海洋渔业
海洋漁業
해양어업
MARINE FISHERIES
2009年
3期
293-299
,共7页
高露姣%楼宝%毛国民%史会来%骆季安
高露姣%樓寶%毛國民%史會來%駱季安
고로교%루보%모국민%사회래%락계안
褐牙鲆%饵料%肌肉%营养成分
褐牙鲆%餌料%肌肉%營養成分
갈아평%이료%기육%영양성분
Paralichthys olivaceus%diets%muscle%biochemical components
比较分析了分别投喂小杂鱼和人工饲料的两组褐牙鲆肌肉营养成分,旨在为褐牙鲆的营养需求研究及其饲料研制提供参考.结果显示:摄食小杂鱼组的水分含量显著低于摄食人工饲料组(P<0.05),而粗蛋白和粗脂肪含量显著高于摄食人工饲料组(P<0.05),粗灰分含量在两组间差异不显著(P>0.05);两组褐牙鲆的氨基酸组成基本一致,均含有18种氨基酸,必需氨基酸指数(EAAI)分别为71.15和70.47,其构成比例符合FAO/WHO的标准.摄食小杂鱼组褐牙鲆中检测到11种饱和脂肪酸(SFA)、6种单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)和9种多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA);摄食人工饲料组中检测到11种SFA、7种MUFA和9种PUFA.摄食小杂鱼组的∑ω3PUFA[(30.39 4±2.29)%]显著低于摄食人工饲料组[(34.40±3.32)%](P<0.05),其中小杂鱼组的EPA+DHA的总量为(29.27±2.33)%,显著低于摄食人工饲料组的(33.47±3.36)%(P<0.05);摄食小杂鱼组的∑ω6PUFA为(6.01 4±0.31)%,显著高于摄食人工饲料组的(5.06 4±0.37)%(P<0.05).综合来看,两组褐牙鲆均含有丰富的各种营养成分,摄食小杂鱼组的粗蛋白、粗脂肪和氨基酸营养较好,而摄食人工饲料组的多不饱和脂肪酸营养较好,两者各有优势.
比較分析瞭分彆投餵小雜魚和人工飼料的兩組褐牙鲆肌肉營養成分,旨在為褐牙鲆的營養需求研究及其飼料研製提供參攷.結果顯示:攝食小雜魚組的水分含量顯著低于攝食人工飼料組(P<0.05),而粗蛋白和粗脂肪含量顯著高于攝食人工飼料組(P<0.05),粗灰分含量在兩組間差異不顯著(P>0.05);兩組褐牙鲆的氨基痠組成基本一緻,均含有18種氨基痠,必需氨基痠指數(EAAI)分彆為71.15和70.47,其構成比例符閤FAO/WHO的標準.攝食小雜魚組褐牙鲆中檢測到11種飽和脂肪痠(SFA)、6種單不飽和脂肪痠(MUFA)和9種多不飽和脂肪痠(PUFA);攝食人工飼料組中檢測到11種SFA、7種MUFA和9種PUFA.攝食小雜魚組的∑ω3PUFA[(30.39 4±2.29)%]顯著低于攝食人工飼料組[(34.40±3.32)%](P<0.05),其中小雜魚組的EPA+DHA的總量為(29.27±2.33)%,顯著低于攝食人工飼料組的(33.47±3.36)%(P<0.05);攝食小雜魚組的∑ω6PUFA為(6.01 4±0.31)%,顯著高于攝食人工飼料組的(5.06 4±0.37)%(P<0.05).綜閤來看,兩組褐牙鲆均含有豐富的各種營養成分,攝食小雜魚組的粗蛋白、粗脂肪和氨基痠營養較好,而攝食人工飼料組的多不飽和脂肪痠營養較好,兩者各有優勢.
비교분석료분별투위소잡어화인공사료적량조갈아평기육영양성분,지재위갈아평적영양수구연구급기사료연제제공삼고.결과현시:섭식소잡어조적수분함량현저저우섭식인공사료조(P<0.05),이조단백화조지방함량현저고우섭식인공사료조(P<0.05),조회분함량재량조간차이불현저(P>0.05);량조갈아평적안기산조성기본일치,균함유18충안기산,필수안기산지수(EAAI)분별위71.15화70.47,기구성비례부합FAO/WHO적표준.섭식소잡어조갈아평중검측도11충포화지방산(SFA)、6충단불포화지방산(MUFA)화9충다불포화지방산(PUFA);섭식인공사료조중검측도11충SFA、7충MUFA화9충PUFA.섭식소잡어조적∑ω3PUFA[(30.39 4±2.29)%]현저저우섭식인공사료조[(34.40±3.32)%](P<0.05),기중소잡어조적EPA+DHA적총량위(29.27±2.33)%,현저저우섭식인공사료조적(33.47±3.36)%(P<0.05);섭식소잡어조적∑ω6PUFA위(6.01 4±0.31)%,현저고우섭식인공사료조적(5.06 4±0.37)%(P<0.05).종합래간,량조갈아평균함유봉부적각충영양성분,섭식소잡어조적조단백、조지방화안기산영양교호,이섭식인공사료조적다불포화지방산영양교호,량자각유우세.
This paper compared nutritional components in the muscles of two groups of Paralichthys olivaceus fed on artificial diet(group Ⅰ)and fresh fish(group Ⅱ)respectively.The resuhs showed that the content of moisture of group Ⅰ was significantly lower than that of group Ⅱ while the latter's content of crude protein and crude lipid were significantly higher(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the content of crude ash between the two groups(P>0.05).The component of amino acids was similar between the two groups (P>0.05).The component ofthe essential amino acids(EAA)meets the standard of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO)/Word Health Organization(WHO).Based on the nutrition evaluation of amino acids score(AAS)and chemical score(CS),the limited amino acids of these two groups were(Met+Cys).The essential amino acids index(EAAI)was also similar between the two groups(P>0.05),i.e.71.15 for the group fed on fresh fish and 70.47 for the group fed on artificial diet,respectively.There were 11 kinds of saturated fatty acids(SFA),6 kinds of mono-unsaturated fatty acids(MUFA)and 9 kinds of poly unsaturated fatty acids(PUFA)in group I,while 11 kinds of SFA,7 kinds of MUFA and 9 kinds of PUFA were found in group Ⅱ.There were significant differences between group I and group Ⅱ in ω3PUFA and ω6PUFA(P<0.05).The proportions of ω3PUFA and ω6PUFA were(30.39.4±2.29)%and 6.01±0.31%in group I and(34.40±3.32)%and(5.06±0.37)%in groupⅡ,respectively.It was observed that the proportion of EPA & DHA in group I was lower than that of group Ⅱ,that was(29.27±2.33%)in group Ⅰ and(33.47±3.36)%in group Ⅱ(P<0.05).The present study indicated that both groups contained abundant amino acids and fatty acids,but the fish fed on fresh fish had higher nutritional components in crude protein,amino acids while the fish fed Oil artificial diet had higher nutritional components in PUFA.