临床儿科杂志
臨床兒科雜誌
림상인과잡지
2010年
11期
1001-1008
,共8页
张劲松%王岩%颜崇淮%蔡汝刚%任芳
張勁鬆%王巖%顏崇淮%蔡汝剛%任芳
장경송%왕암%안숭회%채여강%임방
自我调控%冲动性%事件相关电位%Go/NoGo%P3
自我調控%遲動性%事件相關電位%Go/NoGo%P3
자아조공%충동성%사건상관전위%Go/NoGo%P3
serf-regulation%impulsivity%event related potentials%Go/NoGo%P3
目的 基于行动和抑制过程研究注意缺陷多动性障碍儿童的冲动调控缺陷,进行Go/NoGo任务的事件相关电位(ERPs)P3成分的分析.方法 选择15名冲动性高的ADHD 儿童和15名正常对照组儿童,在ERPs实验中采用Go/NoGo刺激反应模式.Go和NoGo刺激出现的机率相等(各50%).结果 ①与正常儿童相比,高冲动儿童在作出的正确反应中,Go反应时较慢,而在作出的错误反应中,NoGo反应时较快,反应的正确率低.②P3波幅在病例组和对照组中都有Go-P3>NoGo-P3的倾向,尤其在ADHD的CPz和Pz点上差异有统计学意义,表现出顶中央区到顶区最大的趋势,而在额区最小.ADHD儿童的NoGo-P3波幅较小,尤其在FCz和Cz点显著,在左半球有比对照组小的倾向.③ADHD 儿童的NoGo-P3比正常儿童小,在FCz更显著.④脑地形图显示冲动的ADHD儿童右额叶的激活比正常儿童弱.结论 ADHD儿童行动的效率低,对行为的调控能力受限.Go/NoGo-P3反映行动和注意加工,左顶叶到中央区参与行动和注意加工过程.ADHD儿童顶叶皮层和右额叶功能减弱.
目的 基于行動和抑製過程研究註意缺陷多動性障礙兒童的遲動調控缺陷,進行Go/NoGo任務的事件相關電位(ERPs)P3成分的分析.方法 選擇15名遲動性高的ADHD 兒童和15名正常對照組兒童,在ERPs實驗中採用Go/NoGo刺激反應模式.Go和NoGo刺激齣現的機率相等(各50%).結果 ①與正常兒童相比,高遲動兒童在作齣的正確反應中,Go反應時較慢,而在作齣的錯誤反應中,NoGo反應時較快,反應的正確率低.②P3波幅在病例組和對照組中都有Go-P3>NoGo-P3的傾嚮,尤其在ADHD的CPz和Pz點上差異有統計學意義,錶現齣頂中央區到頂區最大的趨勢,而在額區最小.ADHD兒童的NoGo-P3波幅較小,尤其在FCz和Cz點顯著,在左半毬有比對照組小的傾嚮.③ADHD 兒童的NoGo-P3比正常兒童小,在FCz更顯著.④腦地形圖顯示遲動的ADHD兒童右額葉的激活比正常兒童弱.結論 ADHD兒童行動的效率低,對行為的調控能力受限.Go/NoGo-P3反映行動和註意加工,左頂葉到中央區參與行動和註意加工過程.ADHD兒童頂葉皮層和右額葉功能減弱.
목적 기우행동화억제과정연구주의결함다동성장애인동적충동조공결함,진행Go/NoGo임무적사건상관전위(ERPs)P3성분적분석.방법 선택15명충동성고적ADHD 인동화15명정상대조조인동,재ERPs실험중채용Go/NoGo자격반응모식.Go화NoGo자격출현적궤솔상등(각50%).결과 ①여정상인동상비,고충동인동재작출적정학반응중,Go반응시교만,이재작출적착오반응중,NoGo반응시교쾌,반응적정학솔저.②P3파폭재병례조화대조조중도유Go-P3>NoGo-P3적경향,우기재ADHD적CPz화Pz점상차이유통계학의의,표현출정중앙구도정구최대적추세,이재액구최소.ADHD인동적NoGo-P3파폭교소,우기재FCz화Cz점현저,재좌반구유비대조조소적경향.③ADHD 인동적NoGo-P3비정상인동소,재FCz경현저.④뇌지형도현시충동적ADHD인동우액협적격활비정상인동약.결론 ADHD인동행동적효솔저,대행위적조공능력수한.Go/NoGo-P3반영행동화주의가공,좌정협도중앙구삼여행동화주의가공과정.ADHD인동정협피층화우액협공능감약.
Objective To study the deficiency of serf-regulation in impulsivity children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder(ADHD)based on both procedures of action and inhibitory control.The event related potentials(ERPs)component P3 in Go/NoGo tasks was analyzed.Methods There were 15 impulsive children with ADHD and15 normal children in control group.Their age was from seven years old to eleven years old.The Go/NoGo stimulate-response model was adopted in the ERPs test.The occurrence of Go and NoGo trials was equal probability(each of 50%).Results(1)The high impulsive children had slower Go-RTs(reaction times)in making correct response than normal children,tended to be faster of NoGo-RTs in making error response and had lower correct rate.(2)P3amplitudes in both control and ADHD children had the tendency of Go-P3 > NoGo-P3,especially significant at CPz and Pz in ADHD children,showed the trend of parietal central to parietal maximum and the frontal minimum,The NoGo-P3 amplitude of ADHD group was smaller especially significant at FCz and Cz,and tended to be smaller than control on left hemisphere.(3)NoGo-P3 is smaller in impulsive children with ADHD than normal children,most significant at FCz.(4)Brain maps showed that impulsive children with ADHD were lower activation significantly in the right frontal area.Conclusions The efficiency of ADHD in action is lower.The behavior regulation in impulsive children is limited.Go/NoGo-P3 reflects action processing and attention.The left parietal lobe to central area is engaged much more in action procedure and attention.This research shows the evidence of weakened parietal cortex and right frontal cortex in impulsive children with ADHD.