中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2011年
10期
1143-1145
,共3页
护理干预%肠造口者%生命质量
護理榦預%腸造口者%生命質量
호리간예%장조구자%생명질량
Nursing intervention%Colostomy patients%Life quality
目的 探讨直肠癌行Miles术后的患者,对其采取一系列护理干预措施,尽可能减少肠造口对其产生的负面影响,使其在手术后能恢复正常生活.方法 对134例因直肠癌行直肠前切除术(Miles术)患者,术后采取一系列护理干预措施,运用世界卫生组织健康相关生命质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF),与154例直肠会阴全切除术(Dixon术)的患者(保留肛门者)进行对比.结果 Dixon术的患者生命质量总分为(77.506±17.197)分,Miles术的患者生命质量总分为(76.701±15.138)分,二者在总分、生理领域、心理领域、社会关系领域、环境领域及总体健康感觉方面比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 由于肠造口的存在,Miles术后患者的生命质量较低,但是通过护理干预可以使其生命质量得到有效提高.
目的 探討直腸癌行Miles術後的患者,對其採取一繫列護理榦預措施,儘可能減少腸造口對其產生的負麵影響,使其在手術後能恢複正常生活.方法 對134例因直腸癌行直腸前切除術(Miles術)患者,術後採取一繫列護理榦預措施,運用世界衛生組織健康相關生命質量量錶(WHOQOL-BREF),與154例直腸會陰全切除術(Dixon術)的患者(保留肛門者)進行對比.結果 Dixon術的患者生命質量總分為(77.506±17.197)分,Miles術的患者生命質量總分為(76.701±15.138)分,二者在總分、生理領域、心理領域、社會關繫領域、環境領域及總體健康感覺方麵比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 由于腸造口的存在,Miles術後患者的生命質量較低,但是通過護理榦預可以使其生命質量得到有效提高.
목적 탐토직장암행Miles술후적환자,대기채취일계렬호리간예조시,진가능감소장조구대기산생적부면영향,사기재수술후능회복정상생활.방법 대134례인직장암행직장전절제술(Miles술)환자,술후채취일계렬호리간예조시,운용세계위생조직건강상관생명질량량표(WHOQOL-BREF),여154례직장회음전절제술(Dixon술)적환자(보류항문자)진행대비.결과 Dixon술적환자생명질량총분위(77.506±17.197)분,Miles술적환자생명질량총분위(76.701±15.138)분,이자재총분、생리영역、심리영역、사회관계영역、배경영역급총체건강감각방면비교차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 유우장조구적존재,Miles술후환자적생명질량교저,단시통과호리간예가이사기생명질량득도유효제고.
Objective To discuss the quality of live of the patients with Miles operation for rectal cancer,minimize the negative impact of colostomy on their life by a series of nursing interventions. Methods 134 patients with Miles operation for rectal cancer were collected and experienced a series of nursing intervention, the WHO quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) was used to evaluate the data, the difference of the patients with Miles operation and the patients with Dixon operation were compared. Results The total score of the patients with Dixon operation was (77.506 ± 17. 197), the total score of the patients with Miles operation was(76. 701 ± 15. 138).Both in total score, the field of physiology, psychology, social relationship, erwiornment and general health perception were no significant difference (P > 0. 05). Conclusions The quality of life of patients with Miles operation and with Dixon operation was overall not high. But there was no significant difference between them.Many factors can affect the quality of life of patients with colostomy, so we should strengthen the nursing intervention and get support of society and families.