中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)
中華乳腺病雜誌(電子版)
중화유선병잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BREAST DISEASE(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2009年
2期
154-162
,共9页
林清萍%欧阳秋芳%赵红佳%吴辛颖%高尤亮
林清萍%歐暘鞦芳%趙紅佳%吳辛穎%高尤亮
림청평%구양추방%조홍가%오신영%고우량
超声检查%血管造影术%乳腺肿瘤%淋巴结转移
超聲檢查%血管造影術%乳腺腫瘤%淋巴結轉移
초성검사%혈관조영술%유선종류%림파결전이
Ultrasonography%Angiography%Breast neoplasms%Lymph node metastasis
目的 探讨超声造影对诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的应用价值.方法 对141例浸润型乳腺癌患者行乳腺病灶及腋窝淋巴结常规超声检查后,再对腋窝淋巴结进行超声造影,先用目测法观察淋巴结超声造影增强模式,再用QontraXt软件分析超声造影时间-强度曲线参数.根据超声造影灌注特点,将腋窝淋巴结分为淋巴结转移组(有转移组)和无淋巴结转移组(无转移组),并与病理检查结果相比较.增强模式之间的对比采用χ2检验,造影参数用单因素方差分析.结果 淋巴结有转移组灌注模式表现为不均匀增强型或无增强,淋巴结无转移组表现为均匀型增强,两组灌注模式之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.000).两组造影剂到达时间、达峰时间、峰值强度之间的差异无统计学意义 (P值分别为0.129、0.094、0.140).淋巴结实质内高灌注区与低灌注区的差值(SImax- SImin)有转移组大于无转移组(P=0.000).以SImax- SImin 值大于28为最佳临界点,鉴别的灵敏度为93.3%,特异度为80.8%.结论 超声造影对鉴别乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移有一定的临床价值..
目的 探討超聲造影對診斷乳腺癌腋窩淋巴結轉移的應用價值.方法 對141例浸潤型乳腺癌患者行乳腺病竈及腋窩淋巴結常規超聲檢查後,再對腋窩淋巴結進行超聲造影,先用目測法觀察淋巴結超聲造影增彊模式,再用QontraXt軟件分析超聲造影時間-彊度麯線參數.根據超聲造影灌註特點,將腋窩淋巴結分為淋巴結轉移組(有轉移組)和無淋巴結轉移組(無轉移組),併與病理檢查結果相比較.增彊模式之間的對比採用χ2檢驗,造影參數用單因素方差分析.結果 淋巴結有轉移組灌註模式錶現為不均勻增彊型或無增彊,淋巴結無轉移組錶現為均勻型增彊,兩組灌註模式之間的差異有統計學意義(P=0.000).兩組造影劑到達時間、達峰時間、峰值彊度之間的差異無統計學意義 (P值分彆為0.129、0.094、0.140).淋巴結實質內高灌註區與低灌註區的差值(SImax- SImin)有轉移組大于無轉移組(P=0.000).以SImax- SImin 值大于28為最佳臨界點,鑒彆的靈敏度為93.3%,特異度為80.8%.結論 超聲造影對鑒彆乳腺癌腋窩淋巴結轉移有一定的臨床價值..
목적 탐토초성조영대진단유선암액와림파결전이적응용개치.방법 대141례침윤형유선암환자행유선병조급액와림파결상규초성검사후,재대액와림파결진행초성조영,선용목측법관찰림파결초성조영증강모식,재용QontraXt연건분석초성조영시간-강도곡선삼수.근거초성조영관주특점,장액와림파결분위림파결전이조(유전이조)화무림파결전이조(무전이조),병여병리검사결과상비교.증강모식지간적대비채용χ2검험,조영삼수용단인소방차분석.결과 림파결유전이조관주모식표현위불균균증강형혹무증강,림파결무전이조표현위균균형증강,량조관주모식지간적차이유통계학의의(P=0.000).량조조영제도체시간、체봉시간、봉치강도지간적차이무통계학의의 (P치분별위0.129、0.094、0.140).림파결실질내고관주구여저관주구적차치(SImax- SImin)유전이조대우무전이조(P=0.000).이SImax- SImin 치대우28위최가림계점,감별적령민도위93.3%,특이도위80.8%.결론 초성조영대감별유선암액와림파결전이유일정적림상개치..
Objective To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma. Methods The breasts and axillae of 141 patients with breast carcinoma were examined with Ultrasound scans, followed by ultrasonography and CEUS of axillary lymph nodes. The perfusion patterns were assessed by direct visualization method. QontraXt software was subsequently used to determine the wash-in and wash-out parameters of each node. The axillary lymph nodes were divided into metastatic and nonmetastatic groups according to the perfusion features and were compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. The correlation of CEUS patterns with histopathology was analyzed by chi-square test. One-way analysis of variance was used to assess differences in perfusion parameters among the nodes. Results Homogeneous enhancement patterns were more frequently associated with non-metastasis of nodes, while heterogeneous enhancement patterns or avascular patterns were mostly suggestive of metastasis of nodes, with statistical difference between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was found in the arrival time, time to peak intensity, and peak signal intensity between the two groups(P= 0.129, 0.094, and 0.140, respectively). The difference between the maximum signal intensity and minimum signal intensity (Simax- Simin) were more obvious in metastatic nodes than in nonmetastatic ones(P=0.000). And histopathologic diagnosis could be predicted with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 80.8% by the standardized value of Simax- Simin above 28. Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography play a role in clinically discriminating metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes in patients with invasive breast cancer.