CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比非接触式眼压计与压陷式眼压计所测量的眼压值,以评价非接触式眼压计的临床应用价值.方法将在门诊做眼压筛查的160例患者320只眼纳人本观察,采用自身前后对照法,对比非接触式眼压计(简称NCT)与压陷式眼压计测量的眼压值.结果用NCT测量的眼压值显著低于压陷式眼压计的测量值.结论 NCT测量的眼压值显著低于压陷式眼压计测量的眼压值,对于NCT眼压在2.67 kPa者,最好用压陷式眼压计再测1次或间隔复诊.
목적 대비비접촉식안압계여압함식안압계소측량적안압치,이평개비접촉식안압계적림상응용개치.방법 장재문진주안압사사적160례환자320지안납인본관찰,채용자신전후대조법,대비비접촉식안압계(간칭NCT)여압함식안압계측량적안압치.결과 용NCT측량적안압치현저저우압함식안압계적측량치.결론 NCT측량적안압치현저저우압함식안압계측량적안압치,대우NCT안압재2.67 kPa자,최호용압함식안압계재측1차혹간격복진.
Objective To compare the measured IOP values by non-contact tonometer and indentation tonometer in order to evaluate the non-contact tonometer in clinical application. Methods 320 eyes of 160 patients for screening of IOP in the clinic were included in the observation, by self-control study, the IOP value of the non-contact tonometer(abbreviated NCT) and the indentation tonometer was compared. Results IOP values measured by NCT was lower than that mesgured by indentation tonometer. Conclusions IOP values measured by NCT was lower than that measured by indentation tonometer, for IOP value around 2.67 kPa measured by NCT, it is best to use indentation tonometer to retest or coming again for subsequent visit.