中华胃肠外科杂志
中華胃腸外科雜誌
중화위장외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
2012年
5期
473-475
,共3页
柳硕岩%陈啸风%王枫%郑庆丰
柳碩巖%陳嘯風%王楓%鄭慶豐
류석암%진소풍%왕풍%정경봉
食管肿瘤%肠内营养%安素%能全素%百普力
食管腫瘤%腸內營養%安素%能全素%百普力
식관종류%장내영양%안소%능전소%백보력
Esophageal neoplasms%Enteral nutrition%Ensure%Nutrison%Peptison
目的 比较食管癌患者术后安素、能全素和百普力3种早期肠内营养配方的治疗效益.方法 前瞻性入组2011年9-11月间福建省肿瘤医院胸外科收治的45例食管癌患者,按随机数字表法分为安素组、能全素组和百普力组,每组均15例.各组患者均于术后第2天给予管饲肠内营养素,连续8d.分别于术前1d和术后9d空腹采血以检测患者的白蛋白和前白蛋白,并记录术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、相关并发症发生率及营养支持费用.结果 3组患者术后营养指标(血清白蛋白和前白蛋白)及肠内营养相关并发症发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).安素组和能全素组患者术后肠道功能恢复时间分别为(52.4±15.73)h和(50.8±12.4)h,均明显快于百普力组[(60.3±16.8)h,P<0.05].安素组患者营养支持费用为(443.3±45.8)元,明显低于能全素组[ (639.5±52.6)元]和百普力组[(990.5±95.5)元](P<O.01).结论 安素、能全素和百普力3种肠内营养制剂用于食管癌患者术后早期肠内营养支持,其营养效果和并发症发生率相同;安素治疗费用最低.
目的 比較食管癌患者術後安素、能全素和百普力3種早期腸內營養配方的治療效益.方法 前瞻性入組2011年9-11月間福建省腫瘤醫院胸外科收治的45例食管癌患者,按隨機數字錶法分為安素組、能全素組和百普力組,每組均15例.各組患者均于術後第2天給予管飼腸內營養素,連續8d.分彆于術前1d和術後9d空腹採血以檢測患者的白蛋白和前白蛋白,併記錄術後胃腸道功能恢複時間、相關併髮癥髮生率及營養支持費用.結果 3組患者術後營養指標(血清白蛋白和前白蛋白)及腸內營養相關併髮癥髮生率的差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).安素組和能全素組患者術後腸道功能恢複時間分彆為(52.4±15.73)h和(50.8±12.4)h,均明顯快于百普力組[(60.3±16.8)h,P<0.05].安素組患者營養支持費用為(443.3±45.8)元,明顯低于能全素組[ (639.5±52.6)元]和百普力組[(990.5±95.5)元](P<O.01).結論 安素、能全素和百普力3種腸內營養製劑用于食管癌患者術後早期腸內營養支持,其營養效果和併髮癥髮生率相同;安素治療費用最低.
목적 비교식관암환자술후안소、능전소화백보력3충조기장내영양배방적치료효익.방법 전첨성입조2011년9-11월간복건성종류의원흉외과수치적45례식관암환자,안수궤수자표법분위안소조、능전소조화백보력조,매조균15례.각조환자균우술후제2천급여관사장내영양소,련속8d.분별우술전1d화술후9d공복채혈이검측환자적백단백화전백단백,병기록술후위장도공능회복시간、상관병발증발생솔급영양지지비용.결과 3조환자술후영양지표(혈청백단백화전백단백)급장내영양상관병발증발생솔적차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).안소조화능전소조환자술후장도공능회복시간분별위(52.4±15.73)h화(50.8±12.4)h,균명현쾌우백보력조[(60.3±16.8)h,P<0.05].안소조환자영양지지비용위(443.3±45.8)원,명현저우능전소조[ (639.5±52.6)원]화백보력조[(990.5±95.5)원](P<O.01).결론 안소、능전소화백보력3충장내영양제제용우식관암환자술후조기장내영양지지,기영양효과화병발증발생솔상동;안소치료비용최저.
Objective To compare the efficiency of different early enteral nutrition (EN) with Ensure,Nutrison,and Peptison in postoperative patients with esophageal carcinoma.Methods A total of 45 postoperative patients with esophageal carcinoma were randomly divided into three groups using random digit table:Ensure group (n=15),Nutrition group (n=15),and Peptison group (n=15).Enteral nutrition was given using nasogastric tube from the 2nd postoperative day for 8 days.Albumin and prealbumin were detected on the day before surgery and postoperative day 9 after fasting.The time to gastrointestinal tract function recovery,complications,and the cost of enteral nutrition were compared among the three groups.Results There were no significant differences in postoperative nutrition indices(albumin and prealbumin)and EN-related complications among the three groups (all P>0.05).The time to gastrointestinal tract function recovery in Ensure group [(52.4±15.7) h]and Nutrison group [(50.8±12.4) h]was less than that in Peptison group [(60.3±16.8) h](P<0.05).The expense of Ensure group [(443.3±45.8) RMB]was obviously less than that of Nutrison group [ (639.5±52.6) RMB ]and Peptison group [ (990.5±95.5)RMB](both P <0.01 ).Conclusions Ensure,Nutrison and Peptison can be used for postoperative early enteral nutrition in patients with esophageal carcinoma,and the efficacy and complication are comparable.The cost of Ensure is the lowest.