地球物理学报
地毬物理學報
지구물이학보
2010年
3期
567-575
,共9页
张学民%刘静%申旭辉%M.Parrot%钱家栋%欧阳新艳%赵庶凡%黄建平
張學民%劉靜%申旭輝%M.Parrot%錢傢棟%歐暘新豔%趙庶凡%黃建平
장학민%류정%신욱휘%M.Parrot%전가동%구양신염%조서범%황건평
苏门答腊地震%DEMETER%电离层扰动%电场
囌門答臘地震%DEMETER%電離層擾動%電場
소문답석지진%DEMETER%전리층우동%전장
Sumatra Earthquake%DEMETER%Ionospheric perturbation%Electric field
2005年3月28日苏门答腊发生8.6级地震,通过分析处在地磁活动平静期的震前15天的数据,发现3月20、22、23和28日在赤道区域多个参量上出现电离层扰动,如电场和等离子体参量,认为这些电离层扰动可能与本次强震有关.震前电子密度异常有两种形态,一种是在原来的峰值变化区电子密度单调增加,幅度超过1σ,如3月20日和28日的异常;另外一种是改变了原来在赤道区的单峰变化形态,而呈现了双峰值和赤道谷值的变化形态,如3月22日和23日的扰动.分析结果显示,这两种形态的电子密度扰动都分布在一个比较大的范围内,经度上跨越100°,纬度范围30°,显示了比较长的异常持续时间和全球变化特性.VLF频段电场频谱的数据分析表明双峰形态的扰动不是磁共轭效应.同时低频电场扰动相对电子密度而言集中在一个相对小范围内,当N_e单调上升时,电场扰动却只出现在离震中最近的轨道上.分析认为震源产生的电场信号直接传播进入电离层是非常困难的,但是它可以通过岩石层-大气层-电离层圈层耦合机制造成电离层扰动.结合离子成分及其变化形态的分析,震前氧离子变化形态与氢、氦离子的形态相反,这与其他地震前的电离层异常扰动形态是类似的.综合分析认为,对于与地震相关的电离层异常的识别需要结合多个观测参量的联合分析.
2005年3月28日囌門答臘髮生8.6級地震,通過分析處在地磁活動平靜期的震前15天的數據,髮現3月20、22、23和28日在赤道區域多箇參量上齣現電離層擾動,如電場和等離子體參量,認為這些電離層擾動可能與本次彊震有關.震前電子密度異常有兩種形態,一種是在原來的峰值變化區電子密度單調增加,幅度超過1σ,如3月20日和28日的異常;另外一種是改變瞭原來在赤道區的單峰變化形態,而呈現瞭雙峰值和赤道穀值的變化形態,如3月22日和23日的擾動.分析結果顯示,這兩種形態的電子密度擾動都分佈在一箇比較大的範圍內,經度上跨越100°,緯度範圍30°,顯示瞭比較長的異常持續時間和全毬變化特性.VLF頻段電場頻譜的數據分析錶明雙峰形態的擾動不是磁共軛效應.同時低頻電場擾動相對電子密度而言集中在一箇相對小範圍內,噹N_e單調上升時,電場擾動卻隻齣現在離震中最近的軌道上.分析認為震源產生的電場信號直接傳播進入電離層是非常睏難的,但是它可以通過巖石層-大氣層-電離層圈層耦閤機製造成電離層擾動.結閤離子成分及其變化形態的分析,震前氧離子變化形態與氫、氦離子的形態相反,這與其他地震前的電離層異常擾動形態是類似的.綜閤分析認為,對于與地震相關的電離層異常的識彆需要結閤多箇觀測參量的聯閤分析.
2005년3월28일소문답석발생8.6급지진,통과분석처재지자활동평정기적진전15천적수거,발현3월20、22、23화28일재적도구역다개삼량상출현전리층우동,여전장화등리자체삼량,인위저사전리층우동가능여본차강진유관.진전전자밀도이상유량충형태,일충시재원래적봉치변화구전자밀도단조증가,폭도초과1σ,여3월20일화28일적이상;령외일충시개변료원래재적도구적단봉변화형태,이정현료쌍봉치화적도곡치적변화형태,여3월22일화23일적우동.분석결과현시,저량충형태적전자밀도우동도분포재일개비교대적범위내,경도상과월100°,위도범위30°,현시료비교장적이상지속시간화전구변화특성.VLF빈단전장빈보적수거분석표명쌍봉형태적우동불시자공액효응.동시저빈전장우동상대전자밀도이언집중재일개상대소범위내,당N_e단조상승시,전장우동각지출현재리진중최근적궤도상.분석인위진원산생적전장신호직접전파진입전리층시비상곤난적,단시타가이통과암석층-대기층-전리층권층우합궤제조성전리층우동.결합리자성분급기변화형태적분석,진전양리자변화형태여경、양리자적형태상반,저여기타지진전적전리층이상우동형태시유사적.종합분석인위,대우여지진상관적전리층이상적식별수요결합다개관측삼량적연합분석.
During 15 days in a relative quiet geomagnetic time around the M8.6 Sumatra earthquake on 28 March 2005, ionospheric perturbations occurred before this event on March 20, 22, 23, and 28,2005 in many parameters such as the electric field and plasma parameters in the equatorial area. Since it was a quiet magnetic time, those four days referred above may be related to the preparation for this strong earthquake. The electron density showed two types of anomalies, one being a monotone increase in the single peak values with amplitudes exceeding 1σ, such as on March 20 and 28 in 2005; the other one changing the normal single peak to double crests and a trough in the equatorial area, which occurred on March 22 and 23, 2005. Both the anomalies are distributed over a very large area of 100°longitude and 30°latitude, presenting a long duration and global feature. The study of VLF electric field spectrums demonstrated that those anomalies were not presented in the geomagnetic conjugate feature. Electric field perturbations were concentrated in a relative smaller area than those of N_e, occurring only in the nearest orbit to the epicentre with only monotone increasing N_e anomalies. It is thought that it is difficult for an electric field generated close to the seismic preparation area in the equatorial area to penetrate into the ionosphere directly, but it may occur through the coupling mechanism of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere. Combined with the analysis of ion composition and varying shape, this shows that prior to this earthquake the variation in oxygen density reversed to that of hydrogen and helium density, similarly to other ionospheric precursors before other earthquakes. It is concluded that conjoint analysis among different parameters should be applied in order to distinguish the precursors related to the earthquakes.