CAJ | 학술논문

目的观察中西医结合治疗社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效.方法选择2009年1月-2009年12月在我院就诊的社区获得性肺炎患者80例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,对照组给予常规抗生素治疗,治疗组在对照组的基础上加用中药参芪健脾合剂,观察两组患者的临床疗效及中医症候的改变.结果治疗组显效率及总有效率分别为:52.5%、87.5%,均高于对照组(分别为:20.0%、60.0%),两组比较P<0.05;两组在症状改善方面的比较,除肺部啰音外,其余指标治疗组均明显优于对照组(P<0.05).结论中西医结合方法治疗社区获得性肺炎临床疗效较好,值得推广.
목적 관찰중서의결합치료사구획득성폐염적림상료효.방법 선택2009년1월-2009년12월재아원취진적사구획득성폐염환자80례,수궤분위치료조화대조조,대조조급여상규항생소치료,치료조재대조조적기출상가용중약삼기건비합제,관찰량조환자적림상료효급중의증후적개변.결과 치료조현효솔급총유효솔분별위:52.5%、87.5%,균고우대조조(분별위:20.0%、60.0%),량조비교P<0.05;량조재증상개선방면적비교,제폐부라음외,기여지표치료조균명현우우대조조(P<0.05).결론 중서의결합방법치료사구획득성폐염림상료효교호,치득추엄.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine combined with Western medicine for community-acquired pneumonia. Methods From January 2009 to December 2009, 80 patients with community-acquired pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive conventional antibiotic therapy alone (control group), or the same therapy plus traditional Chinese medicine Shenqi mixture (study group). The efficacy of the therapies and the symptoms and signs were observed in all the patients. Results The efficiency and total efficiency were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group (52.5% vs. 20.0% and 87.5% vs. 60.0%,P<0.05). The study group was superior to the control group in the improvement of symptoms and signs except for pulmonaryrales. Conclusions Traditional Chinese medicine combined with Western medicine for community-acquired pneumonia achieves a better efficacy and is worth popularizing.