中华儿科杂志
中華兒科雜誌
중화인과잡지
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
2008年
2期
98-103
,共6页
张清玲%郑劲平%潘卫华%何桦%陈桂莲%安嘉颖%袁丽芬%罗锭芬
張清玲%鄭勁平%潘衛華%何樺%陳桂蓮%安嘉穎%袁麗芬%囉錠芬
장청령%정경평%반위화%하화%진계련%안가영%원려분%라정분
最大呼气流速%肺通气%雾化器和汽化器%儿童,学龄前
最大呼氣流速%肺通氣%霧化器和汽化器%兒童,學齡前
최대호기류속%폐통기%무화기화기화기%인동,학령전
Maximal expiratory flow rate%Pulmonary ventilation%Nebulizers and vaporizers%Child,preschool
目的 研究正常学龄前儿童在各种常用模拟吸入器阻力状态下的最大吸气能力,并探讨其与年龄、身高、体重及通气功能的相关性.方法 使用In-Check DAIL吸气流量检测仪及峰流量仪,对深圳地区3~6岁正常学龄前儿童370例进行常用吸入器[Surehaler气雾剂(Surehaler)、Autohaler气雾剂(Autohaler)、都保(Turbuhaler)、准纳器(Diskus)]阻力状态下吸气流量峰值(PIF)及呼气流量峰值(PEF)测定,同时采用意大利COSMED流量传感仪,测定其通气功能.测量指标包括:无阻力状态下的PIF(PIF-N)、模拟Surehaler时的PIF(PIF-S)、模拟Autohaler时的PIF(PIF-A)、模拟Turbuhaler时的PIF(PIF-T)、模拟Diskus时的PIF(PIF-D)、PEF、用力肺活量(FVC)、0.5秒用力呼气容积(FEVO.5)、0.75秒用力呼气容积(FEV0.75)、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、最大呼气中段流量(FEF25-75)等.结果 (1)370例中有75例不能成功完成吸气或呼气功能测试,实际研究人数295例.PIF-S、PIF-A、PIF-T、PIF-D在3~岁组、4~岁组、5~岁组、6~7岁组各组之间差异有统计学意义,随着年龄增长、身高增高,各最高吸气流量亦明显增高.(2)各模拟阻力状态下PIF与年龄、身高和体重均有相关性,其中以与年龄、身高的相关性较好.(3)在正确完成测试儿童中,PIF-S、PIF-A、PIF-D达到各自吸人器所需最小流量比例均为100%,PIF-T达到Turbuhaler所需最小流量比例为87.5%,未达标学龄前儿童以3~岁组或身高在100 cm以下儿童为主.各阻力模拟状态下的PIF与通气功能主要指标均有较好的相关性,其中以PEF为最佳.结论 可通过正常学龄前儿童常规进行的肺通气功能测试预测其吸气能力的大小;对不同学龄前儿童选择吸入器时,应充分考虑到其吸气能力的大小.
目的 研究正常學齡前兒童在各種常用模擬吸入器阻力狀態下的最大吸氣能力,併探討其與年齡、身高、體重及通氣功能的相關性.方法 使用In-Check DAIL吸氣流量檢測儀及峰流量儀,對深圳地區3~6歲正常學齡前兒童370例進行常用吸入器[Surehaler氣霧劑(Surehaler)、Autohaler氣霧劑(Autohaler)、都保(Turbuhaler)、準納器(Diskus)]阻力狀態下吸氣流量峰值(PIF)及呼氣流量峰值(PEF)測定,同時採用意大利COSMED流量傳感儀,測定其通氣功能.測量指標包括:無阻力狀態下的PIF(PIF-N)、模擬Surehaler時的PIF(PIF-S)、模擬Autohaler時的PIF(PIF-A)、模擬Turbuhaler時的PIF(PIF-T)、模擬Diskus時的PIF(PIF-D)、PEF、用力肺活量(FVC)、0.5秒用力呼氣容積(FEVO.5)、0.75秒用力呼氣容積(FEV0.75)、一秒用力呼氣容積(FEV1)、最大呼氣中段流量(FEF25-75)等.結果 (1)370例中有75例不能成功完成吸氣或呼氣功能測試,實際研究人數295例.PIF-S、PIF-A、PIF-T、PIF-D在3~歲組、4~歲組、5~歲組、6~7歲組各組之間差異有統計學意義,隨著年齡增長、身高增高,各最高吸氣流量亦明顯增高.(2)各模擬阻力狀態下PIF與年齡、身高和體重均有相關性,其中以與年齡、身高的相關性較好.(3)在正確完成測試兒童中,PIF-S、PIF-A、PIF-D達到各自吸人器所需最小流量比例均為100%,PIF-T達到Turbuhaler所需最小流量比例為87.5%,未達標學齡前兒童以3~歲組或身高在100 cm以下兒童為主.各阻力模擬狀態下的PIF與通氣功能主要指標均有較好的相關性,其中以PEF為最佳.結論 可通過正常學齡前兒童常規進行的肺通氣功能測試預測其吸氣能力的大小;對不同學齡前兒童選擇吸入器時,應充分攷慮到其吸氣能力的大小.
