中华物理医学与康复杂志
中華物理醫學與康複雜誌
중화물리의학여강복잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
2010年
3期
198-204
,共7页
唐洲平%曾文高%廖完敏%刘娜%杨洁%骆翔
唐洲平%曾文高%廖完敏%劉娜%楊潔%駱翔
당주평%증문고%료완민%류나%양길%락상
强制性运动疗法%脑卒中%随机对照试验%Meta分析
彊製性運動療法%腦卒中%隨機對照試驗%Meta分析
강제성운동요법%뇌졸중%수궤대조시험%Meta분석
Constraint-induced movement therapy%Stroke%Randomized controlled trials%Meta-annlysis
目的 采用Meta分析评价强制性使用运动疗法用于成人脑卒中后偏瘫侧上肢运动功能障碍的康复疗效.方法 电子检索PubMed、EBSCO、Ovid、The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails、Embase、Science Citation Index Expanded、HighWire Press、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBMDisc)、中国知网(CNKI)、维普数据库(VIP),文献检索起止时间均为从建库到2009年9月,同时检索纳入文献的参考文献,纳入强制性使用运动疗法用于成人脑卒中后偏瘫侧上肢运动功能障碍的随机对照试验,进行质量评价及资料提取.统计学分析采用RevMan 5.0.22.0软件.结果 共纳入12个随机对照试验(共648例).Meta分析结果显示:与神经发育疗法(NDT)、作业疗法等常规康复疗法相比,(改良)强制性使用运动疗法能更好地提高动作效率,缩短标准化动作时间,WMD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.02,0.00);提升偏瘫侧上肢的使用时间与动作品质,动作活动日志(MAL)-使用患手的时间(AOU)比较,WMD=0.910,95%CI(0.54,1.29),动作活动日志(MAL)-患手的动作品质(QOM)比较,WMD=0.91,95% CI(0.56,1.27);更好地改善偏瘫侧上肢灵活性,手臂动作研究测验(ARAT).抓比较,WMD=0.83,95% CI(0.33,1.32);偏瘫侧上肢运动损害降低更为明显,Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分法(FMA)比较,WMD=5.72,95% CI(0.01,11.44);还不能认为强制性运动疗法比常规康复治疗能更好地提高偏瘫侧上肢执行日常生活活动的独立程度.结论 现有资料表明,(改良)强制性使用运动疗法在一定程度上可能较常规康复疗法更有效地促进脑卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢功能恢复,但是鉴于现有研究较少,样本量小,质量不高,病程长短差异大,随访时间、结果 测量指标不一致,因此需要开展大样本、多中心、方法 科学和规范的高质量随机对照试验进一步验证.
目的 採用Meta分析評價彊製性使用運動療法用于成人腦卒中後偏癱側上肢運動功能障礙的康複療效.方法 電子檢索PubMed、EBSCO、Ovid、The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails、Embase、Science Citation Index Expanded、HighWire Press、中國生物醫學文獻數據庫(CBMDisc)、中國知網(CNKI)、維普數據庫(VIP),文獻檢索起止時間均為從建庫到2009年9月,同時檢索納入文獻的參攷文獻,納入彊製性使用運動療法用于成人腦卒中後偏癱側上肢運動功能障礙的隨機對照試驗,進行質量評價及資料提取.統計學分析採用RevMan 5.0.22.0軟件.結果 共納入12箇隨機對照試驗(共648例).Meta分析結果顯示:與神經髮育療法(NDT)、作業療法等常規康複療法相比,(改良)彊製性使用運動療法能更好地提高動作效率,縮短標準化動作時間,WMD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.02,0.00);提升偏癱側上肢的使用時間與動作品質,動作活動日誌(MAL)-使用患手的時間(AOU)比較,WMD=0.910,95%CI(0.54,1.29),動作活動日誌(MAL)-患手的動作品質(QOM)比較,WMD=0.91,95% CI(0.56,1.27);更好地改善偏癱側上肢靈活性,手臂動作研究測驗(ARAT).抓比較,WMD=0.83,95% CI(0.33,1.32);偏癱側上肢運動損害降低更為明顯,Fugl-Meyer運動功能評分法(FMA)比較,WMD=5.72,95% CI(0.01,11.44);還不能認為彊製性運動療法比常規康複治療能更好地提高偏癱側上肢執行日常生活活動的獨立程度.結論 現有資料錶明,(改良)彊製性使用運動療法在一定程度上可能較常規康複療法更有效地促進腦卒中患者偏癱側上肢功能恢複,但是鑒于現有研究較少,樣本量小,質量不高,病程長短差異大,隨訪時間、結果 測量指標不一緻,因此需要開展大樣本、多中心、方法 科學和規範的高質量隨機對照試驗進一步驗證.
목적 채용Meta분석평개강제성사용운동요법용우성인뇌졸중후편탄측상지운동공능장애적강복료효.방법 전자검색PubMed、EBSCO、Ovid、The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails、Embase、Science Citation Index Expanded、HighWire Press、중국생물의학문헌수거고(CBMDisc)、중국지망(CNKI)、유보수거고(VIP),문헌검색기지시간균위종건고도2009년9월,동시검색납입문헌적삼고문헌,납입강제성사용운동요법용우성인뇌졸중후편탄측상지운동공능장애적수궤대조시험,진행질량평개급자료제취.통계학분석채용RevMan 5.0.22.0연건.결과 공납입12개수궤대조시험(공648례).Meta분석결과현시:여신경발육요법(NDT)、작업요법등상규강복요법상비,(개량)강제성사용운동요법능경호지제고동작효솔,축단표준화동작시간,WMD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.02,0.00);제승편탄측상지적사용시간여동작품질,동작활동일지(MAL)-사용환수적시간(AOU)비교,WMD=0.910,95%CI(0.54,1.29),동작활동일지(MAL)-환수적동작품질(QOM)비교,WMD=0.91,95% CI(0.56,1.27);경호지개선편탄측상지령활성,수비동작연구측험(ARAT).조비교,WMD=0.83,95% CI(0.33,1.32);편탄측상지운동손해강저경위명현,Fugl-Meyer운동공능평분법(FMA)비교,WMD=5.72,95% CI(0.01,11.44);환불능인위강제성운동요법비상규강복치료능경호지제고편탄측상지집행일상생활활동적독립정도.결론 현유자료표명,(개량)강제성사용운동요법재일정정도상가능교상규강복요법경유효지촉진뇌졸중환자편탄측상지공능회복,단시감우현유연구교소,양본량소,질량불고,병정장단차이대,수방시간、결과 측량지표불일치,인차수요개전대양본、다중심、방법 과학화규범적고질량수궤대조시험진일보험증.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT),modified CIMT and forced use in the treatment of the upper limbs of adults after stroke. Methods Published ac-counts of trials of these techniques were located through electronic searches of the following databases: PubMed,EBSCO, Ovid, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails, EMbase, Science Citation Index (Expanded),HighWire Press, CBMDisc, CCTR, CNKI and VIP from the date of establishment of the databases to September 2009. The bibliographies of the articles thus retrieved were also checked. Results A total of 12 trials involving 648 patients were discovered. Meta-analysis showed that CIMT has been shown to increase movement efficiency, reduce normalized movement time, increase use of the more affected arm, improve the quality of use of the more affected arm and reduce the impact of the affected arm. C1MT showed no significant effect in improving independence in daily life compared with traditional rehabilitation. Conclusions To some extent, (modified) CIMT promotes arm rehabilita-tion after stroke effectively. However, these studies were small and their quality was poor. They had different follow-up points, assessed with different rating scales, and the course of stroke in the studies was also different. So more high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed.