中国安全科学学报
中國安全科學學報
중국안전과학학보
CHINA SAFETY SCIENCE JOURNAL(CSSJ)
2009年
11期
56-61
,共6页
平板模型%液化石油气(LPG)%泄漏扩散%模拟%风险评价
平闆模型%液化石油氣(LPG)%洩漏擴散%模擬%風險評價
평판모형%액화석유기(LPG)%설루확산%모의%풍험평개
slab model%liquefied petroleum gas(LPG)%leakage diffusion%simulation%risk evaluatinn
对目前主要的气体泄漏扩散模拟计算模型进行比较分析,选择平板模型用于液化石油气连续泄漏扩散模拟计算,运用假设中型和大型泄漏的计算实例结果,通过与挪威船级社(DNV)开发的SAFETI风险评价软件的计算结果进行对比分析,可以得出:在静风条件下,平板模型对液化石油气连续泄漏扩散模拟的准确性高.随着云团扩散密度降低,平板模型计算偏差逐步加大,且计算偏差随风速的增大而变大,因而利用平板模型进行模拟计算的结果应予修正.
對目前主要的氣體洩漏擴散模擬計算模型進行比較分析,選擇平闆模型用于液化石油氣連續洩漏擴散模擬計算,運用假設中型和大型洩漏的計算實例結果,通過與挪威船級社(DNV)開髮的SAFETI風險評價軟件的計算結果進行對比分析,可以得齣:在靜風條件下,平闆模型對液化石油氣連續洩漏擴散模擬的準確性高.隨著雲糰擴散密度降低,平闆模型計算偏差逐步加大,且計算偏差隨風速的增大而變大,因而利用平闆模型進行模擬計算的結果應予脩正.
대목전주요적기체설루확산모의계산모형진행비교분석,선택평판모형용우액화석유기련속설루확산모의계산,운용가설중형화대형설루적계산실례결과,통과여나위선급사(DNV)개발적SAFETI풍험평개연건적계산결과진행대비분석,가이득출:재정풍조건하,평판모형대액화석유기련속설루확산모의적준학성고.수착운단확산밀도강저,평판모형계산편차축보가대,차계산편차수풍속적증대이변대,인이이용평판모형진행모의계산적결과응여수정.
Based on the comparative analysis of the main calculation models for gas leakage and diffusion simulation,the slab model Was selected to make a simulated calculation of the continuous leakage of liquefled petroleum gas(LPG).For the two situations of medium leakage and large leakage,a comparison was made between the result calculated by slab model and that gotten by SAFETI risk assessment software,developed by Det Norske Veritas(DNV).The analysis shows that,in the calm wind conditions.the simulation result of the leakage and diffusion of LPG with slab model is more accurate;but with the deereasing of clouds density,the calculation deviation with slab model gradually increases,and the deviation will increase with the increasing of wind speed.So,the simulation result gained by slab model must be revised.