临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
臨床耳鼻嚥喉頭頸外科雜誌
림상이비인후두경외과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
2010年
2期
62-65
,共4页
周宣岩%陶谦%张峰%王玉芝%高振峰%吕凌燕
週宣巖%陶謙%張峰%王玉芝%高振峰%呂凌燕
주선암%도겸%장봉%왕옥지%고진봉%려릉연
鼻窦炎%鼻息肉%复发%生活质量%SF-36%SNOT-20
鼻竇炎%鼻息肉%複髮%生活質量%SF-36%SNOT-20
비두염%비식육%복발%생활질량%SF-36%SNOT-20
sinusitis%nasal polypsis%recurrence%quality of life%SF-36%SNOT-20
目的:探讨修正性鼻内镜手术(RESS)对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻息肉患者(CRSwNP)健康相关生活质量(QOL)的影响.方法:采用国内现有的中文版SF-36量表(MOS SF-36)和汉化英文版SNOT-20量表(SNOT-20),分别对60例施行修正性鼻内镜手术组(RESS)的CRSwNP患者和120名健康体检者进行QOL的调查与评估,并将2组的结果进行对比.结果:通过SF-36量表评估显示:RESS组术前CRSwNP患者SF-36的维度计分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05 ).通过汉化SNOT-20评估显示: RESS组术前CRSwNP患者SNOT-20各条目计分和条目总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).RESS组CRSwNP患者术后6个月SF-36和SNOT-20量表评估得分与对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05 ).结论:RESS可明显改善CRSwNP患者的QOL;SF-36和汉化SNOT-20量表能有效调查评估CRSwNP患者的QOL.
目的:探討脩正性鼻內鏡手術(RESS)對慢性鼻-鼻竇炎鼻息肉患者(CRSwNP)健康相關生活質量(QOL)的影響.方法:採用國內現有的中文版SF-36量錶(MOS SF-36)和漢化英文版SNOT-20量錶(SNOT-20),分彆對60例施行脩正性鼻內鏡手術組(RESS)的CRSwNP患者和120名健康體檢者進行QOL的調查與評估,併將2組的結果進行對比.結果:通過SF-36量錶評估顯示:RESS組術前CRSwNP患者SF-36的維度計分均低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05 ).通過漢化SNOT-20評估顯示: RESS組術前CRSwNP患者SNOT-20各條目計分和條目總分均高于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).RESS組CRSwNP患者術後6箇月SF-36和SNOT-20量錶評估得分與對照組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05 ).結論:RESS可明顯改善CRSwNP患者的QOL;SF-36和漢化SNOT-20量錶能有效調查評估CRSwNP患者的QOL.
목적:탐토수정성비내경수술(RESS)대만성비-비두염비식육환자(CRSwNP)건강상관생활질량(QOL)적영향.방법:채용국내현유적중문판SF-36량표(MOS SF-36)화한화영문판SNOT-20량표(SNOT-20),분별대60례시행수정성비내경수술조(RESS)적CRSwNP환자화120명건강체검자진행QOL적조사여평고,병장2조적결과진행대비.결과:통과SF-36량표평고현시:RESS조술전CRSwNP환자SF-36적유도계분균저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05 ).통과한화SNOT-20평고현시: RESS조술전CRSwNP환자SNOT-20각조목계분화조목총분균고우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).RESS조CRSwNP환자술후6개월SF-36화SNOT-20량표평고득분여대조조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05 ).결론:RESS가명현개선CRSwNP환자적QOL;SF-36화한화SNOT-20량표능유효조사평고CRSwNP환자적QOL.
Objective:To explore the effect of revision endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS) on quality of life in the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polypsis (CRSwNP).Method:To survey and evaluate 60 cases of RESS patiens (treatment group) and 120 normal ones with physical examination (Control group) through the medical outcomes survey short form questions (MOS SF-36) and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), and comparison and analysis of the two groups results which we got were carried out.Result:With SF-36 scales for evaluation of quality of life, the results show that: the scores of CRSwNP patients (treatment group) without surgical treatments with RESS were significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05); while use of SNOT-20 scales in evaluation of the properative treatment group patients, the results were significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05). While the CRSwNP patients with surgical treatments with RESS for 6 monthes, not only with SF-36 scales but also with SNOT-20 scales,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05 ).Conclusion:RESS may obviously improve the clinical symptom of CRSNP patients. The SF-36 and SNOT-20 assessment scales could reflect the patient's QoL change.