CAJ | 학술논문

目的通过对网络成瘾者应激相关变量:社会支持、应付方式、认知评价和个性因素进行分析,对网络成瘾的可能诱因进行探讨.方法对大连市初中网络成瘾学生129名,非网络成瘾学生129名及不上网学生129名,应用自制一般状况调查表、陈氏网络成瘾量表、艾森克人格问卷、应付方式问卷、领悟社会支持量表和自动思维问卷进行调查分析.结果 (1)人格:3组在神经质[(54.11±11.45)分,(49.53±11.28)分,(48.91±12.10)分]、精神质[(50.70±12.08)分,(46.98±11.40)分,(45.54±10.16)分]及掩饰性[(47.05±9.11)分,(51.05±8.92)分,(52.33±8.59)分]方面均差异有显著性(P<0.01).(2)自动思维:3组在自动思维总分方面差异有显著性(P<0.01).(3)应付方式:3组在自责、幻想、退避及合理化方面均差异有显著性(P<0.01),不同程度的网络成瘾者在求助方面差异有显著性(P<0.05).(4)领悟社会支持:3组在家庭内支持、家庭外支持及领悟社会支持总分方面均差异有显著性(P<0.01).结论网络成瘾青少年与非成瘾青少年的应激中间变量各个方面均有差异.
목적 통과대망락성은자응격상관변량:사회지지、응부방식、인지평개화개성인소진행분석,대망락성은적가능유인진행탐토.방법 대대련시초중망락성은학생129명,비망락성은학생129명급불상망학생129명,응용자제일반상황조사표、진씨망락성은량표、애삼극인격문권、응부방식문권、령오사회지지량표화자동사유문권진행조사분석.결과 (1)인격:3조재신경질[(54.11±11.45)분,(49.53±11.28)분,(48.91±12.10)분]、정신질[(50.70±12.08)분,(46.98±11.40)분,(45.54±10.16)분]급엄식성[(47.05±9.11)분,(51.05±8.92)분,(52.33±8.59)분]방면균차이유현저성(P<0.01).(2)자동사유:3조재자동사유총분방면차이유현저성(P<0.01).(3)응부방식:3조재자책、환상、퇴피급합이화방면균차이유현저성(P<0.01),불동정도적망락성은자재구조방면차이유현저성(P<0.05).(4)령오사회지지:3조재가정내지지、가정외지지급령오사회지지총분방면균차이유현저성(P<0.01).결론 망락성은청소년여비성은청소년적응격중간변량각개방면균유차이.
Objective Base on the stress theory, try to find out the possible inducing factors of adolescent internet addiction disorder (IAD) by study on the intermediary variable of stress, namely social support, coping style, cognitive evaluation and personality. It will provide scientific guidance for future treatment and prevention of internet addition by clarified the intermediary variables' feature of adolescent IAD. Methods During June to October 2007,129 internet addiction disorder adolescents, 129 non-internet addiction disorder adolescents, and 129 non-internet adolescents were investigated with general questionnaire, Chen Internet Addiction Scale(CIAS), Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Check-list (ASLEC), Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ), Coping style questionnaire(CSQ), Perceived social support scale (PSSS), the automatic thoughts questionnaire (ATQ). Results (1)Personality: there was significant difference on P, N and L scores within three groups ( F = 7.228～12.373, P< 0.01 ). (2)Automatic thoughts: there was significant difference on automatic thoughts scores within three groups( F = 12.208, P < 0.01 ). (3)Coping style : there was significant difference on self-blame, fantasy, retreat, and rationalization within three groups ( F=-0.620～1.643, P < 0.01 ). (4)Perceived social support (PSSS) : there was significant difference on PSSS among IAD group, non-IAD group, and non-IT group ( F=every stress intermediary variable between sexes.