中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2009年
4期
298-301
,共4页
顾爱琴%韩宝惠%张雪艳%沈洁%戚大江%熊丽纹%忻宇%宋懿懿
顧愛琴%韓寶惠%張雪豔%瀋潔%慼大江%熊麗紋%忻宇%宋懿懿
고애금%한보혜%장설염%침길%척대강%웅려문%흔우%송의의
癌,非小细胞肺%沙利度胺%药物疗法,联合
癌,非小細胞肺%沙利度胺%藥物療法,聯閤
암,비소세포폐%사리도알%약물요법,연합
Carcinoma,non-small cell lung cancer%Thalidomide%Drug therapy,combination
目的 评价血管生成抑制剂沙利度胺联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效及不良反应.方法 66例NSCLC随机分为治疗组和对照组.治疗组采用NP方案+沙利度胺治疗,长春瑞滨25~30 mg/m2,静滴,第1、8天;顺铂70~80 nc,/m2,静滴,第1天;沙利度胺200 mg/d,口服,第1天起连续给药.对照组采用NP方案化疗,剂量、方法与治疗组相同.结果 治疗组和对照组的有效率分别为51.5%和36.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗组和对照组的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为6.0个月和3.6个月,治疗组的中位TTP显著延长(P=0.0005).治疗组和对照组间毒副反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗组患者治疗后生活质量评分较对照组有提高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 沙利度胺与NP方案具有协同作用,联合应用能显著提高晚期NSCLC患者的中位TTP,且不增加治疗后不良反应的发生率.
目的 評價血管生成抑製劑沙利度胺聯閤化療治療晚期非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)的臨床療效及不良反應.方法 66例NSCLC隨機分為治療組和對照組.治療組採用NP方案+沙利度胺治療,長春瑞濱25~30 mg/m2,靜滴,第1、8天;順鉑70~80 nc,/m2,靜滴,第1天;沙利度胺200 mg/d,口服,第1天起連續給藥.對照組採用NP方案化療,劑量、方法與治療組相同.結果 治療組和對照組的有效率分彆為51.5%和36.4%,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).治療組和對照組的中位疾病進展時間(TTP)分彆為6.0箇月和3.6箇月,治療組的中位TTP顯著延長(P=0.0005).治療組和對照組間毒副反應髮生率比較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);治療組患者治療後生活質量評分較對照組有提高,但差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 沙利度胺與NP方案具有協同作用,聯閤應用能顯著提高晚期NSCLC患者的中位TTP,且不增加治療後不良反應的髮生率.
목적 평개혈관생성억제제사리도알연합화료치료만기비소세포폐암(NSCLC)적림상료효급불량반응.방법 66례NSCLC수궤분위치료조화대조조.치료조채용NP방안+사리도알치료,장춘서빈25~30 mg/m2,정적,제1、8천;순박70~80 nc,/m2,정적,제1천;사리도알200 mg/d,구복,제1천기련속급약.대조조채용NP방안화료,제량、방법여치료조상동.결과 치료조화대조조적유효솔분별위51.5%화36.4%,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).치료조화대조조적중위질병진전시간(TTP)분별위6.0개월화3.6개월,치료조적중위TTP현저연장(P=0.0005).치료조화대조조간독부반응발생솔비교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);치료조환자치료후생활질량평분교대조조유제고,단차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 사리도알여NP방안구유협동작용,연합응용능현저제고만기NSCLC환자적중위TTP,차불증가치료후불량반응적발생솔.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy, median time to progression (TIP), quality of life and toxicity in the patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), treated with thalidomide plus vinorelbine and cisplatin (NP) or NP alone. Methods Sixty six patients with advanced NSCLC were divided randomly into two groups, the trial and control groups. The trial group was treated with vinorelbine 25~30 mg/m2 I.v. On D1 and D8, cisplatin 70~80 mg/m2 I.v. On D1 (NP regimen), and thalidomise 200 nag orally and daily from D1. The control group received vinorelbine and eisplatin as above described. Results Of 66 assessable patients, the overall response rate was 51.5% in the trial group and 36.4% in the control group (P=0.22). The median TIP was 6.0 months for the trial group, and 3.6 months for the control group (P<0.001). The score of quality of life in trial group was higher than that in the control group, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in toxicities between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion NP regimen combined with thalidomide can significantly prolong the median time to tumor progression in patients with advanced NSCLC. Thalidomide may have a synergie activity with NP regimen without increased toxicities.