CAJ | 학술논문

美、德等国家立法均规定卧底警察不能实施犯罪行为，但司法实务则持较宽容的态度。事实上承认了卧底警察实施“犯罪”的合法性，并通过公共利益豁免、检察官建议策略及利益衡量等方式规避立法。法国、荷兰及台湾等国家和地区则有限度的承认了卧底警察的“犯罪行为”，并明确了授权主体及授权范围。我国卧底侦查立法宜以成文法方式有限度的承认卧底警察“作为犯罪”的合法性，并对“犯罪”的授权主体与“犯罪”的授权模式做出规定。
미、덕등국가입법균규정와저경찰불능실시범죄행위，단사법실무칙지교관용적태도。사실상승인료와저경찰실시“범죄”적합법성，병통과공공이익활면、검찰관건의책략급이익형량등방식규피입법。법국、하란급태만등국가화지구칙유한도적승인료와저경찰적“범죄행위”，병명학료수권주체급수권범위。아국와저정사입법의이성문법방식유한도적승인와저경찰“작위범죄”적합법성，병대“범죄”적수권주체여“범죄”적수권모식주출규정。
United States, Germany, and other national legislation provide that undercover police can＇t carry out crime, but judicial practice hohts the more tolerant attitude towards ＂crime＂ of undercover police. They avoid legislation by public interest immunity, the prosecutor strategic proposals and measure of interest, etc. France, the Netherlands and Taiwan and other countries and regions allow limited ＂crime＂ of undercover police. They also make clearly the authorization and range. Chinese legislation of undercover investigation should allow limited ＂crime＂ of undercover police and make regulations about the authorized body of ＂crime＂ and the licensing model.