天文研究与技术-国家天文台台刊
天文研究與技術-國傢天文檯檯刊
천문연구여기술-국가천문태태간
ASTRONOMICAL RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY-PUBLICATIONS OF NATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORIES OF CHINA
2007年
2期
113-120
,共8页
谢照华%陈洛恩%郝建明%杜雷鸣%张雄
謝照華%陳洛恩%郝建明%杜雷鳴%張雄
사조화%진락은%학건명%두뢰명%장웅
星系%活动星系核%基本参数%黑洞质量
星繫%活動星繫覈%基本參數%黑洞質量
성계%활동성계핵%기본삼수%흑동질량
active glactic nuclei%fundamental parameters%black hole mass
与吸积率和爱丁顿吸积率的比率一道,黑洞质量也是活动星系核的一个基本参数.我们采用谢光中等的新方法去估计了21个blazar样本的黑洞质量(MH),同时运用了MBH-σ相关分析方法来估计同一个blazar样本的黑洞质量(Mσ),通过对两种不同方法所得样本黑洞质量的比较,我们发现(1)MH系统的小于Mσ,但是对于大多数blazar样本来说Mσ和MH之间的差别很小;(2)在Mσ和MH之间存在着一个有意义的相关性,相关系数为r=0.832,p≤1.0×10-4.以上述的这些性质和活动星系核标准模型为基础,我们证明了这两种方法所得的黑洞质量Mσ和MH之间的系统差异是因为Mσ描述的是宽发射线区(r≤rb)的黑洞质量,而MH描述的是黑洞周围在最内层轨道附近的连续发射区的质量.这就是说Mσ应该是被过度估计了.由Mσ和中心黑洞质量MH*的关系,我们再次计算中心黑洞质量MH*,并且发现中心黑洞质量MH*和MH几乎是相同的.
與吸積率和愛丁頓吸積率的比率一道,黑洞質量也是活動星繫覈的一箇基本參數.我們採用謝光中等的新方法去估計瞭21箇blazar樣本的黑洞質量(MH),同時運用瞭MBH-σ相關分析方法來估計同一箇blazar樣本的黑洞質量(Mσ),通過對兩種不同方法所得樣本黑洞質量的比較,我們髮現(1)MH繫統的小于Mσ,但是對于大多數blazar樣本來說Mσ和MH之間的差彆很小;(2)在Mσ和MH之間存在著一箇有意義的相關性,相關繫數為r=0.832,p≤1.0×10-4.以上述的這些性質和活動星繫覈標準模型為基礎,我們證明瞭這兩種方法所得的黑洞質量Mσ和MH之間的繫統差異是因為Mσ描述的是寬髮射線區(r≤rb)的黑洞質量,而MH描述的是黑洞週圍在最內層軌道附近的連續髮射區的質量.這就是說Mσ應該是被過度估計瞭.由Mσ和中心黑洞質量MH*的關繫,我們再次計算中心黑洞質量MH*,併且髮現中心黑洞質量MH*和MH幾乎是相同的.
여흡적솔화애정돈흡적솔적비솔일도,흑동질량야시활동성계핵적일개기본삼수.아문채용사광중등적신방법거고계료21개blazar양본적흑동질량(MH),동시운용료MBH-σ상관분석방법래고계동일개blazar양본적흑동질량(Mσ),통과대량충불동방법소득양본흑동질량적비교,아문발현(1)MH계통적소우Mσ,단시대우대다수blazar양본래설Mσ화MH지간적차별흔소;(2)재Mσ화MH지간존재착일개유의의적상관성,상관계수위r=0.832,p≤1.0×10-4.이상술적저사성질화활동성계핵표준모형위기출,아문증명료저량충방법소득적흑동질량Mσ화MH지간적계통차이시인위Mσ묘술적시관발사선구(r≤rb)적흑동질량,이MH묘술적시흑동주위재최내층궤도부근적련속발사구적질량.저취시설Mσ응해시피과도고계료.유Mσ화중심흑동질량MH*적관계,아문재차계산중심흑동질량MH*,병차발현중심흑동질량MH*화MH궤호시상동적.
Black hole mass, along with the ratio of the accretionrate to the Eddington accretion rate, is a fundamental parameter of active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Using Xie's method of the black mass estimate, we developed our sample and estimated the black hole masses represented by MH for 21 blazars. We compare 21cases for each of which the relevant black hole mass has been also estimated by the MBH-σ correlation method , which is represented by Mσ. And we find that (1)MH are systematically lower than Mσ,but the differences between Mσ and MH are very small for most of the sources; (2) there is a significant correlation between Mσ and MH, the correlation coefficient r=0.823 with chance probability p~1.0×10-4.Based on these properties mentioned above and the standard model of AGNs, we prove that the nature of the systematical difference between Mσ and MH is that Mσ represents the mass in broad emission line region (r≤rb), while MH represents the mass in the continual emission region (r≤ra and ra<<rb) which is near the innermost stable orbit around the black hole. That is,Mσ would be overestimated. From Mσ, we calculate the central black hole mass again,which is indicated by M*H, and find that M*H is almost equal to the correspondent MH.