中国急救医学
中國急救醫學
중국급구의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
2009年
10期
920-922
,共3页
孟新科%赵中江%周泽强%刘德红%魏刚%赵志刚%苏顺庭
孟新科%趙中江%週澤彊%劉德紅%魏剛%趙誌剛%囌順庭
맹신과%조중강%주택강%류덕홍%위강%조지강%소순정
改良早期预警评分(MEWS)%急诊%观察病房%管理
改良早期預警評分(MEWS)%急診%觀察病房%管理
개량조기예경평분(MEWS)%급진%관찰병방%관리
Modified early warning score%Emergency%Observation ward%Administration
目的 探讨改良早期预警评分(MEWS)在急诊留观患者风险管理中的应用价值.方法 通过动态监测MEWS,决定患者处理策略和去向;比较不同流向患者评分的差异;调查医生、护士对实施MEWS管理模式的满意度.结果 评分无动态变化的245例患者MEWS为(2.6±1.2)分;有动态变化的44例中,直接收住院的32例患者评分为(4.6±1.7)分;转抢救室12例患者评分为(6.2±2.4)分.各组患者评分比较差异均有统计学意义(2.6±1.2 vs.4.6±1.7,t=3.44,P=0.003;2.6±1.2 vs.6.2±2.4,t=5.10,P=0.000;4.6±1.7 vs.6.2±2.4,t=2.79,P=0.007);医生、护士对实施MEWS动态监测前后的留观患者管理满意度分别为75.5%和94.3%,前后比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2 =7.36,P<0.01).结论 MEWS可作为急诊留观患者风险管理和合理分流的有效工具,值得临床推广.
目的 探討改良早期預警評分(MEWS)在急診留觀患者風險管理中的應用價值.方法 通過動態鑑測MEWS,決定患者處理策略和去嚮;比較不同流嚮患者評分的差異;調查醫生、護士對實施MEWS管理模式的滿意度.結果 評分無動態變化的245例患者MEWS為(2.6±1.2)分;有動態變化的44例中,直接收住院的32例患者評分為(4.6±1.7)分;轉搶救室12例患者評分為(6.2±2.4)分.各組患者評分比較差異均有統計學意義(2.6±1.2 vs.4.6±1.7,t=3.44,P=0.003;2.6±1.2 vs.6.2±2.4,t=5.10,P=0.000;4.6±1.7 vs.6.2±2.4,t=2.79,P=0.007);醫生、護士對實施MEWS動態鑑測前後的留觀患者管理滿意度分彆為75.5%和94.3%,前後比較差異有統計學意義(χ~2 =7.36,P<0.01).結論 MEWS可作為急診留觀患者風險管理和閤理分流的有效工具,值得臨床推廣.
목적 탐토개량조기예경평분(MEWS)재급진류관환자풍험관리중적응용개치.방법 통과동태감측MEWS,결정환자처리책략화거향;비교불동류향환자평분적차이;조사의생、호사대실시MEWS관리모식적만의도.결과 평분무동태변화적245례환자MEWS위(2.6±1.2)분;유동태변화적44례중,직접수주원적32례환자평분위(4.6±1.7)분;전창구실12례환자평분위(6.2±2.4)분.각조환자평분비교차이균유통계학의의(2.6±1.2 vs.4.6±1.7,t=3.44,P=0.003;2.6±1.2 vs.6.2±2.4,t=5.10,P=0.000;4.6±1.7 vs.6.2±2.4,t=2.79,P=0.007);의생、호사대실시MEWS동태감측전후적류관환자관리만의도분별위75.5%화94.3%,전후비교차이유통계학의의(χ~2 =7.36,P<0.01).결론 MEWS가작위급진류관환자풍험관리화합리분류적유효공구,치득림상추엄.
Objective To explore the application value of modified early warning score (MEWS) in the administration of patients in emergency observation ward. Methods Triage criteria were determined by MEWS and the scores were compared among different admission departments.Approval of"MEWS administration model" was investigated in doctors and nurses of emergency department. Results There were significant differences in MEWS among different admission departments,(2.6±1.2) for 245 patients who had no changes in MEWS vs.(4.6±1.7) for 32 hospital admission patients who had the increases in MEWS (t=3.44,P=0.003);(2.6±1.2) vs(6.2±2.4) for 12 emergency rescue room admission patients who also had the increases in MEWS(t=5.10,P=0.000);(4.6±1.7) vs.(6.2±2.4),(t=2.79,P=0.007).Approval of"MEWS administration model"in doctors and nurses of emergency department was 75.5% for non"MEWS administration model" vs. 94.3% for "MEWS administration model" (χ~2 =7.36,P<0.01). Conclusion MEWS may be popularized in emergency observation ward as a tool of risk administration for the patients.