목적 연구정상학령전인동재각충상용모의흡입기조력상태하적최대흡기능력,병탐토기여년령、신고、체중급통기공능적상관성.방법 사용In-Check DAIL흡기류량검측의급봉류량의,대심수지구3~6세정상학령전인동370례진행상용흡입기[Surehaler기무제(Surehaler)、Autohaler기무제(Autohaler)、도보(Turbuhaler)、준납기(Diskus)]조력상태하흡기류량봉치(PIF)급호기류량봉치(PEF)측정,동시채용의대리COSMED류량전감의,측정기통기공능.측량지표포괄:무조력상태하적PIF(PIF-N)、모의Surehaler시적PIF(PIF-S)、모의Autohaler시적PIF(PIF-A)、모의Turbuhaler시적PIF(PIF-T)、모의Diskus시적PIF(PIF-D)、PEF、용력폐활량(FVC)、0.5초용력호기용적(FEVO.5)、0.75초용력호기용적(FEV0.75)、일초용력호기용적(FEV1)、최대호기중단류량(FEF25-75)등.결과 (1)370례중유75례불능성공완성흡기혹호기공능측시,실제연구인수295례.PIF-S、PIF-A、PIF-T、PIF-D재3~세조、4~세조、5~세조、6~7세조각조지간차이유통계학의의,수착년령증장、신고증고,각최고흡기류량역명현증고.(2)각모의조력상태하PIF여년령、신고화체중균유상관성,기중이여년령、신고적상관성교호.(3)재정학완성측시인동중,PIF-S、PIF-A、PIF-D체도각자흡인기소수최소류량비례균위100%,PIF-T체도Turbuhaler소수최소류량비례위87.5%,미체표학령전인동이3~세조혹신고재100 cm이하인동위주.각조력모의상태하적PIF여통기공능주요지표균유교호적상관성,기중이PEF위최가.결론 가통과정상학령전인동상규진행적폐통기공능측시예측기흡기능력적대소;대불동학령전인동선택흡입기시,응충분고필도기흡기능력적대소.
Objective Dry powder inhalers(DPIs)are increasingly being used to deliver drugs for the treatment of asthma.It is known that DPIs require a crueial minimal inspiratory flow.Previous studies have demonstrated that the peak inspiratory flow(PIF,L/min)through a DPI is dependent on the type of device,the age of the patient,and the level of bronchial obstruction.However,the peak inspiratory flow of healtlly preschool children in China remains scant in the literature.The present study aimed to analyze the ability of inspifing flow through the resistance state of ordinary use inhaler in Shenzhen healthy preschool children by measuring the peak inspiratory flow through the different analogue dry powder inhalers and go further into the relationship between it and the age,weight and forced expiratory volume of the children.Method A survey in 370 healthy preschool children aged 3 to 6 years(75 children aged 3 years,104 children aged 4 years,100 children aged 5 years and 91 children aged 6 years)was carried out in Shenzhen.Peak inspiratory flow(PIF)was measured without and with resistances,which mimicked the internal resistances of several inhalers,Diskus,Turbuhaler,Autohaler,Surehaler by PIF meter(In-check DIAL)and then data PIF-N,PIF-D,PIF-T,PIF-A and PIF-S were obtained.Peak expiratory flow(PEF) was measured by PEF meter(MicroPeak,USA).These two measurements were made in a well-controlled setting,and at least three attempts were recorded to establish maximum achievement.Six spirometry parameters forced vital capacity(FVC),forced expiratory volume at 0.5 second(FEV 0.5),forced expiratory volume at 0.75 second(FEV 0.75),forced expiratory volume at one second(FEV1),maximal mid expiratory flow rate(FEF 25-75,PEF were measured by using COSMED spirometry of Italy and the FVC measurements should be around the quality control for spirometry in preschool children which we suggested and published in 2005.All data were expressed as mean±SD and analyzed with the statistical software SPSS 12.0 for Windows.Pearson's test was used for calculation of the significances of the correlation coefficients.Variance analysis was used for analysing the variability of inspiratory flows through
the inhalers.Results Results were obtained from 295 children aged 3-6 years who successfully finished the tests.The PIF-N,PIF-D,PIF-T,PIF-A and PIF-S were significantly different among the groups aged 3 yrs,4 yrs,5 yrs and 6 yrs.The peak inspiratory flow significantly increased with age.The PIF-N,PIF-D,PIF-T,PIF-A and PIF-S in the children of 110 cm height and above were significantly higher than those in the children below 110 cm height,so were the parameters between the children of 120 cm height and above and the children below 120 cm.PIF correlated significantly with age,height and weight and the Pearson coefficient was 0.3-0.5.The PIFs in different inhalers varied because of the different inner resistances.The minimum and optimum PIFs in resistances of Diskus,Autohaler and Surehaler could be achieved in almost all subjects,but those in resistances of Turbuhaler could be achieved in only 87.5% subiects,most of whom aged 3 yrs or below 100 cm height.There were good correlations between the PIFs in difierent resistances and main parameters of ventilation function(FVC,FEV 0.5,FEV 0.75,FEV1,FEF 25-75,PEF),PEF was the best among them(Pearson correlative coeffieient was 0.6).Conclusion The inspiratory ability of the children. As to the pre-school children of varying ages, the variety of inspiratory ability shou8ld be considered completely in the selection of inhaler used during the treatment. The best inhaler suitable for them should be selected properly in order to obtain the best efficacy of treatment individually.