中华超声影像学杂志
中華超聲影像學雜誌
중화초성영상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY
2011年
2期
152-154
,共3页
许尔蛟%郑荣琴%李凯%郭欢仪%袁树芳%毛仁%任杰%苏中振
許爾蛟%鄭榮琴%李凱%郭歡儀%袁樹芳%毛仁%任傑%囌中振
허이교%정영금%리개%곽환의%원수방%모인%임걸%소중진
超声检查%微气泡%引流术
超聲檢查%微氣泡%引流術
초성검사%미기포%인류술
Ultrasonography%Microbubbles%Drainage
目的 探讨腔内超声造影技术对常规超声下显示不清的引流管进行定位的价值.方法 26例患者共计32条留置的引流管引流不畅,常规超声无法清晰显示全程,经引流管注入稀释后的超声造影剂SonoVue对引流管进行观察,评价超声造影技术对引流管管体和引流管末端的显示能力,所需的检出时间,并判断有无脱管.结果 常规超声检查对引流管管体和引流管末端的显示率分别为52.25%(18/32)和0,超声造影的显示率分别为100%和93.75%(30/32),两种方法 的显示能力差异有统计学意义(P<0.001).超声造影检查诊断其中3条引流管已脱管.超声造影检查所需时间的中位数为4.5 s(1~77 s).结论 腔内超声造影技术是一种敏感、高效的引流管显示技术,弥补了常规超声检查的不足,可准确提供引流管信息,以协助临床医生对引流管的处理.
目的 探討腔內超聲造影技術對常規超聲下顯示不清的引流管進行定位的價值.方法 26例患者共計32條留置的引流管引流不暢,常規超聲無法清晰顯示全程,經引流管註入稀釋後的超聲造影劑SonoVue對引流管進行觀察,評價超聲造影技術對引流管管體和引流管末耑的顯示能力,所需的檢齣時間,併判斷有無脫管.結果 常規超聲檢查對引流管管體和引流管末耑的顯示率分彆為52.25%(18/32)和0,超聲造影的顯示率分彆為100%和93.75%(30/32),兩種方法 的顯示能力差異有統計學意義(P<0.001).超聲造影檢查診斷其中3條引流管已脫管.超聲造影檢查所需時間的中位數為4.5 s(1~77 s).結論 腔內超聲造影技術是一種敏感、高效的引流管顯示技術,瀰補瞭常規超聲檢查的不足,可準確提供引流管信息,以協助臨床醫生對引流管的處理.
목적 탐토강내초성조영기술대상규초성하현시불청적인류관진행정위적개치.방법 26례환자공계32조류치적인류관인류불창,상규초성무법청석현시전정,경인류관주입희석후적초성조영제SonoVue대인류관진행관찰,평개초성조영기술대인류관관체화인류관말단적현시능력,소수적검출시간,병판단유무탈관.결과 상규초성검사대인류관관체화인류관말단적현시솔분별위52.25%(18/32)화0,초성조영적현시솔분별위100%화93.75%(30/32),량충방법 적현시능력차이유통계학의의(P<0.001).초성조영검사진단기중3조인류관이탈관.초성조영검사소수시간적중위수위4.5 s(1~77 s).결론 강내초성조영기술시일충민감、고효적인류관현시기술,미보료상규초성검사적불족,가준학제공인류관신식,이협조림상의생대인류관적처리.
Objective To investigate the value of intra-cavitary contrast enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in the location of drainage tubes which were unclear in conventional ultrasonography. Methods The locations of 32 drainage tubes in 26 patients were unclear in conventional ultrasonography. The diluted ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue) was injected through the tubes. CEUS was used to evaluate the visualizations of the inner tubular portions and the distal ends. Whether the drainage tubes were in situ or not was also judged. The time-consumption of detection was counted. Results The percentages of the visualization of inner tubular portions and the distal ends in conventional ultrasonography were 52.25%(18/32) and 0,respectively. However,the percentages of visualization in CEUS were 100% and 93.75%(30/32), respectively. The difference were significant when compared conventional ultrasonography with CEUS ( P<0.001 ). CEUS detected that three drainage tubes weren't in situ. And the median of timeconsumption of CEUS was just 4. 5 seconds (range: 1-77 seconds). Conclusions Intra-cavitary CEUS is a sensitive and high efficient technique in the visualization of drainage tube which may complement the insufficiency of conventional ultrasonography. It could be used as the first choice in the location of drainage tube.