CAJ | 학술논문

目的观察比较中药配合经尿道电切术治疗前列腺增生症的疗效.方法将60例前列腺增生症患者随机分为两组,治疗组30例采用经尿道电切术加中药治疗,对照组30例采用单纯经尿道电切术治疗.结果治疗组术后下尿路刺激症状改善明显,术后IPSS评分改善明显优于对照组(P＜0.01).术后膀胱冲洗时间、术后冲洗量、膀胱痉挛发生率、便秘发生率明显少于对照组(均P＜0.05).术后留置尿管时间、术后并发再次出血及尿潴留少于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(均P＞0.05).结论中药配合经尿道电切术治疗前列腺增生症疗效优于单纯经尿道电切术,治疗后不良反应少.
목적 관찰비교중약배합경뇨도전절술치료전렬선증생증적료효.방법 장60례전렬선증생증환자수궤분위량조,치료조30례채용경뇨도전절술가중약치료,대조조30례채용단순경뇨도전절술치료.결과 치료조술후하뇨로자격증상개선명현,술후IPSS평분개선명현우우대조조(P＜0.01).술후방광충세시간、술후충세량、방광경련발생솔、편비발생솔명현소우대조조(균P＜0.05).술후류치뇨관시간、술후병발재차출혈급뇨저류소우대조조,단차이무통계학의의(균P＞0.05).결론 중약배합경뇨도전절술치료전렬선증생증료효우우단순경뇨도전절술,치료후불량반응소.
Objective To observe and compare the clinical effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)combined with transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) and simple TURP in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods 60 patients with BPH were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group(n=30) was given the TCM combined TURP and the control group(n = 30) was given TURP alone. The effects were observed.Results Improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS), the international prostate symptom score (I-PSS) of the treatment group was better than that of the control group with significant difference (P ＜ 0.01). The time and quantity of bladder irrigation, incidence of bladder spasm, incidence of constipation after operation of the treatment group were less than that of the control group with significant difference(all P ＜0.05). Catheter retention time,postoperative bleeding, urinary retention were less and had no significant difference between the two groups (all P ＞0. 05). Conclusion The effect of TCM combined with TURP was significantly superior to that of simple TURP; and adverse reaction after treatment was less than that in the control group.