解放军医学杂志
解放軍醫學雜誌
해방군의학잡지
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE PEOPLE'S LIBERATION ARMY
2001年
2期
149-151
,共3页
王伟%李辉%孙玉鹗%周乃康%刘小兵%李峻亨
王偉%李輝%孫玉鶚%週迺康%劉小兵%李峻亨
왕위%리휘%손옥악%주내강%류소병%리준형
肺癌%激光诱发荧光%光谱
肺癌%激光誘髮熒光%光譜
폐암%격광유발형광%광보
为确立激光诱发自体荧光(LIAF)光谱,区分肺癌组织和正常肺组织的判断依据,探讨应用激光诱发荧光(LIF)光谱方法诊断肺癌的可行性。收集肺癌手术标本42例,使用三倍频YAG激光(波长355nm)和多光道分析仪(OMA)测定肺癌标本的LIF光谱,根据正常肺组织和肺癌组织的LIAF光谱特征,寻找能够区分两者的光谱差异,得出判断依据,并与病理结果比较。结果显示:①正常肺组织主峰(470.8±6.3)nm 较肺癌(463.7±4.8) nm向长波侧偏移(P<0.01),肺癌组织的荧光强度大于正常肺组织;②正常肺组织在580nm与600nm的荧光强度比为0.842±0.158,肺癌为1.269±0.147(P<0.01);③肺癌阳性判断标准域值:主峰波长λ<466.5nm;荧光强度比值为I580nm/I600nm≥1.073;与病理结果比较,符合荧光强度比值判断依据的判断敏感性为93.2%,特异性为88.1 %,阳性预测值为89.6%,阴性预测值为98.3%。
為確立激光誘髮自體熒光(LIAF)光譜,區分肺癌組織和正常肺組織的判斷依據,探討應用激光誘髮熒光(LIF)光譜方法診斷肺癌的可行性。收集肺癌手術標本42例,使用三倍頻YAG激光(波長355nm)和多光道分析儀(OMA)測定肺癌標本的LIF光譜,根據正常肺組織和肺癌組織的LIAF光譜特徵,尋找能夠區分兩者的光譜差異,得齣判斷依據,併與病理結果比較。結果顯示:①正常肺組織主峰(470.8±6.3)nm 較肺癌(463.7±4.8) nm嚮長波側偏移(P<0.01),肺癌組織的熒光彊度大于正常肺組織;②正常肺組織在580nm與600nm的熒光彊度比為0.842±0.158,肺癌為1.269±0.147(P<0.01);③肺癌暘性判斷標準域值:主峰波長λ<466.5nm;熒光彊度比值為I580nm/I600nm≥1.073;與病理結果比較,符閤熒光彊度比值判斷依據的判斷敏感性為93.2%,特異性為88.1 %,暘性預測值為89.6%,陰性預測值為98.3%。
위학립격광유발자체형광(LIAF)광보,구분폐암조직화정상폐조직적판단의거,탐토응용격광유발형광(LIF)광보방법진단폐암적가행성。수집폐암수술표본42례,사용삼배빈YAG격광(파장355nm)화다광도분석의(OMA)측정폐암표본적LIF광보,근거정상폐조직화폐암조직적LIAF광보특정,심조능구구분량자적광보차이,득출판단의거,병여병리결과비교。결과현시:①정상폐조직주봉(470.8±6.3)nm 교폐암(463.7±4.8) nm향장파측편이(P<0.01),폐암조직적형광강도대우정상폐조직;②정상폐조직재580nm여600nm적형광강도비위0.842±0.158,폐암위1.269±0.147(P<0.01);③폐암양성판단표준역치:주봉파장λ<466.5nm;형광강도비치위I580nm/I600nm≥1.073;여병리결과비교,부합형광강도비치판단의거적판단민감성위93.2%,특이성위88.1 %,양성예측치위89.6%,음성예측치위98.3%。
To obtain the criterion of Laser-induced Autofluorescence (LIF) spectroscopy in the differentiation of normal lung tissue and lung cancer and study the feasibility of LIF spectroscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer, the LIF spectra of normal lung and lung cancer in 42 surgical specimens have been measured with a detecting system which consists of an YAG laser(wavelength 355nm) and an optical multichannel analyzer(OMA). Spectroscopic differences between normal lung and cancerous tissues have been found which could be used as a criterion to distinguish from them . The pathological examinations were done to compare with the criterion. The results showed:① The location of the principal spectral peaks of the normal lung tissue (470.8±6.3)nm and lung cancer (463.7±4.8)nm are different(P<0.01), there is a red shift in the peak emission wavelength in normal lung tissue; and the fluorescence intensity of the lung cancer is higher than that of the normal lung tissue. ② In the normal lung tissue spectrum, there are two subsidiary maxima located clearly at 560 and 600nm and the cancer tissue spectrum shows an almost structureless and smoother profile with no subsidiary maxima. The mean fluorescence intensity ratio values at 560nm and 600nm were 0.842±0.158 for normal lung tissue and 1.269±0.147 for lung cancer(P<0.01). ③ The criterion for detection of lung cancer: the peak emission wavelength is shorter than 466.5nm; the fluorescence intensity ratio of I580nm/I600nmis larger or equal to 1.073. Compared with the pathological findings, the criterion can differentiate lung cancer from normal lung tissues with the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 93.2%, 88.1%, 89.6% and 98.3% respectively.