CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨《中华儿科杂志》刊出论文的被引用情况.方法检索万方数据医学网中《中华儿科杂志》2001至2010年发表的论文,及其被引频次、栏目、基金资助情况,分析其与论文被引的关系.结果 2001至2010年,《中华儿科杂志》共刊出论文3209篇,其中2073篇被引用,被引论文占全部论文的64.60％,总被引频次为18 546次,篇均被引5.78次.各栏目中,“标准·方案·指南”栏目刊出的文章篇均被引频次最高,为62.92次；重点号论文,包括述评(7.12次/篇)、专论(6.50次/篇)、论著的被引用情况均较好,篇均被引频次(7.90次)高于普通论著(6.03次).有明确学术观点的评论性论文,例如“观点·争鸣·讨论”栏目刊出的文章被引情况也较好,篇均被引频次为7.09次；“快速通道”论文100％被引用,篇均被引频次达到16.20次.基金资助论文被引频次没有明显优势,基金资助论文篇均被引频次为4.81次,低于全部论文的篇均5.78次,更低于非基金论文的篇均6.06次,略高于去除“标准·方案·指南”栏目后的非基金论文篇均被引4.36次.结论不同栏目的被引情况差异较大.应进一步加强约稿,增加评论性文章、高质量的论著的数量.基金资助论文和非基金资助论文,应该采用相同的取舍标准.
목적 탐토《중화인과잡지》간출논문적피인용정황.방법 검색만방수거의학망중《중화인과잡지》2001지2010년발표적논문,급기피인빈차、란목、기금자조정황,분석기여논문피인적관계.결과 2001지2010년,《중화인과잡지》공간출논문3209편,기중2073편피인용,피인논문점전부논문적64.60％,총피인빈차위18 546차,편균피인5.78차.각란목중,“표준·방안·지남”란목간출적문장편균피인빈차최고,위62.92차；중점호논문,포괄술평(7.12차/편)、전론(6.50차/편)、론저적피인용정황균교호,편균피인빈차(7.90차)고우보통론저(6.03차).유명학학술관점적평론성논문,례여“관점·쟁명·토론”란목간출적문장피인정황야교호,편균피인빈차위7.09차；“쾌속통도”논문100％피인용,편균피인빈차체도16.20차.기금자조논문피인빈차몰유명현우세,기금자조논문편균피인빈차위4.81차,저우전부논문적편균5.78차,경저우비기금논문적편균6.06차,략고우거제“표준·방안·지남”란목후적비기금논문편균피인4.36차.결론 불동란목적피인정황차이교대.응진일보가강약고,증가평론성문장、고질량적론저적수량.기금자조논문화비기금자조논문,응해채용상동적취사표준.
Objective The present study was designed to explore the cited status and its correlated factors of articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Method Articles published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics from 2001 to 2010 were searched using Wanfang Medical Online database,and the relationship between cited number and column and funding status were analyzed. Results Totally 3209articles were published by Chinese Journal of Pediatrics from 2001 to 2010.Two thousand and seventy-three articles (64.60％ ) were cited.The total cited number was 18 546 (mean rate:5.78 per paper).Standard/protocol/guideline was the most often cited column (mean rate:62.92 per paper). Featured articles including editorials ( mean rate:7.12 per paper),special articles ( mean rate:6.50 per paper) and original articles ( mean rate:7.90 per paper) had higher cited rate.Cited rate of original papers in featured articles was higher than other original articles ( mean rate:6.03 per paper). Those with academic perspectives,such as Opinion/Debate/Discussion,were well cited (mean rate:7.09 per paper).All of original articles in Rapid Pathway were well cited (mean rate:16.20 per paper). Mean cited number of grant-supported articles was 4.81 per paper,lower than that of all kinds of papers (mean rate:5.78 per paper) and nongrant-supported articles (mean rate:6.06 per paper).However,it was slightly higher than that of articles except Standard/protocol/guideline (mean rate:4.36 per paper).Conclusion Cited status varies among columns.The invited papers should be increased in number to raise commentary papers and original articles with high quality.Grant-supported or non-grant-supported papers should be reviewed based on the same standard after submission.