中国医学影像技术
中國醫學影像技術
중국의학영상기술
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
2010年
3期
448-451
,共4页
徐丽艳%钱银锋%赵本胜%余永强%刘斌
徐麗豔%錢銀鋒%趙本勝%餘永彊%劉斌
서려염%전은봉%조본성%여영강%류빈
神经外胚层肿瘤,原始,外周%磁共振成像%免疫组织化学
神經外胚層腫瘤,原始,外週%磁共振成像%免疫組織化學
신경외배층종류,원시,외주%자공진성상%면역조직화학
Neuroectodermal tumors,primitive,peripheral%Magnetic resonance imaging%Immunohistochemistry
目的 分析外周原始神经外胚层肿瘤(pPNET)的MRI表现,并与病理结果相对照.方法 收集经病理及免疫组化检查确诊的7例pPNET患者资料,回顾性分析其临床表现、病理特征及MRI表现.结果 7例pPNET中,2例位于颅内,2例位于下肢,1例位于椎管内并跨椎管内外生长,1例位于盆腔内并累及骶骨,1例位于腹膜后.软组织内pPNET呈等T1、稍高T2信号,内可见囊变坏死及出血,1例边缘可见假包膜,增强后肿瘤实性部分明显强化,侵犯周围骨组织.骨pPNET表现为溶骨性骨质破坏,伴有较大的软组织肿块.免疫组化结果显示7例均见CD99表达,4例突触素表达,3例嗜铬粒蛋白表达,2例神经元特异性烯醇酶表达,2例波形蛋白表达,1例上皮细胞膜抗原表达.结论 MRI对外周原始神经外胚层肿瘤的诊断有重要参考价值,确诊仍依赖于病理和免疫组织化学检查.
目的 分析外週原始神經外胚層腫瘤(pPNET)的MRI錶現,併與病理結果相對照.方法 收集經病理及免疫組化檢查確診的7例pPNET患者資料,迴顧性分析其臨床錶現、病理特徵及MRI錶現.結果 7例pPNET中,2例位于顱內,2例位于下肢,1例位于椎管內併跨椎管內外生長,1例位于盆腔內併纍及骶骨,1例位于腹膜後.軟組織內pPNET呈等T1、稍高T2信號,內可見囊變壞死及齣血,1例邊緣可見假包膜,增彊後腫瘤實性部分明顯彊化,侵犯週圍骨組織.骨pPNET錶現為溶骨性骨質破壞,伴有較大的軟組織腫塊.免疫組化結果顯示7例均見CD99錶達,4例突觸素錶達,3例嗜鉻粒蛋白錶達,2例神經元特異性烯醇酶錶達,2例波形蛋白錶達,1例上皮細胞膜抗原錶達.結論 MRI對外週原始神經外胚層腫瘤的診斷有重要參攷價值,確診仍依賴于病理和免疫組織化學檢查.
목적 분석외주원시신경외배층종류(pPNET)적MRI표현,병여병리결과상대조.방법 수집경병리급면역조화검사학진적7례pPNET환자자료,회고성분석기림상표현、병리특정급MRI표현.결과 7례pPNET중,2례위우로내,2례위우하지,1례위우추관내병과추관내외생장,1례위우분강내병루급저골,1례위우복막후.연조직내pPNET정등T1、초고T2신호,내가견낭변배사급출혈,1례변연가견가포막,증강후종류실성부분명현강화,침범주위골조직.골pPNET표현위용골성골질파배,반유교대적연조직종괴.면역조화결과현시7례균견CD99표체,4례돌촉소표체,3례기락립단백표체,2례신경원특이성희순매표체,2례파형단백표체,1례상피세포막항원표체.결론 MRI대외주원시신경외배층종류적진단유중요삼고개치,학진잉의뢰우병리화면역조직화학검사.
Objective To analyze MRI features of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (pPNET) in comparison with pathological findings. Methods The clinical manifestation, pathological features and the MRI appearances of 7 patients with pathologically proved pPNET were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among 7 patients, 2 patients located in intracalvarium, 2 in lower extremities, 1 in vertebral canal and extended outside of vertebral canal, 1 in cavitas pelvis and involved sacrum, and the rest 1 in the retroperitoneal space. The lesions in soft tissue manifested as iso-intensity on T1WI, slight hyper-intensity on T2WI with cystic degeneration and hemorrhage. Pseudo-capsule was seen in 1 patient. The solid parts of pPNET enhanced markedly after the contrast agent was injected. The adjacent bones were usually involved. pPNET in bone presented as osteolytic destruction of bone with large soft tissue mass. Immunohistochemical examination showed CD99 expression in all 7 patients, synaptophysin (Syn) expression in 4, Chromogranin (CgA) expression in 3, neuron specific enolase (NSE) expression in 2, vimentin (Vim) expression in 2 and EMA in 1 patient. Conclusion MRI has important reference value in diagnosis of pPNET, but final diagnosis still depends on the pathological and immunohistochemical examination.