中国胸心血管外科临床杂志
中國胸心血管外科臨床雜誌
중국흉심혈관외과림상잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
2001年
1期
32-35
,共4页
杨敏%王一山%叶椿秀%朱洪生%陈长志
楊敏%王一山%葉椿秀%硃洪生%陳長誌
양민%왕일산%협춘수%주홍생%진장지
心室辅助装置%血流动力学%三磷酸腺苷%磷酸肌酸%超微结构
心室輔助裝置%血流動力學%三燐痠腺苷%燐痠肌痠%超微結構
심실보조장치%혈류동역학%삼린산선감%린산기산%초미결구
目的 比较左心室辅助装置(LVAD)和双心室辅助装置(BVAD)对缺血心肌再灌注后心脏血流动力学、心肌能量代谢物质和心肌超微结构中线粒体形态的影响。 方法 将16只绵羊随机分为LVAD组和BVAD组,每组8只,常温阻断升主动脉25分钟,造成双心室缺血损伤的动物模型。结扎右颈内动脉远端,在心脏复跳后应用转子泵分别行LVAD(左心室-右颈内动脉径路)和BVAD(左心室-右颈内动脉和右心室-肺动脉径路)辅助循环120分钟。测定血流动力学、心肌三磷酸腺苷、磷酸肌酸,观察心肌超微结构变化。 结果 施行BVAD或LVAD辅助循环的同时增加容量负荷能够显著改善心脏血流动力学,但LVAD组右心房压显著高于BVAD组(P<0.05);BVAD组右心室心肌三磷酸腺苷、磷酸肌酸含量和心肌线粒体比表面值均高于LVAD组(P<0.05)。 结论 BVAD比LVAD更有助于促进双心室缺血损伤心肌的功能恢复。
目的 比較左心室輔助裝置(LVAD)和雙心室輔助裝置(BVAD)對缺血心肌再灌註後心髒血流動力學、心肌能量代謝物質和心肌超微結構中線粒體形態的影響。 方法 將16隻綿羊隨機分為LVAD組和BVAD組,每組8隻,常溫阻斷升主動脈25分鐘,造成雙心室缺血損傷的動物模型。結扎右頸內動脈遠耑,在心髒複跳後應用轉子泵分彆行LVAD(左心室-右頸內動脈徑路)和BVAD(左心室-右頸內動脈和右心室-肺動脈徑路)輔助循環120分鐘。測定血流動力學、心肌三燐痠腺苷、燐痠肌痠,觀察心肌超微結構變化。 結果 施行BVAD或LVAD輔助循環的同時增加容量負荷能夠顯著改善心髒血流動力學,但LVAD組右心房壓顯著高于BVAD組(P<0.05);BVAD組右心室心肌三燐痠腺苷、燐痠肌痠含量和心肌線粒體比錶麵值均高于LVAD組(P<0.05)。 結論 BVAD比LVAD更有助于促進雙心室缺血損傷心肌的功能恢複。
목적 비교좌심실보조장치(LVAD)화쌍심실보조장치(BVAD)대결혈심기재관주후심장혈류동역학、심기능량대사물질화심기초미결구중선립체형태적영향。 방법 장16지면양수궤분위LVAD조화BVAD조,매조8지,상온조단승주동맥25분종,조성쌍심실결혈손상적동물모형。결찰우경내동맥원단,재심장복도후응용전자빙분별행LVAD(좌심실-우경내동맥경로)화BVAD(좌심실-우경내동맥화우심실-폐동맥경로)보조순배120분종。측정혈류동역학、심기삼린산선감、린산기산,관찰심기초미결구변화。 결과 시행BVAD혹LVAD보조순배적동시증가용량부하능구현저개선심장혈류동역학,단LVAD조우심방압현저고우BVAD조(P<0.05);BVAD조우심실심기삼린산선감、린산기산함량화심기선립체비표면치균고우LVAD조(P<0.05)。 결론 BVAD비LVAD경유조우촉진쌍심실결혈손상심기적공능회복。
Objective To compare the effects of biventricular assist devices (BVAD) and left ventricular assist devices(LVAD) on enhancing the myocardial recovery in an acute ovine model of global myocardial ischemia. Methods Sixteen adult sheep were randomly divided into LVAD group (n=8) and BVAD group (n=8). BVAD group consisted of left ventricle-right carotid artery bypass and right ventricle-pulmonary artery bypass. Two roller pumps with heat exchanger were used. LVAD group was connected from the apex of left ventricle and returned blood flow to the right carotid artery, and a roller pump. The aorta was clamped 25 minutes to produce a global ischemic injury after cross clamp was released. In both BVAD and LVAD group, the bypass was continued for an additional 120 minutes of reperfusion before further measurements were done. Hemodynamic changes, adenosine triphosphate and creatine phosphate were measured. Myocardial ultrastructure were observed. Results LVAD could maintain nearly normal circulation with high right atrial pressure by volume loading. However, BVAD group showed superiority in hemodynamics changes. Adenosine triphosphate and creatine phosphate of the right ventricular myocardium in the BVAD group was higher than that of LVAD group (P<0.05). Myocardial ultrastructural damage in BVAD group was milder than that of LVAD group. The data showed that specific surface-value of mitochondria of right ventricle myocardium was higher in BVAD group than that of LVAD group (P<0.05). Conclusion BVAD is superior to LVAD for biventricular global ischemia.