现代口腔医学杂志
現代口腔醫學雜誌
현대구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF MODERN STOMATOLOGY
2009年
6期
600-603
,共4页
陶建祥%陈建荣%依田正信
陶建祥%陳建榮%依田正信
도건상%진건영%의전정신
边缘精度%泽康全瓷冠%颈缘弯曲度%肩台形态
邊緣精度%澤康全瓷冠%頸緣彎麯度%肩檯形態
변연정도%택강전자관%경연만곡도%견태형태
Marginal fit%All-ceramic crowns%CAD/CAM%Finish line
目的 调查不同颈缘弯曲度和肩台形态的泽康CAD/CAM全瓷冠的边缘精度.方法 准备6种不同形态的基牙(弯曲度:1mm,3mm,5mm;肩台外形:圆弧肩台,直角肩台).制作30个泽康CAD/CAM全瓷冠(每种肩台各5个),测定陶瓷基底冠和全瓷冠的边缘缝隙.采用双因子ANOVA分析后用T检验测定有无统计学差异.结果 弯曲度1mm,3mm,5mm圆弧肩台的泽康全瓷冠的边缘缝隙分别为51(21)μm,53(22)μm,54(20)μm.弯曲度1mm,3mm,5mm直角肩台的泽康全瓷冠的边缘缝隙分别为49(18)μm,51(19)μm,50(22)μm.统计结果显示6种基牙之间没有显著性差异.结论 泽康全瓷冠有良好的边缘精度,颈缘弯曲度和肩台形态对泽康全瓷冠的边缘精度没有显著影响.
目的 調查不同頸緣彎麯度和肩檯形態的澤康CAD/CAM全瓷冠的邊緣精度.方法 準備6種不同形態的基牙(彎麯度:1mm,3mm,5mm;肩檯外形:圓弧肩檯,直角肩檯).製作30箇澤康CAD/CAM全瓷冠(每種肩檯各5箇),測定陶瓷基底冠和全瓷冠的邊緣縫隙.採用雙因子ANOVA分析後用T檢驗測定有無統計學差異.結果 彎麯度1mm,3mm,5mm圓弧肩檯的澤康全瓷冠的邊緣縫隙分彆為51(21)μm,53(22)μm,54(20)μm.彎麯度1mm,3mm,5mm直角肩檯的澤康全瓷冠的邊緣縫隙分彆為49(18)μm,51(19)μm,50(22)μm.統計結果顯示6種基牙之間沒有顯著性差異.結論 澤康全瓷冠有良好的邊緣精度,頸緣彎麯度和肩檯形態對澤康全瓷冠的邊緣精度沒有顯著影響.
목적 조사불동경연만곡도화견태형태적택강CAD/CAM전자관적변연정도.방법 준비6충불동형태적기아(만곡도:1mm,3mm,5mm;견태외형:원호견태,직각견태).제작30개택강CAD/CAM전자관(매충견태각5개),측정도자기저관화전자관적변연봉극.채용쌍인자ANOVA분석후용T검험측정유무통계학차이.결과 만곡도1mm,3mm,5mm원호견태적택강전자관적변연봉극분별위51(21)μm,53(22)μm,54(20)μm.만곡도1mm,3mm,5mm직각견태적택강전자관적변연봉극분별위49(18)μm,51(19)μm,50(22)μm.통계결과현시6충기아지간몰유현저성차이.결론 택강전자관유량호적변연정도,경연만곡도화견태형태대택강전자관적변연정도몰유현저영향.
Objective To evaluate the marginal fit of Cercon all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns with different finish line curvature and margin in vitro.Methods Six groups of abutments (finish line curvature: 1mm, 3mm and 5mm, margin shape: chamfer and shoulder) were prepared. Thirty all-ceramic crowns were fabricated (five for each group). The marginal gaps of copings and veneered crowns were measured respectively. The data were calculated and analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α=0.05).Results The mean marginal gaps and their standard difference (SD) of veneered crowns for 1mm, 3mm and 5mm-curvature-chamfer were 51 and 21μm, 53 and 22μm, 54 and 20μm respectively. The mean marginal gaps and their SD of veneered crowns for 1mm, 3mm and 5mm-curvature-shoulder were 49 and 18μm, 51 and 19μm, and 50 and 22μm respectively. There was no significant difference on the marginal gaps among six groups of abutments.Conclusion The marginal gaps of Cercon all-ceramic crowns were within the range of clinically acceptable values. The abutment finish line curvature and shape had no significant influence on the marginal fit of Cercon all-ceramic crowns.