中华医学美学美容杂志
中華醫學美學美容雜誌
중화의학미학미용잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AESTHETICS AND COSMETOLOGY
2008年
5期
322-325
,共4页
许跃%蔡斌%古文珍%陈扬熙
許躍%蔡斌%古文珍%陳颺熙
허약%채빈%고문진%진양희
舌侧正畸%直丝弓技术%错(牙合)畸形%头影测量
舌側正畸%直絲弓技術%錯(牙閤)畸形%頭影測量
설측정기%직사궁기술%착(아합)기형%두영측량
Lingual orthodontics%Straight wire technique%Malocclusion%Cephalome-try
目的 通过评价舌侧正畸对患者口腔功能和美观的干扰,初步探讨舌侧正畸中临床与技工室技术操作的要点.方法 通过收集安氏床Ⅰ类牙列拥挤患者30例,分为两组,每组15例,分别行舌侧正畸和传统唇侧正畸非拔牙治疗,在粘结矫治器当天、7 d、28 d,56 d分别对软组织不适感、进食困难、语音障碍、外观影响等指标进行评估比较,并进行术前和术后头影测量分析.结果 舌侧正畸技术与传统唇侧正畸技术相比较,在对美观方面有明显的优势(P<0.01);语音障碍在粘结舌侧托槽当日和7 d内差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),进食困难在两组间的差异持续到28 d左右(P<0.01).结论 在开始治疗的前2个月内,发音和进食困难是舌侧正畸最大的不足.然而,舌侧正畸在美观方面具有不可替代的优势,必将成为正畸学的发展方向之一.
目的 通過評價舌側正畸對患者口腔功能和美觀的榦擾,初步探討舌側正畸中臨床與技工室技術操作的要點.方法 通過收集安氏床Ⅰ類牙列擁擠患者30例,分為兩組,每組15例,分彆行舌側正畸和傳統脣側正畸非拔牙治療,在粘結矯治器噹天、7 d、28 d,56 d分彆對軟組織不適感、進食睏難、語音障礙、外觀影響等指標進行評估比較,併進行術前和術後頭影測量分析.結果 舌側正畸技術與傳統脣側正畸技術相比較,在對美觀方麵有明顯的優勢(P<0.01);語音障礙在粘結舌側託槽噹日和7 d內差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),進食睏難在兩組間的差異持續到28 d左右(P<0.01).結論 在開始治療的前2箇月內,髮音和進食睏難是舌側正畸最大的不足.然而,舌側正畸在美觀方麵具有不可替代的優勢,必將成為正畸學的髮展方嚮之一.
목적 통과평개설측정기대환자구강공능화미관적간우,초보탐토설측정기중림상여기공실기술조작적요점.방법 통과수집안씨상Ⅰ류아렬옹제환자30례,분위량조,매조15례,분별행설측정기화전통진측정기비발아치료,재점결교치기당천、7 d、28 d,56 d분별대연조직불괄감、진식곤난、어음장애、외관영향등지표진행평고비교,병진행술전화술후두영측량분석.결과 설측정기기술여전통진측정기기술상비교,재대미관방면유명현적우세(P<0.01);어음장애재점결설측탁조당일화7 d내차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),진식곤난재량조간적차이지속도28 d좌우(P<0.01).결론 재개시치료적전2개월내,발음화진식곤난시설측정기최대적불족.연이,설측정기재미관방면구유불가체대적우세,필장성위정기학적발전방향지일.
Objective To evaluate the functional and aesthetic disturbance of patients treated with lingual orthodontic surgery and to investigate the key points of laboratory procedure and clinical treatment of lingual orthodontic deformity. Methods A total of 30 cases of Angle class Ⅰ with moder-ate crowding were selected. They were equally divided into two groups: one group was treated using lingual brackets, and the other using conventional labial brackets. Each patient completed a four-part survey right after the bracket placing and 7, 28, 56 days after the treatment. The differences of tongue-lip-cheek soreness, eating and speech difficulties and aesthetic problems were evaluated be-tween two groups. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the start of the treatment and the end of the overall treatment. Results Speech difficulties of lingual orthodontics were significantly greater (P<0.01) than that in the labial orthodontics group in the first week of the treatment. Eating difficulties were greater (P<0.01) in the lingual orthodontics group by 28 days, whereas aesthetic problems were greater in group using labial appliance than group lingual appliance. Conclusions In the first two months of the orthodontic treatment, eating and speech difficulties are the most severe problems for the lingual group. Lingual orthodontics offers important aesthetic advantages over labial orthodontics, and it will be one of the development directions of current orthodontics.