白血病·淋巴瘤
白血病·淋巴瘤
백혈병·림파류
JOURNAL OF LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
2010年
11期
646-650
,共5页
周可树%王翠翠%赵耀中%邢立杰%钱林生%于珍%齐军元%王建祥%邱录贵
週可樹%王翠翠%趙耀中%邢立傑%錢林生%于珍%齊軍元%王建祥%邱錄貴
주가수%왕취취%조요중%형립걸%전림생%우진%제군원%왕건상%구록귀
白血病,髓样,慢性%伊马替尼
白血病,髓樣,慢性%伊馬替尼
백혈병,수양,만성%이마체니
Leukemia,myeloid,chronic%Imatinib
目的 对伊马替尼治疗慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)的疗效及安全性进行分析,并初步探讨影响CML患者生存的因素.方法 135例CML患者应用伊马替尼治疗,监测其血常规、染色体核型、bcr-abl p210转录本表达及不良反应.结果 中位随访20(3~67)个月.慢性期患者累积获得的完全血液学缓解(CHR)率为97.9%,主要细胞遗传学缓解(MCyR)率为78.3%,完全细胞遗传学缓解(CCyR)率为72.2%,完全分子学缓解(CMoR)率为35.1%,均显著高于加速期及急变期(P<0.001).慢性期低危组与高危组之间CCyR率有差异(P=0.048).慢性期患者1、3和5年总生存(OS)率分别为:(97.8±1.5)%、(95.2±2.4)%、(91.9±3.2)%,疾病无进展生存(PFS)率分别为(92.6±2.7)%、(85.5±3.7)%、(81.3±4.3)%;加速期患者6个月、1、2年OS率分别为:(93.8±6.1)%、(72.5±11.8)%、(64.5±12.9)%,PFS率分别为:(92.3±7.4)%、(64.5±14.7)%、(53.7±15.7)%;急变期患者6、12、19个月OS率分别为:(86.4±7.3)%、(45.4±11.4)%、(19.4±9.8)%,PFS率分别为:(70.1±12.6)%、(37.6±15.6)%、(18.8±15.4)%.慢性期达到CMoR、CCyR的患者与仅达CHR者PFS及OS比较差异均有统计学意义(P≤0.001);多因素分析显示:耐药是影响慢性期患者PFS(P=0.000,RR=46.744)及OS(P=0.007,RR=20.270)的因素.伊马替尼口服非血液学毒性较轻,患者多可耐受;血液学毒性是减量或停药的主要原因.结论 伊马替尼治疗CML慢性期疗效显著优于加速期及急变期;慢性期患者达到CCyR甚至CMoR是获得长期生存的关键,伊马替尼耐药是伊马替尼治疗CML面临的主要问题.
目的 對伊馬替尼治療慢性粒細胞白血病(CML)的療效及安全性進行分析,併初步探討影響CML患者生存的因素.方法 135例CML患者應用伊馬替尼治療,鑑測其血常規、染色體覈型、bcr-abl p210轉錄本錶達及不良反應.結果 中位隨訪20(3~67)箇月.慢性期患者纍積穫得的完全血液學緩解(CHR)率為97.9%,主要細胞遺傳學緩解(MCyR)率為78.3%,完全細胞遺傳學緩解(CCyR)率為72.2%,完全分子學緩解(CMoR)率為35.1%,均顯著高于加速期及急變期(P<0.001).慢性期低危組與高危組之間CCyR率有差異(P=0.048).慢性期患者1、3和5年總生存(OS)率分彆為:(97.8±1.5)%、(95.2±2.4)%、(91.9±3.2)%,疾病無進展生存(PFS)率分彆為(92.6±2.7)%、(85.5±3.7)%、(81.3±4.3)%;加速期患者6箇月、1、2年OS率分彆為:(93.8±6.1)%、(72.5±11.8)%、(64.5±12.9)%,PFS率分彆為:(92.3±7.4)%、(64.5±14.7)%、(53.7±15.7)%;急變期患者6、12、19箇月OS率分彆為:(86.4±7.3)%、(45.4±11.4)%、(19.4±9.8)%,PFS率分彆為:(70.1±12.6)%、(37.6±15.6)%、(18.8±15.4)%.慢性期達到CMoR、CCyR的患者與僅達CHR者PFS及OS比較差異均有統計學意義(P≤0.001);多因素分析顯示:耐藥是影響慢性期患者PFS(P=0.000,RR=46.744)及OS(P=0.007,RR=20.270)的因素.伊馬替尼口服非血液學毒性較輕,患者多可耐受;血液學毒性是減量或停藥的主要原因.結論 伊馬替尼治療CML慢性期療效顯著優于加速期及急變期;慢性期患者達到CCyR甚至CMoR是穫得長期生存的關鍵,伊馬替尼耐藥是伊馬替尼治療CML麵臨的主要問題.
