热能动力工程
熱能動力工程
열능동력공정
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THERMAL ENERGY AND POWER
2010年
1期
30-33
,共4页
汽轮发电机组%轴系标高%测试%振动%标高调整
汽輪髮電機組%軸繫標高%測試%振動%標高調整
기륜발전궤조%축계표고%측시%진동%표고조정
shafting elevation%measurement%vibration%turbo-generator unit%elevation adjustment
某电厂一台600 MW汽轮发电机组存在严重的振动不稳定隐患,在机组带负荷过程中,5号、6号轴振出现了突发性的17.5 Hz低频振动,幅值分量达170 μm.通过对该机组轴系相对标高变化、振动和油膜压力的测试分析,得出轴系标高不合理是导致机组振动失稳的主要原因之一.介绍了机组振动测试情况和轴系标高测试试验方法,结合标高检测结果,分析了该机组轴系标高随工况的变化规律.测试结果表明,从冷态到热态,4号轴承标高相对5号轴承抬高达1.180 mm.经综合分析,制定并实施了冷态下轴系标高调整方案,5号轴承相对4号轴承抬高0.9 mm,彻底解决了该机组轴系振动不稳定问题.
某電廠一檯600 MW汽輪髮電機組存在嚴重的振動不穩定隱患,在機組帶負荷過程中,5號、6號軸振齣現瞭突髮性的17.5 Hz低頻振動,幅值分量達170 μm.通過對該機組軸繫相對標高變化、振動和油膜壓力的測試分析,得齣軸繫標高不閤理是導緻機組振動失穩的主要原因之一.介紹瞭機組振動測試情況和軸繫標高測試試驗方法,結閤標高檢測結果,分析瞭該機組軸繫標高隨工況的變化規律.測試結果錶明,從冷態到熱態,4號軸承標高相對5號軸承抬高達1.180 mm.經綜閤分析,製定併實施瞭冷態下軸繫標高調整方案,5號軸承相對4號軸承抬高0.9 mm,徹底解決瞭該機組軸繫振動不穩定問題.
모전엄일태600 MW기륜발전궤조존재엄중적진동불은정은환,재궤조대부하과정중,5호、6호축진출현료돌발성적17.5 Hz저빈진동,폭치분량체170 μm.통과대해궤조축계상대표고변화、진동화유막압력적측시분석,득출축계표고불합리시도치궤조진동실은적주요원인지일.개소료궤조진동측시정황화축계표고측시시험방법,결합표고검측결과,분석료해궤조축계표고수공황적변화규률.측시결과표명,종랭태도열태,4호축승표고상대5호축승태고체1.180 mm.경종합분석,제정병실시료랭태하축계표고조정방안,5호축승상대4호축승태고0.9 mm,철저해결료해궤조축계진동불은정문제.
There exists a serious hidden trouble capable of causing an unstable vibration in a 600 MW turbo-generator unit of a power plant. During the load carrying period of the unit, a low frequency vibration at 17.5 Hz suddenly occurred to shaft No.5 and 6 with an amplitude component equaling to 170 μm. A measurement and analysis of the change of the relative levation, vibration and oil film pressure of the shafting system of the unit have induced one to conclude that the irrational elevation of the shafting system constitutes one of the main causes leading to an unstable vibration of the unit. The authors described the vibration measurement conditions of the unit and the methods for measuring and testing the shafting elevation. In conjunction with the measurements of the elevation, the law governing the change of the shafting elevation with the perating condition was analyzed. The measurement results indicate that from the cold state to the hot one, bearing No.5 is relatively elevated by 1.180 mm in comparison with bearing No.4. After a comprehensive analysis, a shafting elevation adjustment version was worked out and implemented in the cold state. Bearing No.5 was elevated by 0.9 mm relative to bearing No.4, thereby thoroughly solving the unstable vibration problem of the hafting system.