中华精神科杂志
中華精神科雜誌
중화정신과잡지
CHINESE JOURNA OF PSYCHIATRY
2010年
4期
225-229
,共5页
入睡和睡眠障碍%情绪%认知
入睡和睡眠障礙%情緒%認知
입수화수면장애%정서%인지
Insomnia%Emotions%Cognition
目的 了解受过高等教育职员的睡眠质量及其所采用的情绪调节认知策略.方法 采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)问卷、失眠严重指数(ISI)问卷、简式简明心境问卷(POMS-SF)和认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ),对采取整群随机抽样法抽取的北京市6所单位的350名大专以上在职人员的睡眠质量与情绪调节策略进行调查.结果 (1)98例(28%)存在睡眠质量问题(PSQI≥7分),146例(41.7%)日常状态受失眠影响(ISI＞7分);(2)遭遇负性生活事件后,在所有受访人员中使用频率最高的3种情绪调节策略依次为积极重新评价、重新关注计划、积极重新关注;(3)在情绪调节认知策略的灾难化维度上,主观不失眠组(ISI≤7分)得分(34.21±12.85)分,低于轻度失眠组(7分＜ISI≤14分)[(39.62±15.02)分]与中重度失眠组(ISI≥15分)[(41.48±11.25)分],差异有统计学意义(t=3.466,P=0.001;t=2.625,P=0.009);在沉浸维度上,主观不失眠组得分(46.43±12.78)分,低于轻度失眠组[(49.92±13.55)分]与中重度失眠组[(51.67±11.44)分],差异有统计学意义(t=2.332,P=0.020;t=1.974,P=0.049).结论 受访职员睡眠质量问题及主观失眠现象较多见,多能运用积极认知策略调节情绪;主观失眠组职员有更多灾难化、沉浸的消极认知策略的运用.
目的 瞭解受過高等教育職員的睡眠質量及其所採用的情緒調節認知策略.方法 採用匹玆堡睡眠質量指數(PSQI)問捲、失眠嚴重指數(ISI)問捲、簡式簡明心境問捲(POMS-SF)和認知情緒調節問捲(CERQ),對採取整群隨機抽樣法抽取的北京市6所單位的350名大專以上在職人員的睡眠質量與情緒調節策略進行調查.結果 (1)98例(28%)存在睡眠質量問題(PSQI≥7分),146例(41.7%)日常狀態受失眠影響(ISI＞7分);(2)遭遇負性生活事件後,在所有受訪人員中使用頻率最高的3種情緒調節策略依次為積極重新評價、重新關註計劃、積極重新關註;(3)在情緒調節認知策略的災難化維度上,主觀不失眠組(ISI≤7分)得分(34.21±12.85)分,低于輕度失眠組(7分＜ISI≤14分)[(39.62±15.02)分]與中重度失眠組(ISI≥15分)[(41.48±11.25)分],差異有統計學意義(t=3.466,P=0.001;t=2.625,P=0.009);在沉浸維度上,主觀不失眠組得分(46.43±12.78)分,低于輕度失眠組[(49.92±13.55)分]與中重度失眠組[(51.67±11.44)分],差異有統計學意義(t=2.332,P=0.020;t=1.974,P=0.049).結論 受訪職員睡眠質量問題及主觀失眠現象較多見,多能運用積極認知策略調節情緒;主觀失眠組職員有更多災難化、沉浸的消極認知策略的運用.
목적 료해수과고등교육직원적수면질량급기소채용적정서조절인지책략.방법 채용필자보수면질량지수(PSQI)문권、실면엄중지수(ISI)문권、간식간명심경문권(POMS-SF)화인지정서조절문권(CERQ),대채취정군수궤추양법추취적북경시6소단위적350명대전이상재직인원적수면질량여정서조절책략진행조사.결과 (1)98례(28%)존재수면질량문제(PSQI≥7분),146례(41.7%)일상상태수실면영향(ISI＞7분);(2)조우부성생활사건후,재소유수방인원중사용빈솔최고적3충정서조절책략의차위적겁중신평개、중신관주계화、적겁중신관주;(3)재정서조절인지책략적재난화유도상,주관불실면조(ISI≤7분)득분(34.21±12.85)분,저우경도실면조(7분＜ISI≤14분)[(39.62±15.02)분]여중중도실면조(ISI≥15분)[(41.48±11.25)분],차이유통계학의의(t=3.466,P=0.001;t=2.625,P=0.009);재침침유도상,주관불실면조득분(46.43±12.78)분,저우경도실면조[(49.92±13.55)분]여중중도실면조[(51.67±11.44)분],차이유통계학의의(t=2.332,P=0.020;t=1.974,P=0.049).결론 수방직원수면질량문제급주관실면현상교다견,다능운용적겁인지책략조절정서;주관실면조직원유경다재난화、침침적소겁인지책략적운용.
Objective To investigate the sleep quality and the cognitive emotion regulation strategies of highly educated professionals. Methods Totally 350 adults from different units in Beijing completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ( PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index ( ISI), Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Results ( 1 ) Among these adults, 98 ( 28% ) had sleep problems ( PSQI ≥ 7 ), 146 ( 41.7% ) were influenced by insomnia. (2) After encountering negative events in daily life, the strategies frequently used by these 350 adults included positive reappraisal, refocusing on planning and positive refocusing. (3) There are significant difference between those three groups in different ISI degree on the dimensions of catastrophizing and rumination. Specifically, sleep good group (ISI ≤ 7 ) is significant lower than mild insomnia group (7 ＜ ISI≤14)and severe insomnia group( ISI ≥ 15 ) at the mean score of catastrophizing ( t = 3.466, P =0.001; t = 2.625, P = 0.009 ) and mean score of rumination ( t = 2.332, P = 0.020; t = 1.974, P = 0.049 ).Conclusions The results suggest there be much sleep quality problem and subjective insomnia in these staff members. In face of negative life events, these staff usually use positive strategies to regulate their emotion, and those people affected by insomnia frequently use the strategies of rumination and catastrophizing more than those who are not suffered insomnia.
