CAJ | 학술논문

逮捕权是程序性裁判权，国外由法院行使，逮捕疑犯必须经过正当程序，而我国是检察机关以行政决定机制行使逮捕权，不符合逮捕权司法属性，改革的关键是由中立机构以司法审查方式行使逮捕权，改革现有工作机制，推行批捕听证程序是实现这一目标的最佳途径，既能实现刑事诉讼目的，又能实现权力制衡的宪法功能，在应然上具有合理性，在实然上具有可行性。
체포권시정서성재판권，국외유법원행사，체포의범필수경과정당정서，이아국시검찰궤관이행정결정궤제행사체포권，불부합체포권사법속성，개혁적관건시유중립궤구이사법심사방식행사체포권，개혁현유공작궤제，추행비포은증정서시실현저일목표적최가도경，기능실현형사소송목적，우능실현권력제형적헌법공능，재응연상구유합이성，재실연상구유가행성。
The arrest power is a procedural jurrisdiction and performed by Court abroad, and arresting tire suspect should be bv legitimate process. ＋ However in Cbina, the procuratorate perfnrm the arrest power bY administralive decision svstenl, which doesn＇t coincide with the iudiciarv characteristics of the arrest power. Tire key to leform is that the neutral department peribllus tbe alrest power by judltiiarv examination. Tire best way to realize the aim is to reform the cun＇ent working mechanism and carry out arrest approval hearings process, which can turn the aim of criminal suit and the constitutional function of power balance into reality,and it has rationality in objectivity, and feasibility in subjectivity.