中华普通外科杂志
中華普通外科雜誌
중화보통외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY
2011年
9期
739-742
,共4页
段伟宏%周宁新%王知非%孙强%谢于%董静逊%刘全达%陈军周
段偉宏%週寧新%王知非%孫彊%謝于%董靜遜%劉全達%陳軍週
단위굉%주저신%왕지비%손강%사우%동정손%류전체%진군주
胆囊肿瘤%肿瘤分期%黄疸%外科手术
膽囊腫瘤%腫瘤分期%黃疸%外科手術
담낭종류%종류분기%황달%외과수술
Gallbladder neoplasms%Neoplasms staging%Jaundice%Surgical procedures,operative
目的 探讨扩大的手术方式对胆囊癌NevinⅣ期患者R0切除率及患者中位生存期的影响。方法 将91例NevinⅣ期胆囊癌患者分为胆囊底体部痛和胆囊颈部癌,分别施行扩大清扫术、常规清扫术及姑息手术,并对中位生存期、淋巴结转移率、R0切除率等指标进行比较。计量资料采用重复测量方差分析或配对t检验,计数资料采用配对x2检验。结果 扩大清扫术组中位生存期(月)明显高于常规手术组和姑息手术组,胆囊底体部癌的中位生存期分别为(27.1±2.4)、(10.7±2.2)、(4.7±2.2)个月,胆囊颈部癌的中位生存期分别为(8.5±2.1)、(6.7±1.9)、(3.1±1.1)个月;胆囊底体部癌和颈部癌的R0切除率不同,胆囊底体部癌的扩大清扫术和常规手术RO切除率分别为16/18(88%)和7/12(58%),胆囊颈部癌的扩大清扫术和常规清扫术RO切除率分别为6/16(38%)和3/13(23%);胆囊底体部癌和胆囊颈部癌淋巴结转移率分别为:No.12a (64%,81%,P=0.088),No.12b(58%,83%,P=0.01),No.13( 32%,70%,P=0.000),No.14( 17%,18%,P=0.961),No.16(12%,17%,P=0.392),No.8a(28%,41%,P=0.215) No.8p(22%,42%,P=0.051)。结论 NevinⅣ期胆囊底体部癌扩大清扫术的中位生存期、RO切除率等均高于胆囊颈部癌。
目的 探討擴大的手術方式對膽囊癌NevinⅣ期患者R0切除率及患者中位生存期的影響。方法 將91例NevinⅣ期膽囊癌患者分為膽囊底體部痛和膽囊頸部癌,分彆施行擴大清掃術、常規清掃術及姑息手術,併對中位生存期、淋巴結轉移率、R0切除率等指標進行比較。計量資料採用重複測量方差分析或配對t檢驗,計數資料採用配對x2檢驗。結果 擴大清掃術組中位生存期(月)明顯高于常規手術組和姑息手術組,膽囊底體部癌的中位生存期分彆為(27.1±2.4)、(10.7±2.2)、(4.7±2.2)箇月,膽囊頸部癌的中位生存期分彆為(8.5±2.1)、(6.7±1.9)、(3.1±1.1)箇月;膽囊底體部癌和頸部癌的R0切除率不同,膽囊底體部癌的擴大清掃術和常規手術RO切除率分彆為16/18(88%)和7/12(58%),膽囊頸部癌的擴大清掃術和常規清掃術RO切除率分彆為6/16(38%)和3/13(23%);膽囊底體部癌和膽囊頸部癌淋巴結轉移率分彆為:No.12a (64%,81%,P=0.088),No.12b(58%,83%,P=0.01),No.13( 32%,70%,P=0.000),No.14( 17%,18%,P=0.961),No.16(12%,17%,P=0.392),No.8a(28%,41%,P=0.215) No.8p(22%,42%,P=0.051)。結論 NevinⅣ期膽囊底體部癌擴大清掃術的中位生存期、RO切除率等均高于膽囊頸部癌。
목적 탐토확대적수술방식대담낭암NevinⅣ기환자R0절제솔급환자중위생존기적영향。방법 장91례NevinⅣ기담낭암환자분위담낭저체부통화담낭경부암,분별시행확대청소술、상규청소술급고식수술,병대중위생존기、림파결전이솔、R0절제솔등지표진행비교。계량자료채용중복측량방차분석혹배대t검험,계수자료채용배대x2검험。결과 확대청소술조중위생존기(월)명현고우상규수술조화고식수술조,담낭저체부암적중위생존기분별위(27.1±2.4)、(10.7±2.2)、(4.7±2.2)개월,담낭경부암적중위생존기분별위(8.5±2.1)、(6.7±1.9)、(3.1±1.1)개월;담낭저체부암화경부암적R0절제솔불동,담낭저체부암적확대청소술화상규수술RO절제솔분별위16/18(88%)화7/12(58%),담낭경부암적확대청소술화상규청소술RO절제솔분별위6/16(38%)화3/13(23%);담낭저체부암화담낭경부암림파결전이솔분별위:No.12a (64%,81%,P=0.088),No.12b(58%,83%,P=0.01),No.13( 32%,70%,P=0.000),No.14( 17%,18%,P=0.961),No.16(12%,17%,P=0.392),No.8a(28%,41%,P=0.215) No.8p(22%,42%,P=0.051)。결론 NevinⅣ기담낭저체부암확대청소술적중위생존기、RO절제솔등균고우담낭경부암。
Objective To explore the value of expanded radical resection for gallbladder cancer located respectively at body and bottom of the gallbladder and at the neck.Methods In this study,91 cases of gallbladder cancer were macropathologically divided into two groups, one with the lesion at the body and bottom of the gallbladder and the other at the neck, survival analysis was made accordingly. Three different kinds of resection were performed: the expanded radical resection, the standard radical resection and palliative operation. Results The overall median survival rate of patients undergoing expanded radical operation was significantly longer than that of the cases doing other two procedures, that was 27. 1 ± 2. 4,10. 7 ±2. 2,4. 7 ±2.2 (months) respectively for body and bottom cancer, and 8.5 ±2. 1,6. 7 ± 1.9,3.1 ± 1.1 (months) respectively for neck cancer. For cancer at the body and bottom RO was achieved by expanded radical resection in 16/18(88% ) cases and by standard radical resection in 7/12(58% ) cases, while for cancer at the neck it was in 6/16(38% ) cases, and in 3/13 (23%)cases only. Conclusions The median survival time is longer and RO resection rate is higher in patients with the cancer at the body and bottom than these at the neck of the gallbladder.