]、空間廣度[分彆為(6.11±1.85)分,(8.61±2.87)分]以及多圖形空間廣度[分彆為(4.03±1.39)分,(5.18±1.07)分]成績均低于對照組,差異具有統計學意義.結論 社交恐怖障礙患者存在工作記憶受損,而這可能是社交恐怖障礙患者學業以及社會功能不良的神經心理學機製.
탐토사교공포장애환자적집행공능、공작기억능력여정상대조조적차이.방법 채용위사강성분류잡편측험(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test,WSCT)이급수자엄도、공간엄도、다도형공간엄도측험대42명사교공포장애환자화42명건강대조자적집행공능、공작기억능력진행평고.결과 재WSCT측험중,사교공포장애환자비지속착오수명현고우대조조[분별위(18.75±6.20)분,(8.89±3.22)분],차이구유통계학의의.사교공포장애환자공작기억능력측험중수자엄도[분별위(7.25±1.35)분,(8.03 ±2.30)분]、공간엄도[분별위(6.11±1.85)분,(8.61±2.87)분]이급다도형공간엄도[분별위(4.03±1.39)분,(5.18±1.07)분]성적균저우대조조,차이구유통계학의의.결론 사교공포장애환자존재공작기억수손,이저가능시사교공포장애환자학업이급사회공능불량적신경심이학궤제.
Objective To explore the executive function and working memory ability of patients with social phobia. Methods The study included 42 social phobia patients whose age, sex, and level of education were matched with those of a healthy control group. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Digit Span, Spatial Span, Multiple-Objects-Spatial span were used to study the executive function and working memory. Results Patients with social phobia scored higher than the control group in terms of the number of non perseverative errors on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test ( 18. 75 ± 6. 20, 8. 89 ± 3. 22 respectively ). No differences were observed in perseverative errors and other scores between the patient and control group. Patients with social phobia scored lower than the control group in terms of Digit Span(7.25 ±1.35,8.03 ±2. 30 respectively) ,Spatial Span(6. 11±1.85,8.61 ±2.87 respectively) and Multiple-Objects-Spatial span(4.03 ± 1. 39 ,5. 18 ± 1.07 respectively). Conclusion Working memory ability in the social phobia patients is impaired, and this may cause the poor performance in patients with the social phobia in academic and social working.