목적 대이마체니치료만성립세포백혈병(CML)적료효급안전성진행분석,병초보탐토영향CML환자생존적인소.방법 135례CML환자응용이마체니치료,감측기혈상규、염색체핵형、bcr-abl p210전록본표체급불량반응.결과 중위수방20(3~67)개월.만성기환자루적획득적완전혈액학완해(CHR)솔위97.9%,주요세포유전학완해(MCyR)솔위78.3%,완전세포유전학완해(CCyR)솔위72.2%,완전분자학완해(CMoR)솔위35.1%,균현저고우가속기급급변기(P<0.001).만성기저위조여고위조지간CCyR솔유차이(P=0.048).만성기환자1、3화5년총생존(OS)솔분별위:(97.8±1.5)%、(95.2±2.4)%、(91.9±3.2)%,질병무진전생존(PFS)솔분별위(92.6±2.7)%、(85.5±3.7)%、(81.3±4.3)%;가속기환자6개월、1、2년OS솔분별위:(93.8±6.1)%、(72.5±11.8)%、(64.5±12.9)%,PFS솔분별위:(92.3±7.4)%、(64.5±14.7)%、(53.7±15.7)%;급변기환자6、12、19개월OS솔분별위:(86.4±7.3)%、(45.4±11.4)%、(19.4±9.8)%,PFS솔분별위:(70.1±12.6)%、(37.6±15.6)%、(18.8±15.4)%.만성기체도CMoR、CCyR적환자여부체CHR자PFS급OS비교차이균유통계학의의(P≤0.001);다인소분석현시:내약시영향만성기환자PFS(P=0.000,RR=46.744)급OS(P=0.007,RR=20.270)적인소.이마체니구복비혈액학독성교경,환자다가내수;혈액학독성시감량혹정약적주요원인.결론 이마체니치료CML만성기료효현저우우가속기급급변기;만성기환자체도CCyR심지CMoR시획득장기생존적관건,이마체니내약시이마체니치료CML면림적주요문제.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients and analyse the factors affecting the survival. Methods 135 CML patients receiving imatinib were evaluated for hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses and adverse events. Results The median follow-up was 20 (range 3-67) months. The rate of cumulative complete hematological response (CHR), major cytogenetic response (MCyR), complete cytogenetic response( CCyR ) and complete molecular response (CMoR) in chronic phase CML patients were 97.9 %, 78.3 %, 72.2 % and 35.1%, respectively.These rates were significantly higher in chronic phase than in accelerated phase and blastic phase (P <0.001).The rate of CCyR in low-risk patients was significantly higher than high-risk patients (P =0.048). The estimated overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 3 and 5 year for chronic phase patients were (97.8±1.5) %, (95.2±2.4) % and (91.9±3.2) %, respectively. The estimated progression-free (PFS) survival rate at 1, 3 and 5 year were (92.6±2.7) %, (85.5±3.7) % and (81.3±4.3) %, respectively. The OS rate for accelerated phase patients at 6, 12 and 24 month were (93.8±6.1) %, (72.5±11.8) % and (64.5±12.9) %, the PFS rate were (92.3±7.4) %,(64.5±14.7) %, (53.7±15.7) %, respectively. The OS rate for blastic phase patients at 6, 12 and 19 month were (86.4±7.3) %, (45.4±11.4) %, (19.4±9.8) %, the PFS rate were (70.1±12.6) %, (37.6±15.6) % and (18.8±15.4) %, respectively. The OS and PFS of patients in chronic phase who achieved CCyR or CMoR were better than patients only achieved CHR (P ≤0.001). Multivariate analysis for survival of chronic phase patients indicated that imatinib resistance was the unfavourable factor for PFS (P =0.000, RR =46.744) and OS(P =0.007, RR =20.270). The non-hematological toxicity of imatinib was slight and tolerable, severe hematological toxicity was the major reason for dose reduction or drug discontinuation. Conclusion The efficacy of imatinib in chronic phase CML patients is significantly superior to which in accelerated phase and blastic phase; Achieving CCyR even CMoR is the most important thing for longer survival, iinatinib resistance is the major problem in the treatment with imatinib.