中华内分泌外科杂志
中華內分泌外科雜誌
중화내분비외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINE SURGERY
2011年
3期
167-169
,共3页
王玉龙%董海燕%李庆%袁凯%陈守华%付荣湛
王玉龍%董海燕%李慶%袁凱%陳守華%付榮湛
왕옥룡%동해연%리경%원개%진수화%부영담
乳腺肿瘤%可疑淋巴结取样%前哨淋巴结活检%假阴性率%腋窝淋巴结清扫术
乳腺腫瘤%可疑淋巴結取樣%前哨淋巴結活檢%假陰性率%腋窩淋巴結清掃術
유선종류%가의림파결취양%전초림파결활검%가음성솔%액와림파결청소술
Breast neoplasms%Suspicious lymph node biopsy%Sentinel lymph node biopsy%False negative rate%axillary lymph nodes dissection
目的 探讨早期乳腺癌更为合理的腋窝淋巴结处理方法,明确腋窝可疑淋巴结取样结合前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)替代单纯SLNB时的假阴性率是否明显降低,为临床应用提供依据.方法 采用传统的腋窝淋巴结外科学分群方法,对符合入组条件的42例早期乳腺癌患者术前行B超引导下钩丝定位,术中行腋窝SLNB和定位的可疑淋巴结活检,再行全腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)或level II水平的腋淋巴结清扫,对SLN、可疑淋巴结、腋窝其余的淋巴结分3组行病理检查,比较单纯SLNB与SLNB配合可疑淋巴结取样活检预测腋淋巴结状态的差异.结果 SLNB总成功率为100%(42/42),SLNB 2例假阴性,假阴性率11%(2/18),敏感性88.9%(16/18),准确率95.2%(40/42).SLNB配合可疑淋巴结活检预测腋淋巴结状态未见假阴性,敏感性100%(18/18),准确率100%(42/42).结论 超声引导可疑淋巴结钩丝定位取样有降低乳腺癌SLNB假阴性率的趋势,但本组样本数少,差异无统计学意义(P=0.250 0).
目的 探討早期乳腺癌更為閤理的腋窩淋巴結處理方法,明確腋窩可疑淋巴結取樣結閤前哨淋巴結活檢(SLNB)替代單純SLNB時的假陰性率是否明顯降低,為臨床應用提供依據.方法 採用傳統的腋窩淋巴結外科學分群方法,對符閤入組條件的42例早期乳腺癌患者術前行B超引導下鉤絲定位,術中行腋窩SLNB和定位的可疑淋巴結活檢,再行全腋窩淋巴結清掃(ALND)或level II水平的腋淋巴結清掃,對SLN、可疑淋巴結、腋窩其餘的淋巴結分3組行病理檢查,比較單純SLNB與SLNB配閤可疑淋巴結取樣活檢預測腋淋巴結狀態的差異.結果 SLNB總成功率為100%(42/42),SLNB 2例假陰性,假陰性率11%(2/18),敏感性88.9%(16/18),準確率95.2%(40/42).SLNB配閤可疑淋巴結活檢預測腋淋巴結狀態未見假陰性,敏感性100%(18/18),準確率100%(42/42).結論 超聲引導可疑淋巴結鉤絲定位取樣有降低乳腺癌SLNB假陰性率的趨勢,但本組樣本數少,差異無統計學意義(P=0.250 0).
목적 탐토조기유선암경위합리적액와림파결처리방법,명학액와가의림파결취양결합전초림파결활검(SLNB)체대단순SLNB시적가음성솔시부명현강저,위림상응용제공의거.방법 채용전통적액와림파결외과학분군방법,대부합입조조건적42례조기유선암환자술전행B초인도하구사정위,술중행액와SLNB화정위적가의림파결활검,재행전액와림파결청소(ALND)혹level II수평적액림파결청소,대SLN、가의림파결、액와기여적림파결분3조행병리검사,비교단순SLNB여SLNB배합가의림파결취양활검예측액림파결상태적차이.결과 SLNB총성공솔위100%(42/42),SLNB 2례가음성,가음성솔11%(2/18),민감성88.9%(16/18),준학솔95.2%(40/42).SLNB배합가의림파결활검예측액림파결상태미견가음성,민감성100%(18/18),준학솔100%(42/42).결론 초성인도가의림파결구사정위취양유강저유선암SLNB가음성솔적추세,단본조양본수소,차이무통계학의의(P=0.250 0).
Objective To explore ideal surgical axillary management of early breast cancer,and to determine the feasibility of reducing false negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)by combination of axillary suspicious lymph node biopsy and SLNB.Methods From Jan.2008 to Oct.2009,42 consecutive cases with early breast cancer were enrolled.All patients underwent suspicious node hook-wire location by doppler ultrasonography before operation.SLNB and suspicious lymph node biopsy were performed during operation.Complete axillary nodes dissection(ALND)or level II dissection would be conducted according to the biopsy result.The difference of node status prediction between SLNB and SLNB with axillary suspicious lymph node biopsy and was compared.Results All the 42 cases successfully underwent SLNB (100%).There were 2 false negatives occurred in SLNB,resulting in false negative rate of 11%,sensitivity of 88.9%and accuracy of 95.2%in predicting axillary nodes status.By contrast,SLNB with axillary suspicious node biopsy showed a false-negative rate of 0%,sensitivity of 100%,and accuracy of 100%.Conclusions Compared to SLNB in early breast cancer,combination of suspicious node biopsy and SLAB has a tendency of reducing false negative rate.However,Because of the limited samples,the difference has no statistical significance(P=0.2500).