中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRIMARY MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2011年
19期
2621-2623
,共3页
韩志强%田明庆%石峰%胡华成
韓誌彊%田明慶%石峰%鬍華成
한지강%전명경%석봉%호화성
肺肿瘤%肿瘤标记,生物学
肺腫瘤%腫瘤標記,生物學
폐종류%종류표기,생물학
Lung neoplasms%Tumor markers,biological
目的:探讨肺癌患者血清肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的水平及化疗治疗前后的变化。方法用放射免疫分析的方法分别测定20例肺部良性疾病、20例小细胞肺癌(SCLC)以及45例初诊晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者化疗前后血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE的水平,再分别作对比分析。结果肺癌组CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE水平高于良性疾病组,但CYFRA21-1在良性疾病和小细胞肺癌中、NSE在良性疾病和鳞癌以及良性疾病和腺癌中差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);化疗后小细胞肺癌患者NSE显著下降[(55.22±17.48) μg/L与(17.92±3.98) μg/L,t=6.07,P<0.01],鳞癌患者CYFRA21-1水平显著下降(P<0.01),但在腺癌患者只有NSE水平较化疗前下降(P<0.05)。结论三种肿瘤标志物在非小细胞肺癌晚期均升高,其中CEA在腺癌、CYFRA21-1在鳞癌、NSE在SCLC中尤为明显,化疗后显著下降,以作为判定不同病理类型肺癌化疗疗效的指标。
目的:探討肺癌患者血清腫瘤標誌物癌胚抗原(CEA)、細胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、神經元特異性烯醇化酶(NSE)的水平及化療治療前後的變化。方法用放射免疫分析的方法分彆測定20例肺部良性疾病、20例小細胞肺癌(SCLC)以及45例初診晚期非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者化療前後血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE的水平,再分彆作對比分析。結果肺癌組CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE水平高于良性疾病組,但CYFRA21-1在良性疾病和小細胞肺癌中、NSE在良性疾病和鱗癌以及良性疾病和腺癌中差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05);化療後小細胞肺癌患者NSE顯著下降[(55.22±17.48) μg/L與(17.92±3.98) μg/L,t=6.07,P<0.01],鱗癌患者CYFRA21-1水平顯著下降(P<0.01),但在腺癌患者隻有NSE水平較化療前下降(P<0.05)。結論三種腫瘤標誌物在非小細胞肺癌晚期均升高,其中CEA在腺癌、CYFRA21-1在鱗癌、NSE在SCLC中尤為明顯,化療後顯著下降,以作為判定不同病理類型肺癌化療療效的指標。
목적:탐토폐암환자혈청종류표지물암배항원(CEA)、세포각단백19편단(CYFRA21-1)、신경원특이성희순화매(NSE)적수평급화료치료전후적변화。방법용방사면역분석적방법분별측정20례폐부량성질병、20례소세포폐암(SCLC)이급45례초진만기비소세포폐암(NSCLC)환자화료전후혈청CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE적수평,재분별작대비분석。결과폐암조CEA、CYFRA21-1、NSE수평고우량성질병조,단CYFRA21-1재량성질병화소세포폐암중、NSE재량성질병화린암이급량성질병화선암중차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05);화료후소세포폐암환자NSE현저하강[(55.22±17.48) μg/L여(17.92±3.98) μg/L,t=6.07,P<0.01],린암환자CYFRA21-1수평현저하강(P<0.01),단재선암환자지유NSE수평교화료전하강(P<0.05)。결론삼충종류표지물재비소세포폐암만기균승고,기중CEA재선암、CYFRA21-1재린암、NSE재SCLC중우위명현,화료후현저하강,이작위판정불동병리류형폐암화료료효적지표。
Objective To investigate the serum tumor markers level of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) ,cytokeratin fragment antigen21-1 (CYFRA21-1),neuron specific enolase (NSE) in patients with lung cancer, and the change after chemotherapy on them. Methods Radioimmunoassay was applied to detect the levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1 ,NSE in 45 patients with advanced NSCLC before and after chemotherapy,and the tumor markers were also detected in 20 patients with SCLC and 20 patients with benign lung diseases of control groups. Results The levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE in lung cancer group before chemotherapy were much higher than benign group, but there was no difference of CYFRA21-1 between the SCLC group and benign group. The same result of NSE was found between NSCLC and benign group(P >0. 05). The value of NSE was lower in the patients with SCLC after chemotherapy than before(P <0. 01 ). The level of CYFRA21-1 was lower in squamous carcinoma than before( P <0. 01 ). But in the adenocarcinoma group only NSE's level was lower after chemotherapy( P >0. 05) ,there were no differences in CEA and CYFRA21-1 ( P > 0. 05 ). Conclusion The levels of the three tumor markers rise obviously in advanced NSCLC and decrease after chemotherapy. The differences were significant with NSE in SCLC and CYFRA21-1 in squamous cell carcinoma and CEA in adenocarcinoma. The levels of serum CEA,CYFRA21-1 and NSE could be a tumor marker in progressive lung cancer. And the decrease of the levels could be used to evaluate the chemotherapeutic response respectively in different pathologic types of lung cancer.